Shot at endeavor 5 checkride failures.
#41
I learned as an Instructor too that day.
#42
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 28
I like how some people like to come here and boost their own ego.
It already happened and you can't change that...just build your time and apply. Prepare for the interview and that's it.
Btw, how was your examiner in DAB? I'm pretty sure I know him and he is an ******* trying to collect your money, however that's not what you say at an interview
It already happened and you can't change that...just build your time and apply. Prepare for the interview and that's it.
Btw, how was your examiner in DAB? I'm pretty sure I know him and he is an ******* trying to collect your money, however that's not what you say at an interview
#43
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 28
I dont think the checkrides will be the problem,some people just dont test well, the problem is going to be your complete lack of ownership. Any interviewer (121/135/91) is going to ask you about the failures. Giving the answers that you are giving here are not going to go down well. Taking checkrides for CFI and Comm but dont know how to do co-ordinated turns? Aircraft unusually heavy??
Sit down and think of the truthful answers to the questions. Be extremely prepared for the grilling they will probably give you if you apply. Endeavor may be out of your reach at this time, but hey, there is always Mesa!
Sit down and think of the truthful answers to the questions. Be extremely prepared for the grilling they will probably give you if you apply. Endeavor may be out of your reach at this time, but hey, there is always Mesa!
#44
Layover Master
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
Because it's so easy to look for traffic, then look beyond and see other traffic.
Not just a good idea. It's the law.
Midair collisions happen because of failure to see and avoid.
See and avoid applies equally to student pilots and professionals. A mid-air collision won't discriminate, hence the reason for the law.
Not just a good idea. It's the law.
Midair collisions happen because of failure to see and avoid.
See and avoid applies equally to student pilots and professionals. A mid-air collision won't discriminate, hence the reason for the law.
#45
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
There are a lot of dead pilots who thought see and avoid wasn't a big deal.
Again, It's BASIC AIRMANSHIP.
I'm sick to death of hearing "got him on the fish finder," which means exactly jack squat, or the assumption that radios do the looking ("any inbound traffic, please advise"). Lots of dead pilots learned one final lesson the hard way. It's equally applicable to students as to the most seasoned professional. Same standard.
Same penalty for failure to do so..
#46
Layover Master
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
If you think see and avoid is an exceptional standard open only to the elite, turn in whatever level of pilot certification you have and start over.
There are a lot of dead pilots who thought see and avoid wasn't a big deal.
Again, It's BASIC AIRMANSHIP.
I'm sick to death of hearing "got him on the fish finder," which means exactly jack squat, or the assumption that radios do the looking ("any inbound traffic, please advise"). Lots of dead pilots learned one final lesson the hard way. It's equally applicable to students as to the most seasoned professional. Same standard.
Same penalty for failure to do so..
There are a lot of dead pilots who thought see and avoid wasn't a big deal.
Again, It's BASIC AIRMANSHIP.
I'm sick to death of hearing "got him on the fish finder," which means exactly jack squat, or the assumption that radios do the looking ("any inbound traffic, please advise"). Lots of dead pilots learned one final lesson the hard way. It's equally applicable to students as to the most seasoned professional. Same standard.
Same penalty for failure to do so..
Jeezus. This has NOTHING to do with TCAS and your personal vendetta against pilots using it to identify traffic.
#47
Yeah, unless tower was real explicit I see how that could happen to an inexperienced pilot. "You're number three, lear traffic on final at 9 oclock, traffic to follow citation base-to-final at your 11 oclock.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 140
But good grief, after reading this post, what you mentioned is all I could think of. Failed checkride for not identifying the right runway on an approach. Failing for not using the rudder because he didn't have rudder trim? What? Afraid of flying under a cloud peeking through the foggles instead of paying attention to the approach? wtf. It looks like he failed because his airmanship sucks, and he didn't learn anything from the failures because he apparently failed his was through all his ratings. And to think some unfortunate student spending thousands of dollars ended up with this guy as his instructor. You sir have no business being at any control station of any airplane, nevermind a commercial airliner. It's not about being mean, you have people's lives in your hands. If you suck that bad, get out of aviation and find a job where you can't kill anyone. Or apply to be a FA if you want to be on an airplane.
#50
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
You appear to have missed the point, as it's gone well over your head.
You may need to start student training once again. You've missed some very basic elements that ought not be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post