Age 65 rule to be looked at again. A Press
#4
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Correct me if I'm wrong (really!), but wasn't the change in the age 65 rule a result of international pressure to come into compliance with European standards? If so, I suspect it won't be as easy to reverse as you might think. Plus, it would be awfully unfair to any pilot 55+ who has to once again revise his retirement planning.
On a broader note, you have to hand it to Europeans. They took the lead on RVSM years before the US, and the EU (and the UK, especially) has already moved to rework flight/duty/rest requirements. We can only hope the US follows that last . . .
On a broader note, you have to hand it to Europeans. They took the lead on RVSM years before the US, and the EU (and the UK, especially) has already moved to rework flight/duty/rest requirements. We can only hope the US follows that last . . .
#5
Age 65 is the ICAO standard. It would take multiple smoking-holds accidents to get it reversed in the US.
Move along, nothing to see here :rolleyes:
Move along, nothing to see here :rolleyes:
Last edited by rickair7777; 06-20-2009 at 03:37 PM.
#6
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
I wonder what the stats will be 15 years from now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post