![]() |
Originally Posted by Cubdriver
(Post 1393229)
Yoda, Citation, and other experts, what's your best wisdom on refusing to blow for a routine DUI stop? I had have heard pro and con along these lines-
Con (you should never blow at the traffic stop) • You are within your legal rights to refuse your breath being personal property in a legal sense, breathalyzing is poor (junk) science, and the latter I tend to believe based on my own experiments with one certified breathalyzer • They say only direct blood samples can show accurately what you have in your blood, and it is better to not supply the prosecutor breathalyzer data which also may be tampered by unscrupulous personnel. Pro says • You are likely to be assumed guilty and parked for a long time if you refuse a test, so just give it to them. Thoughts? Personally, I rarely drink. However a suggestion for pilots that do is absolutely to take a cab or use a designated driver or better yet, drink at home. Especially younger pilots have no idea how close they can come to sabotaging their careers. I have seen it happen. I know of a guy who went drinking to celebrate his initial CFI, that he received earlier in the day; DWI and career over... It's not just DWI the FAA is looking at either. It is anything alcohol or drug related. A drunk in public charge will screw you up just the same. Operating a bicycle, skate board or horse while intoxicated will also get one in trouble, as you are not on your feet, rather operating a conveyance which is generally a hightened charge... |
Con (you should never blow at the traffic stop) • You are within your legal rights to refuse your breath being personal property in a legal sense, breathalyzing is poor (junk) science, and the latter I tend to believe based on my own experiments with one certified breathalyzer It would be very unwise to refuse a breath test. If you tag positive, then you can always request a blood test. Better yet, don't drink and drive. I have zero sympathy for anyone who does. Ever. • They say only direct blood samples can show accurately what you have in your blood, and it is better to not supply the prosecutor breathalyzer data which also may be tampered by unscrupulous personnel. No one is going to tamper with a breath test any more than a blood test. Pro says • You are likely to be assumed guilty and parked for a long time if you refuse a test, so just give it to them. Thoughts? |
Originally Posted by Cubdriver
(Post 1393229)
Yoda, Citation, and other experts, what's your best wisdom on refusing to blow for a routine DUI stop? I had have heard pro and con along these lines-
Con (you should never blow at the traffic stop) • You are within your legal rights to refuse your breath being personal property in a legal sense, breathalyzing is poor (junk) science, and the latter I tend to believe based on my own experiments with one certified breathalyzer • They say only direct blood samples can show accurately what you have in your blood, and it is better to not supply the prosecutor breathalyzer data which also may be tampered by unscrupulous personnel. Pro says • You are likely to be assumed guilty and parked for a long time if you refuse a test, so just give it to them. Thoughts? Personally, I rarely drink. However a suggestion for pilots that do is absolutely to take a cab or use a designated driver or better yet, drink at home. Especially younger pilots have no idea how close they can come to sabotaging their careers. I have seen it happen. I know of a guy who went drinking to celebrate his initial CFI, that he received earlier in the day; DWI and career over... It's not just DWI the FAA is looking at either. It is anything alcohol or drug related. A drunk in public charge will screw you up just the same. Operating a bicycle, skate board or horse while intoxicated will also get one in trouble, as you are not on your feet, rather operating a conveyance which is generally a hightened charge... |
Originally Posted by twobecrazy
(Post 1393028)
I think I know what course of action I need to take next but would like some opinions before I continue.
Once again, I'm willing to fight as much as I can to make this happen as it has always been my dream. What do you think? Thanks! Sincerely, TBC |
Originally Posted by citation35hf
(Post 1393304)
Ok, Francis, a DUI is by no means a career ender.
|
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
(Post 1393290)
In most jurisdictions, you can be tagged for refusal to take an alcohol test. You may be able to get away with refusing to take the breath test, but you'll be subject to other forms of testing. Refusal to take a test can be grounds for suspension of driving privileges, and it can be grounds for refusal of employment.
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
(Post 1393290)
It would be very unwise to refuse a breath test. If you tag positive, then you can always request a blood test.
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
(Post 1393290)
No one is going to tamper with a breath test any more than a blood test.
|
Originally Posted by Yoda2
(Post 1393314)
First of all, be polite. Secondly, for many it has been. It depends on how it is handled and other circumstances; and you know that.
We have hired guys with more than one DUI at RAH recently, so once again, a DUI is by no means a career ender. |
Originally Posted by twobecrazy
(Post 1393074)
Sorry Sir, my mistake on saying training. I meant as soon as I am competitive. I was informed by BOTH that I don't need Instructor certs just focus on getting commercial and ME. Then I just need to take a CRJ course. That being said I plan on getting them anyways and instruct whenever able
|
Originally Posted by citation35hf
(Post 1393339)
First of all, I am not your child talking to grandma at dinner. So your "be polite" comment only makes me raise an eyebrow.
We have hired guys with more than one DUI at RAH recently, so once again, a DUI is by no means a career ender. |
First of all, I am not your child talking to grandma at dinner. We have hired guys with more than one DUI at RAH recently, so once again, a DUI is by no means a career ender. RAH isn't exactly a "career," either. Tag positive? There is no such wording in criminal law. Yes: if an additional test is requested, depending on the jurisdiction, it may be given. A subject, having failed a sobriety test, was often given a breathalyzer test, and could request, or be given, a blood test as well. It's not necessary, and not all jurisdictions will do that, but it is done. It's also worth noting that in some, but not all jurisdictions, one can agree to a blood test while requesting not to take a breath test. Yes, there are quite many ways in which a blood draw can be thrown out in court and that can prove very helpful in having a DUI dismissed. The word "tamper" should not be taken as literally as I believe you have done. Frankly, I'd just as soon see the drunk driver crucified. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands