Search
Notices

Atlas / Southern

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2020, 06:30 AM
  #651  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 140
Default

Originally Posted by maxjet View Post
I couldn’t disagree more and submit that this is the best thing for K2 pilots. Their Union has done nothing for them. DK is a wise man, who I hope, sees this opportunity to negotiate a deal favorable to both parties. If he doesn’t, then after the required waiting period they vote in another Union. Nothing was being accomplished by 1224 so they have lost nothing by leaving.
Maxjet I agree. flyguy sounds like a current K2 pilot or former who was is trying to flamebait. Its soley in the hands of the owner, if he chooses to ignore the group of pilots that believe and trust in him, it will be his lost! In this hiring environment no one can afford to play chicken with their pilot group.

Last edited by CA Deplorable; 02-21-2020 at 06:43 AM.
CA Deplorable is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 06:37 AM
  #652  
On the 1st tee
 
Enginethunder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyKnoxville View Post
Unbelievable
Considering the post you quoted is coming from a Freedom A lister not surprising at all.
Enginethunder is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 07:59 AM
  #653  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
i suspect MaxJet was planting a nugget in this thread to get everyone who sees themselves as the Union's enforcer to start shouting-down people and insisting on gross simplifications. His game is to make us look silly. That's why he didn't post his comments in the related safety thread. The more we start ranting, the sillier we look.

Management certainly bares the lion's share of blame for the actions of departments and personnel they control. We all could have done more, however.

Any organization isalways in a process of self correction. Our exco has and continues to make mistakes, and some of the members are better than others. They threaten to fire me from my union positions on a regular basis (most recently for asking about safety programs on our Facebook site) and focus on maintaining social order at the expense of delivering real results. Even with all that, I think they are better today than they were a year ago or two years ago. So, yeah, we screw the pooc . We're improving and correcting though. That's more than I can say for other elements, like management.
Fair enough, but to blame the union for how the company hires, trains and schedules is a bit of a stretch. The union is involved with those matters only as deep as the company permits, which is to say, not very deep at all!
zerozero is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 09:14 AM
  #654  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,343
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero View Post
Fair enough, but to blame the union for how the company hires, trains and schedules is a bit of a stretch. The union is involved with those matters only as deep as the company permits, which is to say, not very deep at all!
Agreed. I think if we were going to cite a union component in the event it's elsewhere and much less pronounced (priorities regarding safety proposals, cultural effects within the pilot group, etc.). That's why I say the lion's share of blame on this is on the executives, then managers, etc.
Elevation is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:00 AM
  #655  
VHR-very happily retired
 
maxjet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Retired
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero View Post
Fair enough, but to blame the union for how the company hires, trains and schedules is a bit of a stretch. The union is involved with those matters only as deep as the company permits, which is to say, not very deep at all!
Woah there cowboy. I am not blaming YOUR Union for anything. I am saying that the Union needs to take an active stand in monitoring the training department. As I have written this is not an AAWW problem only. Unions and companies love to tout the safety jargon. Yet, these programs continue to roll on. If you think that what I have written about the state of the training industry is exaggerated, then you need to pull your head out of the sand. If movement isn’t made towards better, more applicable, student based instruction, the accident will just be the first one. Read your history. This would not be the first paradigm shift in training. It has been done before. The last time was because of Union envolvement.
maxjet is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:12 AM
  #656  
VHR-very happily retired
 
maxjet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Retired
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by Enginethunder View Post
Considering the post you quoted is coming from a Freedom A lister not surprising at all.
Such a silly person throwing stones.

Are you going to try to tell us that 1224 has done ANYTHING for our brothers and sisters at K4? Did the union negotiate the possible flow to K4? No. Have they done anything but give those pilots lanyards and take their dues? K2 pilots don’t generate enough dues to fend for themselves and the repayment costs of borrowing the capital to cover the cost under the union scheme is ridiculous. (I have been told that ALPA does NOT require you to borrow money from National to pay for their services?) They have moved away with very little risk and potential great reward.

Please explain to us all how staying in 1224 would have benefited their pilot group at all. I submit that DK would have just ignored them and they would never be released. Seems like a good time to try a new strategy that benefits the members and not the union.
maxjet is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:28 AM
  #657  
On the 1st tee
 
Enginethunder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by maxjet View Post
Such a silly person throwing stones.

Are you going to try to tell us that 1224 has done ANYTHING for our brothers and sisters at K4? Did the union negotiate the possible flow to K4? No. Have they done anything but give those pilots lanyards and take their dues? K2 pilots don’t generate enough dues to fend for themselves and the repayment costs of borrowing the capital to cover the cost under the union scheme is ridiculous. (I have been told that ALPA does NOT require you to borrow money from National to pay for their services?) They have moved away with very little risk and potential great reward.

Please explain to us all how staying in 1224 would have benefited their pilot group at all. I submit that DK would have just ignored them and they would never be released. Seems like a good time to try a new strategy that benefits the members and not the union.
Nice diatribe. Didn’t see any denials in there though. Stone away
Enginethunder is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:42 AM
  #658  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by maxjet View Post
Woah there cowboy. I am not blaming YOUR Union for anything. I am saying that the Union needs to take an active stand in monitoring the training department. As I have written this is not an AAWW problem only. Unions and companies love to tout the safety jargon. Yet, these programs continue to roll on. If you think that what I have written about the state of the training industry is exaggerated, then you need to pull your head out of the sand. If movement isn’t made towards better, more applicable, student based instruction, the accident will just be the first one. Read your history. This would not be the first paradigm shift in training. It has been done before. The last time was because of Union envolvement.
I understand quite well the problems we have in our training dept.

First of all, let's start at the top--the very top--with the CEO. He has effectively stonewalled all negotiations and even LoAs to the point where implementing AQP is unthinkable until we actually secure a new contract. So until that point in time, very far in the future, all of us are essentially doomed to continue training under an outdated and--as you rightly point out--ineffective system.

That is hardly the fault of the union, and indeed something unique to AAWW. The union wants a modern up to date training center. Let's settle a modern, up to date, industry standard contract with modern, up to date contractual language, and then we can start getting the crews the modern up to date training they deserve.
zerozero is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 02:12 PM
  #659  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,343
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero View Post
I understand quite well the problems we have in our training dept.

First of all, let's start at the top--the very top--with the CEO. He has effectively stonewalled all negotiations and even LoAs to the point where implementing AQP is unthinkable until we actually secure a new contract. So until that point in time, very far in the future, all of us are essentially doomed to continue training under an outdated and--as you rightly point out--ineffective system.

That is hardly the fault of the union, and indeed something unique to AAWW. The union wants a modern up to date training center. Let's settle a modern, up to date, industry standard contract with modern, up to date contractual language, and then we can start getting the crews the modern up to date training they deserve.
Regarding contracts, training and safety I think we get into a chicken and egg situation. Some will say we need a new contract so we can get training and safety improvements. I think focusing on safety and training applies pressure to get us that next contract. Either the company is in a position where they have to refuse training and safety improvements on the heels of a crash and Jan,2020 written commitment to safety or they deliver those improvements and face the added pressure to find and retain pilots who can perform. It's a win-win.

So can we do more? Yeah. We can push a lot harder on the safety front. Does that mean I think we are entirely to blame for our problems, no. I dont even think we are significantly to blame. But we can do a lot better. The recent Coronavirus MOU proves we can get things done. Let's attack our safety faults.
Elevation is offline  
Old 02-21-2020, 02:47 PM
  #660  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
Regarding contracts, training and safety I think we get into a chicken and egg situation. Some will say we need a new contract so we can get training and safety improvements. I think focusing on safety and training applies pressure to get us that next contract. Either the company is in a position where they have to refuse training and safety improvements on the heels of a crash and Jan,2020 written commitment to safety or they deliver those improvements and face the added pressure to find and retain pilots who can perform. It's a win-win.

So can we do more? Yeah. We can push a lot harder on the safety front. Does that mean I think we are entirely to blame for our problems, no. I dont even think we are significantly to blame. But we can do a lot better. The recent Coronavirus MOU proves we can get things done. Let's attack our safety faults.
Sure! It seems logical, even obvious, to think safety concerns might increase pressure on the company to get a deal done. Right. NOW.

Alas, just look at the facts for your answer.
zerozero is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
verticalspeed
Part 135
5669
03-25-2024 04:02 PM
boeingdvr
Atlas/Polar
150
09-12-2018 06:14 PM
MD-11Loader
Atlas/Polar
212
05-06-2016 10:20 AM
MD-11Loader
Mergers and Acquisitions
1
01-30-2016 07:21 AM
EZRider
Cargo
2
03-09-2010 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices