![]() |
Average Age
With all of the current merger/acquisition talk over here at Purple I have a genuine question. How would an SLI look between purple and Atlas? We are an older airline, what is the average age of an Atlas guy/gal?
|
Originally Posted by GRINGOMANDINGO
(Post 4002876)
With all of the current merger/acquisition talk over here at Purple I have a genuine question. How would an SLI look between purple and Atlas? We are an older airline, what is the average age of an Atlas guy/gal?
|
Originally Posted by GRINGOMANDINGO
(Post 4002876)
With all of the current merger/acquisition talk over here at Purple I have a genuine question. How would an SLI look between purple and Atlas? We are an older airline, what is the average age of an Atlas guy/gal?
|
Old and young with not a lot in the middle. Idk how else to say it
|
average age is 46 right now I believe.
|
Originally Posted by Roverruckus
(Post 4003305)
average age is 46 right now I believe.
Some have aged better than others. |
Don’t you worry. JD will make sure you guys get stapled to the bottom of his baby’s list.
But seriously, an SLI will probably go by the tremendous amount of regulation on the subject. It’ll be more or less 1:1 which, at worst, means a few Atlas alumni find themselves junior to themselves (had they stayed). None of this is likely to happen so I wouldn’t worry about it. |
Appreciate the replies. I think there's a strong case thats what fedex's vision for growth is. Just having a sidebar with a few buddies and we were curious the average age over there. Trying to plot out how it would all shake out. Still trying to figure out the whole amalgamation piece and determine if thats a threat or not.
|
Wait, is there a real possibility of Fedex and Atlas merging? Like, are there real, verified talks going on?
|
Originally Posted by SnarfSnarf
(Post 4004512)
Wait, is there a real possibility of Fedex and Atlas merging? Like, are there real, verified talks going on?
|
Originally Posted by Clue32
(Post 4004520)
No. There are no talks of a merger. This is all wild speculation.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 4005333)
The never ending FedEx rumor. lol. FDX ALPA has deeper pockets and larger numbers. They would come out ahead in an integration and IBT would be gone.
|
I'm not aware of any behind the curtain talks but it's definitely being talked about heavily among the crew force. That sucks y'all aren't happy with the IBT because ALPA is becoming less and less popular by the day on property over here.
|
Originally Posted by GRINGOMANDINGO
(Post 4005888)
I'm not aware of any behind the curtain talks but it's definitely being talked about heavily among the crew force. That sucks y'all aren't happy with the IBT because ALPA is becoming less and less popular by the day on property over here.
So its definitely not heavily talked about among the Atlas crew force. Its more of a joke these days. |
Originally Posted by Birdsmash
(Post 4002939)
The last merger at Atlas was based on DOH.
|
It would take MASSIVE goverment bribes to get them to not stamp this a monopoly
|
Originally Posted by NorthernPilot1
(Post 4011643)
This is not true. It was Relative until the announcement date, then DOH for all the new hires after that date.
|
Originally Posted by Birdsmash
(Post 4011709)
It was all based on DOH. Pilots hired after the announcement were integrated in order of their employee number which was based on DOH and seniority within the class (oldest most senior). As a very senior Southern pilot I lost relative seniority due to DOH once we integrated. In the end it didn’t make much difference within my fleet and monthly bidding.
If you've ever looked at the master seniority list, you'd notice that there's both a seniority number and an employee number. Because the employee number doesn't mean anything. No one lost anything but maybe a number or two in relative seniority since everyone that was hired before the merger was integrated based on their relative seniority. Anything else would have violated McCaskill-Bond. If you were 10% at southern, I bet anything you're 9-11% at Atlas. |
Originally Posted by NorthernPilot1
(Post 4023540)
Lol, maybe you should look into how it was done. Because nothing you just said is true. You'd know that if you spent 5 minutes looking at the seniority list. First employee numbers are not based on DOH and seniority in class. You're assigned one based on the order in which you were hired. The seniority attached to it is then based on DOH and seniority in class. For example, I was the most junior in my class, but I have the 2nd lowest employee number. There's also a handful of people that left and came back. They have their original employee number.
If you've ever looked at the master seniority list, you'd notice that there's both a seniority number and an employee number. Because the employee number doesn't mean anything. No one lost anything but maybe a number or two in relative seniority since everyone that was hired before the merger was integrated based on their relative seniority. Anything else would have violated McCaskill-Bond. If you were 10% at southern, I bet anything you're 9-11% at Atlas. |
https://i.postimg.cc/Pq8CdT4k/IMG-2122.jpg
For 95% of things this holds pretty true, factor they haven’t added pilots in like 3 yrs and the overtime has been nearly nil lately. It’s like trying to surf a stagnant pond if you ain’t old enough for the Denny’s discount |
Easy Fix, despite having many friends at Purple we need a training fence for a long time regarding the 74.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands