Airline Pilot Forums

Airline Pilot Forums was designed to be a community where working airline pilots can share ideas and information about the aviation field. In the forum you will find information about major and regional airline carriers, career training, interview and job seeker help, finance, and living the airline pilot lifestyle.




View Full Version : Union Economics


jungle
08-25-2008, 09:46 PM
Friday, February 18, 2005
Second Opinion
Corruption fuels decline of unionsOrlando Business Journal - by John Carlisle

Organized labor, still smarting from its multimillion-dollar failure to defeat George Bush, got another dose of bad news recently when the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the percentage of Americans belonging to labor unions fell last year to an all-time low.

These figures show that only 12.5 percent of workers, including both the private sector and government, were enrolled in unions in 2004, down from 12.9 percent in 2003. This represents a dramatic drop from labor's peak in 1956, when 35 percent of private-sector workers belonged to unions.

Concerned about this ominous trend, Andrew Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, laid out a 10-point plan that includes merging smaller unions to create mega unions, restricting the trades or economic sectors these unions could organize and requiring unions to spend more time organizing workers. If implemented, the number of unions that make up the AFL-CIO would shrink from 60 to 20. It is thought that such centralization would enable unions to conduct more targeted and efficient organizing campaigns.

But even if the measures are adopted, they fail to address what's undermining organized labor's credibility with workers: misuse of members' dues for political activism and lack of financial accountability.

Unions take in at least $17 billion annually, mainly from compulsory dues culled from the paychecks of members. But only about 20 percent of dues are used for collective bargaining, which is the top priority of rank-and-file workers.

In the 2004 election cycle, union political action committees gave more than $58 million to political parties and candidates. Of this amount, 87 percent went to Democrats. Unions also donated about $100 million to pro-Democratic 527 committees. The Democratic Party is now so beholden to unions that the latter have virtual veto power over party policy decisions.

There would be nothing wrong with such political spending if it expressed the wishes of members. But it often doen't. Usually, 35 to 40 percent of union members vote Republican. And even many Democratic union members do not approve of their dues going to political activities.

Most workers who join a union do so to advance their economic interests. Pushing a political agenda is at best a secondary activity that should not consume a disproportionate amount of union dues.

Union leaders also undermine their credibility by misusing members' pension funds for political advantage or personal gain. Federal law requires fund managers to act solely for the benefit of workers. But members have little say in how unions use their retirement plans.

For instance, unions will invest pension funds in corporations just to force boards of directors to adopt shareholder resolutions endorsing labor's political goals. The problem is that such politically motivated investments often do little to improve the profitability of the members' pensions.

Worse, bosses raid pension funds to enrich themselves, their cronies, or their friends in the mob. In 2002, 44 percent of the Justice Department's 357 racketeering investigations involved union pension and welfare funds.

If unions are serious about restoring credibility, they should simply open their books. The federal Landrum-Griffin Act ostensibly requires unions to file annual financial reports with the U.S. Department of Labor. But the act is an ineffectual law that unions brazenly flout. Every year, roughly 30 percent of unions don't even file the report. Compounding the problem, the Department of Labor audits a miniscule 1-5 percent of the unions that do bother to file.

Amid all the brave talk of change at the AFL-CIO, there is no mention of the need to stop these abuses.

Labor experts warn that if dramatic steps are not taken soon, organized labor could collapse within a generation. If it does, it will be thanks to union bosses like Stern, who refuse to acknowledge labor's culture of corruption.



John Carlisle is director of policy at the National Legal and Policy Center, a nonpartisan foundation promoting ethics and accountability in public life.


vagabond
08-25-2008, 09:53 PM
Oh, don't get me started on this. My husband has been a Teamster for longer than Toilet Duck has been alive, yet he (hubby, that is) has little to show for this loyalty.

Wasn't there a lawsuit about unions using member dues for political activity? I can't recall much more about it.

Hmmm, and this article is from 2005. Nothing much has changed?

jungle
08-25-2008, 10:02 PM
Oh, don't get me started on this. My husband has been a Teamster for longer than Toilet Duck has been alive, yet he (hubby, that is) has little to show for this loyalty.

Wasn't there a lawsuit about unions using member dues for political activity? I can't recall much more about it.

Hmmm, and this article is from 2005. Nothing much has changed?

The trend continues. It is unfortunate that many of us still cling to political notions about unions, when it is the economic side that has the most importance and benefit to the workers.