Time from New Hire to the Wide-body's
#411
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,093
My long term hunch is the 777x is too expensive and even the 777 in general will be similar to the 747 in yesteryear. It's big and expensive. The 787 I think will take over for widebody service. But, I'm not a revenue or ops guru just a backseat driver.
#414
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
While we're at it, how about a A220 order as well.
#415
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,294
#416
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,093
I don't like using the word never but I don't see the 220 on property here ever. I would like to see some encouraging signs of 319s growing though if we can pick up domestic demand.
I'm more excited about a new 737. Composite fuselage and all electric including pressurization. Plugged in with ground power one could run the packs, almost no need to run an APU except for engine start.
Unless they go to a blended design the planes of the future will look a lot like the ones today.
#417
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 135
Why not just go ahead and have an electric starter so the GPU could handle that too?
#420
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,093
- if you lose a gen in flight you are now single gen instead of starting up the APU
- unable to MEL a gen or component such as CSD
- an electric starter would pull a huge amp draw, think about your typical car battery rated for 500+ amps (12v) but has an alternator in the 150 amp range. You'd need to upgrade the ground power units to add either a battery or large capacitor.
- you could use a battery but that would then also add weight on the airplane
- if ground power is out you'd need a big GPU to handle the load
- shutdown off the gate, cheaper to run APU vs an engine
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post