Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
High Altitude/High Performance >

High Altitude/High Performance

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

High Altitude/High Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2009, 05:40 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Default High Altitude/High Performance

I am a soon to be furloughed pilot. I have flown the Dash 8 for a little more than a year and a half. Never have I gotten a high altitude or high performance as it is not required for 121. Even though I have proven that I can operate an aircraft that is high altitude and high performance, will I need to go out and get one in order to find a job such as 135 cargo or King Air?
dashtrash300 is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 08:25 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,216
Default

In 91 you will need the endorsement because it is a PIC endorsement, so your 121 SIC training does not count.

But actually, if you fly with a CA who is a CFI (a real CFI, not an ATP giving instruction) he might be willing to give you the endorsement. You just log the flight and ground training (the "ground" would be conducted in cruise flight of course). The grey area here is emergency descent procedures...obviously you may not want to do the full procedure on a revenue flight. Maybe a repo flight?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 09:26 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

The dash is not high alt. It does not climb above 25,000'.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 03:26 PM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,216
Default

Well so much for that idea. The good news is that the endorsement is so easy to do that a prospective employer should have no problem knocking it out during your training. As you pointed out, you already know how to fly a pressurized turboprop...the HA endorsement should not be a deal breaker.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 05:35 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Default

As a follow up question, I never did the hi-alt endorsement either, got hired and flew the SAAB (no need for hi-alt) then went to work for a compnay who gave me a A320 type (PIC even though I fly SIC). I did train the hi-alt stuff, and it is in my training records. Do those records count as an endorsement or would I have to get an endorsement to fly something else Pt 91 or 135?
Left Handed is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 08:40 PM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,216
Default

If you have a 320 PIC type from a US 121 (or 135) operator, that counts. You probably do not need any additional documentation, if the question ever came up you could show them your pilot cert with the type. It's remotely possible they might ask where you got the type, since a type acquired overseas or at a school would not count because of the way the regs are worded (121 or 135 only IIRC). The worst they could do would be to ask for documentation from the airline, but a copy of the 8710 should do the trick (which they should have anyway).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-30-2009, 02:36 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 38
Default

Someone answer me this... 61.31(g) talk about not needing a high alt endorsement unless you fly a "pressurized aircraft." But out in the parenthesis it says that "(an aircraft that has a service ceiling or maxiumum operating altitude, whichever is lower, above 25,000)". Lets say for instance we are flying a Turbo B58 and the service cig is 280.. would you need a high atl endorsement if it's not pressurized?
Jowersman is offline  
Old 08-30-2009, 06:32 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by Jowersman View Post
Someone answer me this... 61.31(g) talk about not needing a high alt endorsement unless you fly a "pressurized aircraft." But out in the parenthesis it says that "(an aircraft that has a service ceiling or maxiumum operating altitude, whichever is lower, above 25,000)". Lets say for instance we are flying a Turbo B58 and the service cig is 280.. would you need a high atl endorsement if it's not pressurized?
My understanding (which could be wrong) is that it applies to a pressurized aircraft with more than a 25k sc. The training involves de-pressurization emergencies.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 08-31-2009, 06:53 AM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,216
Default

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it only applies to pressurized aircraft.

It's also worth noting that you need the endorsement to fly such an airplane at ANY altitude...you cannot even do a low altitude flight without the endorsement.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Engineers & Technicians
162
10-18-2014 02:29 PM
capncrunch
Major
37
06-03-2009 07:13 AM
SkyHigh
Regional
96
05-15-2009 07:51 AM
mxaexm
Flight Schools and Training
1
03-22-2009 12:16 PM
CaptainTeezy
Aviation Law
7
11-18-2008 02:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices