Originally Posted by JackStraw
(Post 2829652)
16/14? Dude, do some research in the Atlas Hiring thread and learn the very basics then get back to us.
|
Originally Posted by tengssuuciurta
(Post 2829563)
wtf....
lol |
Originally Posted by arrrrree
(Post 2829645)
Is the schedule on the 76 only 16/14 or are there multiple types of schedules?
Try 20/10 21/9 Depending on your commute and being extended. 16/14. Yeah - if your Uber senior bidding RSV lines in base. |
Originally Posted by arrrrree
(Post 2829645)
Is the schedule on the 76 only 16/14 or are there multiple types of schedules?
If you live near CVG, and do the 767 DHL hub turns or R3/R2 reserve you can be home all the time. I don't know what the newer Amazon schedules are like... Any other specific questions PM me. |
I saw your plane on the ramp in a particular overseas location yesterday. Did you guys drop off the stuff I ordered 2 months ago?
|
IBT v. Atlas, DC Cir, Req for Reh'g
|
The motion is a nice effort, but it's a fair analysis that it isn't going to succeed. Such motions almost never do -- particularly the ones for en banc rehearing -- and there is nothing about this one that identifies the kind of objectively-clear error that would result in a rehearing by the panel, or the kind of super-important legal issue that might result in an en banc rehearing. IMHO, when you're asking for an en banc rehearing on anything other than something of super-important national significance that a member of the general public would think was important, you're just going through the motions in the hope that you win the lottery. It's a Hail Mary of significant order. It can't hurt, if you don't mind paying the legal fees, but it's not normally something you do with a rational expectation of success.
|
It shouldn't be this way, but Atlas intentionally filed this case in DC for a reason. And it's apparent that forum shopping paid off in a big way. There is very little justice in our legal system.
|
Originally Posted by nitefreight
(Post 2864842)
It shouldn't be this way, but Atlas intentionally filed this case in DC for a reason. And it's apparent that forum shopping paid off in a big way. There is very little justice in our legal system.
I don't think that SD Ohio or the Sixth Circuit are bastions of pro-pilot judges that the case was deprived of by the venue choice. I frankly think that, other than possibly being hometowned and having to hire local counsel outside of my law firm, I might prefer to be in the SD Ohio if I were an airline and perceived court sympathies were my sole deciding factor. So, unless somebody got really-creative, the basic venue choices were DC or Cincinnati, and, me at least, I don't think that influenced the result. |
It's no surprise that a New York company represented by big firms would find it more convenient to litigate in DC rather than the Southern District of Ohio. NYS Department of State Division of Corporations Entity Information The information contained in this database is current through August 2, 2019. Selected Entity Name: ATLAS AIR, INC. Selected Entity Status Information Current Entity Name: ATLAS AIR, INC. DOS ID #: 1736154 Initial DOS Filing Date: JUNE 21, 1993 County: NASSAU Jurisdiction: DELAWARE Entity Type: FOREIGN BUSINESS CORPORATION Current Entity Status: ACTIVE |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands