Big 4 Career Goal: 135 vs 121 TPIC
#21
I would avoid the FAR 135 segment of the industry if at all possible.
I'm at a legacy airline now, but spent the majority of my career in the FAR 135 world. It's nice to have biz jet experience as a fall back when the industry tanks (COVID being the most recent example), but in general I find FAR 135 to be poor quality jobs, not enough regulation and standards and a lot of pilots that, quite frankly, are risky, dangerous and overall not good pilots.
I found FAR 135 to be very stressful and frequently dealt with a lot of drama that just doesn't exist in FAR 121. I'm not familiar with the regionals in the last 15 years, but I regret my FAR 135 experience. It definitely made my career progression more difficult.
I'm at a legacy airline now, but spent the majority of my career in the FAR 135 world. It's nice to have biz jet experience as a fall back when the industry tanks (COVID being the most recent example), but in general I find FAR 135 to be poor quality jobs, not enough regulation and standards and a lot of pilots that, quite frankly, are risky, dangerous and overall not good pilots.
I found FAR 135 to be very stressful and frequently dealt with a lot of drama that just doesn't exist in FAR 121. I'm not familiar with the regionals in the last 15 years, but I regret my FAR 135 experience. It definitely made my career progression more difficult.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 751
Here is my (cynical) view:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.43
135 PIC counts for nothing unless it’s 10+ seats or commuter operations aka “scheduled 135”.
I don’t see how 135 PIC time on your average rent-a-jet would do him any favors.
I have 135 PIC jet time and it’s has done zero for me.
I used to fly with somebody from the Regionals and he went 135 for the exact reasons He mentioned and last time I saw him he was still there.
Couldn’t handle the $30k+ pay cut it to go back to first year 121.
Your friend is 121, stay there.
No 135 that I know off will put you in the left seat on day 1,
You’ll spend a year right seat.
So you’re not gaining anything.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.43
135 PIC counts for nothing unless it’s 10+ seats or commuter operations aka “scheduled 135”.
I don’t see how 135 PIC time on your average rent-a-jet would do him any favors.
I have 135 PIC jet time and it’s has done zero for me.
I used to fly with somebody from the Regionals and he went 135 for the exact reasons He mentioned and last time I saw him he was still there.
Couldn’t handle the $30k+ pay cut it to go back to first year 121.
Your friend is 121, stay there.
No 135 that I know off will put you in the left seat on day 1,
You’ll spend a year right seat.
So you’re not gaining anything.
I had 135 TPIC in citations that had 7 seats... got hired at a major 121. Did legality change in the last 2 years?
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 751
FWIW, I also went 135 to Major 121.
I was a check and assistant chief pilot for the last 135. Everyone in my interview class at my current place was either in standards, check airman, training or something that was more than just a line pilot.
#24
I think s/he’s just referring to the flight experience requirements to upgrade and act as PIC under 121. A pilot needs to have 1000 SIC operating under 121 in order to be qualified to act as PIC under 121. There are a few things that can substitute or compliment the 1000 SIC requirement. One of them is PIC time in a turbojet/fan operated under 135, but the aircraft must have 10 or more seats. So, he is technically right that your citation PIC time would not count towards upgrade requirements if push came to shove. Someone generally won’t have that problem if they went 135 to major though as they will have accrued plenty of 121 SIC by the time upgrade would come around anyway. It was more of a problem at the regional level during the last boom. In some cases, seniority list movement was so quick that a first officer’s seniority could hold a captain spot before they even met the experience requirements. In that situation it helped if they came in with some other form of qualifying experience at their time of hire (like the discussed 135 PIC time).
#27
New Hire
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Position: FO
Posts: 7
had a similar question for those with way more experience with this than me.... turned 24 not too long ago, 2400 TT / 1000 121 SIC.. What's the best career move at this point? At a stable regional & very grateful for it. However upgrade time seems to be very distant due to covid, stay or seek a 135? half of my BS completed but not sure I can afford to finish. thinking is I'd go somewhere with considerably more pay, finish degree, maybe log TPIC faster and try to take that to UA/SW/ etc...? Appreciate any advice/feedback...
#28
had a similar question for those with way more experience with this than me.... turned 24 not too long ago, 2400 TT / 1000 121 SIC.. What's the best career move at this point? At a stable regional & very grateful for it. However upgrade time seems to be very distant due to covid, stay or seek a 135? half of my BS completed but not sure I can afford to finish. thinking is I'd go somewhere with considerably more pay, finish degree, maybe log TPIC faster and try to take that to UA/SW/ etc...? Appreciate any advice/feedback...
#29
Probably depends on the regional. If it's a niche regional with little opportunity for growth and a stagnant seniority list then yeah it might make sense to go elsewhere. Bear in mind that 135 will take some hustle and has it's own warts as folks have mentioned here. Also possible that when hiring warms up at the majors that ULCC's will start taking regional FO's again like they did before covid. At your age it does make some sense to try to shoot for the legacy stars, since you'll have plenty of time to enjoy the left seat of a widebody.
He could likely scrape by on that, if he lived frugally...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Flight Schools and Training
12
10-30-2014 04:46 PM