Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
New Atlas CBA = Colossal Union Failure >

New Atlas CBA = Colossal Union Failure

Notices

New Atlas CBA = Colossal Union Failure

Old 09-10-2021, 10:17 PM
  #21  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Crusoe View Post
In this fantasy scenario, you would have had a truly amalgamated CBA between our bottom barrel CBA & the old Southern pos bankruptcy CBA that was in the sub-basement. It would have occurred prior to most of the other large jumps at all the other airlines and well prior to any incentive by the company to give anything other than the smallest of token raises as market forces were still years away from approaching the shores of Purchase. No vote, no strike threat, no incentive on management’s part & no leverage on our side. So you’d currently be standing here with almost nothing to show for it watching everyone else zoom past…only to have them buy another smaller, bottom barrel CBA airline in a year or two & wash rinse repeat. Never even lifting a finger or taking a chance to fight for the opportunity to vote…ever. Brilliant.
You are mistaken if you think there is anything in this new JCBA that would not have been there 4 years ago. Management knew exactly what they were prepared to grant in the new deal before this entire process even began. Would the pay rates have been lower than what was awarded today? Probably. But even if they were $20 less per hour than what has been awarded, they would still have averaged about $20/hr more than the 2011 negotiated rates (and would have included COL and perhaps even longevity raises each of the past 4 years). And pilots would have been earning those rates for the last 4 years. At roughly 1000 credit hours per year, that's roughly $20,000 in lost income per year, for four years, on average.

Not quite sure what you mean by "...fight for the opportunity to vote...". If you are suggesting that there has been an actual threat of a strike in the last four years, or that any other actions taken by the Union leadership created leverage against management in this process, then you are mistaken. A reading of every court decision rendered throughout this process over the past 5 years, as well as the RLA and all relevant case law would disabuse one of this notion.

Please do not misunderstand me. We are on the same side. I fully support the new union leadership in their efforts to protect and improve our working conditions. I am not seeking to "bash the Union", but a thoughtful review and critique of the Union leadership's decisions over the past 5 years is warranted. Mistakes were made. I see them as honest mistakes, because I have zero evidence to the contrary. Without looking critically at the process that brought us to today, we'll never correct that which needs to be corrected in order to truly improve the working conditions for all of us.
Prof Chaos is offline  
Old 09-10-2021, 10:50 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by JT8D View Post
We could’ve gotten a POS like this in arbitration back in 2016. The union only delayed it by 5 years. Union’s stated goals were to make big gains in work rules and compensation, and allow for us to vote on it. They completely FAILED on all fronts.
Blaming your leadership is as tone deaf as claiming that JD was going to give you anything in 2016. In 2016 you'd have a 2.5% match on your 401k, split the baby with Southern pay rates, 18 day lines, 13 day "Vacation Lines", 2.4 hours of rig a day, no business class international travel... Because (some of) you guys fought you won contract parity for Southern AND then started arbitration. Guess what you'd also win with your 2016 (but really 2018) arbitrated contract? An amendable contract next year where Atlas just buys Amerijet since your theoretical leadership is so gullible that they'll believe whatever JD tells them. Be thankful your leadership had the vision to understand what JD was attempting to do.

The bottom line is this... People who could've left didn't. People who should've refused to work there accepted jobs there. I could go on and on about the things you could've done to win a better CBA but in the end you lost by a pretty close score. If not for Covid Atlas might've been forced to pay you. If 100 more people left that might've been enough... If 100 more people refused to work there it might've been enough. There's absolutely no reason that you can't force Atlas to negotiate with you tomorrow. Literally everyone is desperate for pilots again. Vote with your feet. If Atlas has more pilots in 12 months then look in the mirror.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 09-10-2021, 10:54 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Politicians shouldn’t try to fight a war and even the best intentioned amateurs shouldn’t try to be negotiators.
You need a lawyer to fight a lawyer and the one who represents themselves has a fool for a client.
Playing this drama in Adagio was a poor tactic.

What did you expect?
Forced into arbitration to be ruled on by an 83(?) year old who apparently does this by himself as a medical issue delayed the process by a month. That in itself was a major red flag and a big indicator that this would go “Kalitta” as that was the last offer the Company made.
Yall had plenty of lawyers involved. Plenty of them. This contract reflects the leverage you had.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 09-10-2021, 11:01 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,343
Default

Leadership made decisions that others pay for. Leadership accepts thanks for jobs well done. They can accept fault for jobs done poorly. That's the burden of leadership.

Along those lines I think it's important to mention that our leadership, not our union members have failed us. Committees like scheduling, fatigue and hotels just to name a few have been slogging away for the pilots. Hardly any of these folk have taken a dime in union money according to the LM-2s.
Elevation is offline  
Old 09-10-2021, 11:05 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8 View Post
‘I noticed this..... which left me torn on the issue but after taking sometime to think things over, the award is no surprise and quite few folks I’ve talked to think the same thing. Union did what it could, the company just had a better chess strategy. No concessions were taken which is important. Next important thing is to get this CBA implemented and move forward from there. Time to make lemonade out of lemons.

That means folks will need to decide what they want to do, and is the best for themselves and their families. If it is to stay great, if not, that’s great too. Lemonade out of lemons.
Exactly... Preparation for the next round of negotiations starts today. Get organized. Learn from mistakes. Make necessary changes. Get good at enforcing the new CBA.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 09-10-2021, 11:15 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by Prof Chaos View Post
You are mistaken if you think there is anything in this new JCBA that would not have been there 4 years ago. Management knew exactly what they were prepared to grant in the new deal before this entire process even began. Would the pay rates have been lower than what was awarded today? Probably. But even if they were $20 less per hour than what has been awarded, they would still have averaged about $20/hr more than the 2011 negotiated rates (and would have included COL and perhaps even longevity raises each of the past 4 years). And pilots would have been earning those rates for the last 4 years. At roughly 1000 credit hours per year, that's roughly $20,000 in lost income per year, for four years, on average.

Not quite sure what you mean by "...fight for the opportunity to vote...". If you are suggesting that there has been an actual threat of a strike in the last four years, or that any other actions taken by the Union leadership created leverage against management in this process, then you are mistaken. A reading of every court decision rendered throughout this process over the past 5 years, as well as the RLA and all relevant case law would disabuse one of this notion.

Please do not misunderstand me. We are on the same side. I fully support the new union leadership in their efforts to protect and improve our working conditions. I am not seeking to "bash the Union", but a thoughtful review and critique of the Union leadership's decisions over the past 5 years is warranted. Mistakes were made. I see them as honest mistakes, because I have zero evidence to the contrary. Without looking critically at the process that brought us to today, we'll never correct that which needs to be corrected in order to truly improve the working conditions for all of us.
That's a complete fantasy. Management has stated that they see their competition for labor as Mesa. An "Amalgamated" contract with Southern's would've gotten them closer to that goal. Then if they ever really needed to pay more they could just con union leadership into whatever they said since it would've worked in the past. Yall fought hard and did the best you could under difficult circumstances. Now you'll have to adjust.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 09-11-2021, 04:20 AM
  #27  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 8
Default

What did you all think? Frankly, I'm impressed with the pay scale. The union never fought for the pilot group. They were busy lining their pockets and eating steak dinners. Paying themselves UB days for all those pathetic picketing events. While negotiations were going on, your newly elected Chairman was texting his friends at UPS to help him get on. What does that tell you about how much faith he had in your future? This contract is gonna be with the pilot group for the next 12 years!
YellowBird is offline  
Old 09-11-2021, 06:05 AM
  #28  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Originally Posted by Globemaster2827 View Post
Blaming your leadership is as tone deaf as claiming that JD was going to give you anything in 2016. In 2016 you'd have a 2.5% match on your 401k, split the baby with Southern pay rates, 18 day lines, 13 day "Vacation Lines", 2.4 hours of rig a day, no business class international travel... Because (some of) you guys fought you won contract parity for Southern AND then started arbitration. Guess what you'd also win with your 2016 (but really 2018) arbitrated contract? An amendable contract next year where Atlas just buys Amerijet since your theoretical leadership is so gullible that they'll believe whatever JD tells them. Be thankful your leadership had the vision to understand what JD was attempting to do.
There's absolutely no reason that you can't force Atlas to negotiate with you tomorrow. Literally everyone is desperate for pilots again. Vote with your feet. If Atlas has more pilots in 12 months then look in the mirror.
Is that going to be the Union strategy *again* sigh
Discourage people from working here and pestering new hires for taking the job?
Like that worked so well last time.

SMH
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 09-11-2021, 06:25 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Is that going to be the Union strategy *again* sigh
Discourage people from working here and pestering new hires for taking the job?
Like that worked so well last time.

SMH
What strategy would you prefer? It's the only thing the company responds to. The RLA is crap and doesn't allow unions to do ****.
APCbot is offline  
Old 09-11-2021, 06:27 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,210
Default

What’s retirement look like ?
Softpayman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Royaldane
Charter
251
02-11-2019 03:43 AM
Want2BAtlasAv8r
Hiring News
121
06-15-2018 07:26 PM
FlyingViking
Union Talk
7
09-14-2011 08:29 AM
Fins Up
Union Talk
26
07-28-2011 05:41 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices