Time from New Hire to the Wide-body's
#422
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,092
Ha. Yeah. I think eventually it will become a regulatory requirement like over in Europe. I mean it really doesn't make sense to run APUs when suitable electric power and and air is (potentially) available. It's just wasteful both $ wise and emissions wise.
#424
#425
#426
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
I don't think that would be a good idea.
- if you lose a gen in flight you are now single gen instead of starting up the APU
- unable to MEL a gen or component such as CSD
- an electric starter would pull a huge amp draw, think about your typical car battery rated for 500+ amps (12v) but has an alternator in the 150 amp range. You'd need to upgrade the ground power units to add either a battery or large capacitor.
- you could use a battery but that would then also add weight on the airplane
- if ground power is out you'd need a big GPU to handle the load
- shutdown off the gate, cheaper to run APU vs an engine
Pretty sure the 787 is this. I’m told it uses starter generators.
#427
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,092
And it still has an APU. As for starting the engine at the gate without the APU, I don't believe that is possible, it draws too much current. So much in fact you need two large GPUs to start without an APU.
But, a smaller 737 sized aircraft may not need nearly as much current draw.
But, a smaller 737 sized aircraft may not need nearly as much current draw.
#429
#430
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Where is everyone getting that this is a one month bid? The previous bid was for June, this one is for Aug. It says on page one training starting June and July.
It's a small bid because they want all hands on deck for summer flying.
I'll guess Group 4 FO 11,000, group 2 CA 11,800
It's a small bid because they want all hands on deck for summer flying.
I'll guess Group 4 FO 11,000, group 2 CA 11,800
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post