Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Race and gender in hiring practices. >

Race and gender in hiring practices.

Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Race and gender in hiring practices.

Old 05-23-2019, 08:40 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
White men are not necessarily disadvantaged.

People from lower socio-economic classes are disadvantaged: due to lack of exposure to aviation at an early age, as well as lack of role models, motivation sources and ... well, money.

To change the filter and muddy the waters by substituting race for economic status in the analysis is a travesty.
I’d bet that, even controlling for socioeconomic status, we wouldn’t have a huge hiring preference for non-white and non-male pilots.

That doesn’t seem to stop people here from complaining about how easy minorities have it in aviation or that they are “displacing” people who should have the job instead.
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 08:42 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
I’d bet that, even controlling for socioeconomic status, we wouldn’t have a huge hiring preference for non-white and non-male pilots.
You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 08:48 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.
We already have the numbers. Just look at your seniority list and figure out the percentage of women. Then compare that to the FAA database.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 09:55 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.
I think I’ve been fairly consistent in saying that nobody has statistics either way. When you make an affirmative claim that white males are disadvantaged and/or displaced, you should support it with evidence. Generally, one doesn’t provide evidence to hold a skeptical position. Hence the “prove god doesn’t exist” logical fallacy that many theists run into.
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 10:11 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
We already have the numbers. Just look at your seniority list and figure out the percentage of women. Then compare that to the FAA database.
Garbage in. Garbage out. No one is disputing there are more men than women pilots. People are disputing the hurdles and difficulties various people face.

How many women even want to be pilots? No one has any access to the data. What’s the percentage of women who start out Day 1 in flight school and make it to a major 10 years later? What’s the percentage of men? Of minorities.

Just because there are fewer doesn’t mean they have a tougher journey.

How many men are beauticians?
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 11:06 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
People are disputing the hurdles and difficulties various people face.
Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 11:35 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.
Point taken. Without valid statistics this issue will never be resolved.

Cheers.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 11:46 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.
This assumes an even distribution throughout the age and seniority spectrum. That seems unlikely
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 01:24 PM
  #89  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,001
Default

It has little to do with hurt feelings about displacement.

If someone has achieved their seat in the cockpit because they bought it, or because they're ethnic, or because of their gender, or any reason other than they're well qualified for the position, they become a weak link. Nobody wants to be saddled with a weak link.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-23-2019, 03:00 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
It has little to do with hurt feelings about displacement.

If someone has achieved their seat in the cockpit because they bought it, or because they're ethnic, or because of their gender, or any reason other than they're well qualified for the position, they become a weak link. Nobody wants to be saddled with a weak link.
Please provide any evidence at all that this is a problem.
OOfff is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robthree
Hiring News
103
08-26-2012 10:14 PM
CE750
Major
97
11-28-2006 03:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices