Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Boeing CEO says they are going autonomous >

Boeing CEO says they are going autonomous

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Boeing CEO says they are going autonomous

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2023, 07:07 AM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by madmax757 View Post
When I flew corporate, my boss was an F18
guy. He had lots of dual time in the 2 seat version and simulator b4 they tossed him the keys to a shiny new F18 and land on a carrier in bad weather. I’m guessing even though the airliner may be single pilot , there will still be a right seat with controls for training and check rides .
The benefit, and arguably, the need for 2-pilots isn't just during initial training and checkrides, rather it is rest of the mentoring and techniques (both good & bad) that it provides in daily line flying. To the point about your hornet driver boss, how long was he a wingman and what percentage of his flights were flown single ship? CRM/mutual support is a thing even in single seat fighters. The mishap rate for those fighters are also a little bit above the acceptable limit for commercial carriers.
WXS15 is offline  
Old 02-13-2023, 08:06 AM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: 73FO
Posts: 306
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Airbus is the one to watch.

I’d like to see military non combat loss stats on their remotely piloted aircraft. Seems like datalink isn’t an issue for them.
USAF drones crash at a rate like 4x more frequent than military manned aircraft mishaps. That’s 4 times higher vs high risk flying ops like single pilot, single engine fighters, cargo aircraft routinely flying tactical ie unstable approaches, helicopters on night vision goggles 100’ AGL, training aircraft flying in formation with a sub 100 hr pilot at the controls, flying aircraft that are 50+ years old, etc. That’s also with a dedicated network of satellites to provide bandwidth and control.
BlueScholar is offline  
Old 02-13-2023, 10:34 AM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 796
Default

Originally Posted by BlueScholar View Post
USAF drones crash at a rate like 4x more frequent than military manned aircraft mishaps. That’s 4 times higher vs high risk flying ops like single pilot, single engine fighters, cargo aircraft routinely flying tactical ie unstable approaches, helicopters on night vision goggles 100’ AGL, training aircraft flying in formation with a sub 100 hr pilot at the controls, flying aircraft that are 50+ years old, etc. That’s also with a dedicated network of satellites to provide bandwidth and control.
Yup. Biggest issue is not allowing a third rate safety person (pilot?) in as the relief pilot. There will certainly be a second person in the cockpit in the A350 example. Just have to defend and justify the need for that person to be more than a mindless canary that calls for help.
PineappleXpres is online now  
Old 02-19-2023, 03:42 AM
  #184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

This is a good read. If the aircraft were autonomous would they have detected the tail strike and returned? Would thru understand it was garbage data?

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/after-alaska-airlines-planes-bump-runway-a-scramble-to-pull-the-plug/
pangolin is offline  
Old 02-19-2023, 09:38 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,979
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
This is a good read. If the aircraft were autonomous would they have detected the tail strike and returned?
If it was autonomous, there'd likely be pitch limits on takeoff that can't be exceeded.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 02-19-2023, 11:21 PM
  #186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,231
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
If it was autonomous, there'd likely be pitch limits on takeoff that can't be exceeded.
Until it is exceeded
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 02-20-2023, 09:34 AM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer View Post
Until it is exceeded
Agreed.

They pitched exactly to the programmed pitch. The numbers were wrong. The robot would get it wrong. And MOST crews caught something was wonky.
pangolin is offline  
Old 02-20-2023, 10:41 AM
  #188  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
If it was autonomous, there'd likely be pitch limits on takeoff that can't be exceeded.
So what happens in the scenario above?

V1 (have to keep going now)
VR
Pitch up to preset limit
Too slow to fly
Go off the end at high speed at your preset pitch limit. That would be very bad in SEA.

Sometimes scrapping the tail is the lesser evil, I'm sure Van Zanten scrapped his tail but at least he was trying to miss Pan Am.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-20-2023, 06:12 PM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,979
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
So what happens in the scenario above?

V1 (have to keep going now)
VR
Pitch up to preset limit
Too slow to fly
Go off the end at high speed at your preset pitch limit. That would be very bad in SEA.

Sometimes scrapping the tail is the lesser evil, I'm sure Van Zanten scrapped his tail but at least he was trying to miss Pan Am.
If it's too slow to fly, pitching up higher isn't going to improve things. I'd assume it would calculate that it "can't make it" and go into an abort mode. Aborting above V1 is not typical, but there are a few situations where it might be necessary. This would probably be a lot more rare though, because how did you get to V1 if your acceleration was too low to get you to V2? If acceleration to V1 was off, it would probably already have aborted.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 02-20-2023, 06:28 PM
  #190  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,459
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
If it's too slow to fly, pitching up higher isn't going to improve things. I'd assume it would calculate that it "can't make it" and go into an abort mode. Aborting above V1 is not typical, but there are a few situations where it might be necessary. This would probably be a lot more rare though, because how did you get to V1 if your acceleration was too low to get you to V2? If acceleration to V1 was off, it would probably already have aborted.
Since this has never been done, AI would not know about it. So you are talking about a hypothetical scenario. AI would freeze in this situation and just crash.

Please understand, there is no I in AI. It simply processes data provided to it. AI can't make any decisions. If it is presented with a situation never experienced before, it will not render a solution.
dera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Major
24
11-10-2022 07:01 PM
docav8tor
Safety
0
10-02-2019 02:07 PM
docav8tor
Safety
6
08-02-2019 07:58 AM
iceman49
Union Talk
11
12-06-2013 10:19 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices