Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
FAA loses on botched drug test… >

FAA loses on botched drug test…

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

FAA loses on botched drug test…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2022, 03:17 PM
  #1  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,498
Default FAA loses on botched drug test…

https://simpleflying.com/national-transportation-safety-board-judge-sides-american-airlines-pilot-lost-job-pilot-license/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tedreed/2022/10/31/courts-side-with-american-airlines-pilot-fired-after-he-declined-flawed-drug-test-request/?sh=150a2f818743


Although it’s sort of a Pyrrhic victory for the poor pilot.

an excerpt:

Courts Side With American Airlines Pilot Fired After He Declined Flawed Drug Test Request

DeWitt Ingram, a 21-year American pilot, wants his life back.

In August 2020, Ingram, 64, became trapped in a nightmarish scenario involving a botched attempt by an employee of a ground services company. The employee sought to notify him to take a random drug test after a flight to Miami. She didn’t know his name and apparently thought he was somebody else.

Pilots are routinely administered random drug and alcohol tests. But under the circumstances, Ingram declined to be tested. Two months later, American fired him. Then the Federal Aviation Administration revoked his pilot license.

He has lived in limbo ever since. Unable to work in his profession, he spent his life savings. “That night was the end of all pay and benefits,” Ingram said. “I’ve exhausted my 401K and sold stock and two cars to survive.

Whatever the outcome, Ingram will never fly for American again. He cannot be retrained quickly enough to fly before his 65th birthday in January. The grievance and the civil suit will establish whether there is liability for American and Eulen America, the ground services company that employed the woman who mistakenly notified him that he should be tested. American declined to comment. Eulen did not respond to emails.
Excargodog is online now  
Old 10-31-2022, 03:38 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,594
Thumbs down

Both of those articles were so ****poorly written that it was nearly impossible to discern the chain of facts in the case....
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 10-31-2022, 05:18 PM
  #3  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,498
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Both of those articles were so ****poorly written that it was nearly impossible to discern the chain of facts in the case....
I agree, but the more descriptive articles are all behind paywalls. The gist appears to be that the subcontractor hired by AAL to administer their random drug test fouled up and didn’t know who they were really supposed to random test. The person notifying the pilot allegedly used the wrong name and the pilot said that wasn’t him so he didn’t take the test. The person doing the notifying allegedly notified the company and the FAA that the pilot had refused to take the random test. the pilot has won his case against the FAA in NTSB court but has civil cases pending against AA, the subcontractor, and the individual who stated that he refused the test. That’s his story, anyway, and he has convinced the NTSB judge that the FAA PULLED HIS CERTIFICATES WITHOUT JUST CAUSE.
Excargodog is online now  
Old 10-31-2022, 05:56 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 42
Default

He’s not the only one
oldrebel is offline  
Old 10-31-2022, 06:12 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 443
Default

I would have thought someone somewhere in the chain would be smart enough to do the right thing.
Round Luggage is offline  
Old 11-01-2022, 05:49 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

Hard to tell if he was 64 in 2020 or now but either way within a couple years of retirement and “burn through” your 401k in 2 years? What was the game plan if he had flown to 65?
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 11-01-2022, 06:12 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,594
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
I agree, but the more descriptive articles are all behind paywalls. The gist appears to be that the subcontractor hired by AAL to administer their random drug test fouled up and didn’t know who they were really supposed to random test. The person notifying the pilot allegedly used the wrong name and the pilot said that wasn’t him so he didn’t take the test. The person doing the notifying allegedly notified the company and the FAA that the pilot had refused to take the random test. the pilot has won his case against the FAA in NTSB court but has civil cases pending against AA, the subcontractor, and the individual who stated that he refused the test. That’s his story, anyway, and he has convinced the NTSB judge that the FAA PULLED HIS CERTIFICATES WITHOUT JUST CAUSE.
If those facts are true, then I hope he sues the living crap out of everyone involved and wins a massive settlement.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 11-01-2022, 06:13 AM
  #8  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,498
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
Hard to tell if he was 64 in 2020 or now but either way within a couple years of retirement and “burn through” your 401k in 2 years? What was the game plan if he had flown to 65?
Not that familiar with the intricacies of AAs retirement rules but that old, he might have still been entitled to a conventional a/b fund pension which might have been forfeited if he was fired for cause. In that period of time the legacies were incentivizing the shedding a lot of senior people they didn’t think they were going to need before they retired. Getting rid of one at no cost might have seemed like a windfall of sorts. But either way, it cost him what should have been his two most senior years at the airline. Even if he planned poorly for retirement, he shouldn’t lose that over someone else’s misstatement or clerical error, if that’s what really happened.

And lawyer costs ain’t cheap either.
Excargodog is online now  
Old 11-01-2022, 09:35 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 138
Default

So is APA paying all his legal bills? I hops so. They absolutely should be. The testing company, the FAA, and AA need to payout MILLIONS in punitive damages to him.

Any idea when that'll go to trial?
Earthboundmsfit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
American
8
07-18-2018 04:03 AM
Naven
Cargo
26
02-14-2013 10:49 AM
LowSlowT2
Aviation Law
1
08-18-2011 03:45 AM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
0
03-08-2006 06:56 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices