Search
Notices

Atlas: The good...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2022, 12:58 PM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: sandwich
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP View Post
Just wanted to point out that 25.N.1 of the new CBA gives a lot more protection for primary lineholders in terms of schedule changes. Read it. Use it.
JAN/FEB ORD 747 bid packet contained 9 such lines for 37 Captain bidders. So, it appears that those protections will only be available to the folks with high relative seniority in their seat and base. Which sucks.
Nate2046 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 08:02 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,504
Default

Originally Posted by Nate2046 View Post
JAN/FEB ORD 747 bid packet contained 9 such lines for 37 Captain bidders. So, it appears that those protections will only be available to the folks with high relative seniority in their seat and base. Which sucks.
Thanks Nate, those are some revealing data points right there. ORD, especially helpful - good to know.

Hope it gets better Swakid8.

NightIP - Totally agree and compensated for it very well. It has been working out very well these past 2 months.
C17B74 is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 05:54 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Atlas just ordered 4 new 777s

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...301455224.html
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 08:12 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 153
Default

Who will fly them tho
thrustisamust is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 12:18 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,504
Default

Originally Posted by thrustisamust View Post
Who will fly them tho
All a shell game, we’ll just have to wait and see. Even if it did say our crews, I would wait until actual delivery. -400s have some time left but who knows at the time of new aircraft induction how plans, the world, leadership changes. Of course you were alluding to the lack of bodies I believe but maybe this could help us? 10%-25% additive, add 8% for a 10% DC, 5.25 rig, hmmmm.

Last edited by C17B74; 01-06-2022 at 12:47 PM.
C17B74 is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 12:22 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRJJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 1,110
Default

Originally Posted by C17B74 View Post
All a shell game, we’ll just have to wait and see. Even if it did say our crews, I would wait until actual delivery. -400s have some time left but who knows at the time of new aircraft induction how plans, the world, leadership changes. Of course you were alluding to the lack of bodies I believe but maybe this could help us?
I also wonder if Amazon saying they want to fly 330s/777s has sth to do with it.
Maybe just long term planning for those aging -400s? Who knows
CRJJ is online now  
Old 01-06-2022, 07:50 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Nate2046 View Post
JAN/FEB ORD 747 bid packet contained 9 such lines for 37 Captain bidders. So, it appears that those protections will only be available to the folks with high relative seniority in their seat and base. Which sucks.
19 lines total for 37 Captains. 9 were Primary lines and well over a quarter were reserve lines with violates the new CBA. What is going on here?
mcfadden is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 08:32 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jrmyl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 747
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by mcfadden View Post
19 lines total for 37 Captains. 9 were Primary lines and well over a quarter were reserve lines with violates the new CBA. What is going on here?
It does not violate the contract as the contract states it is for the entire fleet. Not just per base.
jrmyl is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 10:26 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by jrmyl View Post
It does not violate the contract as the contract states it is for the entire fleet. Not just per base.
That explains it then, thanks.
mcfadden is offline  
Old 01-07-2022, 05:41 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3pointlanding's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by CRJJ View Post
I also wonder if Amazon saying they want to fly 330s/777s has sth to do with it.
Maybe just long term planning for those aging -400s? Who knows
The Queen use a lot more gas than thee 777 for a little more cargo, maybe that is the reason. The 767 can no longer be produced in a few more years due to CO2 emissions so the 777 is the way to go for now. I know nothing about the 330 but knowing Aerospace the aircraft will probably meet the green requirements.
3pointlanding is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chimpy
Spirit
0
09-27-2017 07:31 AM
Lockheed
Cargo
86
11-03-2016 05:38 PM
Polarfr8dog
Cargo
19
09-09-2011 04:22 PM
jungle
Money Talk
48
12-28-2009 11:11 AM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices