Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Total Time Coming from 135? >

Total Time Coming from 135?

Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Total Time Coming from 135?

Old 01-19-2017, 04:18 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet View Post
If you want to work for an airline then go to the airlines. Flying 135 will get you crappy training at FSI, CAE, SimCom and maybe 300-400 hours a year. Apply to a well paying regional, get airline training, and fly 700-900 a year. I made the mistake of 135/91k and my peers are now senior captains while I'm a mid list FO.
This man (or woman) speaks the truth. I did the very same thing and while I learned from my mistakes I could not recover the time I lost. 135 SIC time is especially worthless and will not count toward 121 time required for upgrade
Quarryman is offline  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:41 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Airplanes
Posts: 1,377
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy View Post
Wow. Impressive. Explains why there have been more 121 Runway overruns in that last 10 years than 135...and that's at the majors. But I guess since your military you must know all. I do agree that regional pilots transition well, hell of a lot better than the military guys, but nowhere near as well as the 135 guys. That's comparing apples(135) to onions(regional). You do realize 135 encompasses more than your
Ma and pa shops, right? Atlas, Omni, Eastern, XO. Any time g a bell??? All doing way more complex flying than you've probably ever done. Btw, have you seen the quality of FOs greased up and sliding through the regionals these days? Oh prolly not bc you, I'm speculating, never touched an RJ or its crappy pay and lovely schedules.

Peace. Love. Happiness. 🙄
My experiences have nothing to do with 121 overruns at any carrier. You'd have to look at those specific incidents and not my resume. So, I don't think that explains anything.

I'm former military but I don't know everything. I can tell you quite a bit about a few olive green helicopters though but not everything.

I've never worked for nor have I trained any Atlas, Omni, or Eastern crews. Being large airplane operators I don't know if they're subject to 14 CFR 121, 125, 135, parts of those, or all of those. I am familiar with XO. They were our competitors when I flew for NetJets. You apparently failed to see my prior 91, 135, and 91k experiences. I flew Navajos, King Airs, Citations, and Learjets for almost 20 years before moving to 121. I've also been with a training center since just after the last major economic collapse. Multiple types, FOM/GOM's, OpSpecs, left seat, right seat, and IP. Hilton Head, Aspen, Eagle, Telluride, Sun Valley, Truckee, etc. Been there, done it, had a beer and BBQ, and left. Same as a lot of guys.

Now, none of this makes me a 'know it all' (but you did use 'your' instead of 'you're' above) but my experience is a bit wide ranging. I flew by a factor of 10:1 corporate/fractional/charter to airline and was offering my advice to the OP based upon my experience. I also relayed how flying 135/91/91k set back my airline career and cost me years of seniority which costs me money, schedules, vacation, etc.

And no, 135 guys don't do better transitioning to airline training. They struggle the most. I know, me and the other 3 guys in my class had to work much harder than our regional counterparts. They had been doing the job with ramp crews, gate agents, FA's, ramp control, etc where our experience was coffee/ice/paper, load the bags, and don't forget the Atlantic bucks. 135 guys aren't retarded but their experience is different and the transition will generally be more difficult.

I'll say it again, if the OP wants an airline career then go to work for the airlines. There is an incredible amount of hiring right now and getting in on the wrong side of this wave could be detrimental. Ask the Delta guys hired on the backside of '85-91 (IIRC).
Macjet is offline  
Old 01-19-2017, 02:46 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,191
Default

UA said one year that 94% of their civilian new hires came from Part 121 carriers. That left 6% for the Part 135, 91, sky divers, banner tows, foreign airlines, etc.

Do you want to jump in the 6% pool or the 94% pool?
Sliceback is offline  
Old 01-19-2017, 03:29 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy View Post
Wow. Impressive. Explains why there have been more 121 Runway overruns in that last 10 years than 135
Be careful with statistics. 99% of people that use statistics to win an argument don't have the expertise or training to actually understand what the numbers mean. You are attempting to use runway overruns as a measure of safety between 135 and 121.

Each major airline does about a million departures a year. No 135 company comes even close to that. That means that even if 121 and 135 operators all had the same accident RATE, then 121 would have more accidents. That doesn't mean that 121 is less safe.

Now since there is not comprehensive study to prove that 121 is less safe than 135, we are stuck with anecdotal stories.

I have done both and without a doubt, 121 is the better of the two. It is not that 135 is bad, some of the best pilots I have ever flown with are 135 pilots. The problem is there is very little oversight or cross company learning in the 135 world. While I met a bunch of great pilots in 135, I have come across a lot more unsafe pilots.

They probably could be great pilots if they were exposed to some of great things that 121 has that 135 doesn't. Most 135 companies don't have a large well-funded department whose job it is to go through thousands of hours of FDR data to find the close calls that the entire pilot group can benefit from learning about. And when it comes to "training" in 135, it is miles behind. Again, there are some great instructors and great programs, but there are also a lot of bad ones. I have actually stop lessons so I could teach the sim instructor stuff that a CFI should know. I would actually go into training with the PTS, numerous advisory circulars, and the AFM all bookmarked for the inevitable moment that the sim instructor made a mistake. I actually had to teach one what the significance of V2 was. Then I got to watch a pilot red screen on a two engine RNAV approach because AP wasn't available on a checkride. The instructor's response was, "Well you have a trip tomorrow and I'm sure you have done plenty of RNAVs before without an issue, so don't worry about it."

That being said, there is still a lot of good. You get to see some great places and there is way less company drama. If your goal is a major airline, then go to a 121 carrier. If decide you don't like it, look for one of the good 135 operators.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 01-19-2017, 04:35 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A-320
Posts: 680
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy View Post
I do agree that regional pilots transition well, hell of a lot better than the military guys, but nowhere near as well as the 135 guys. That's comparing apples(135) to onions(regional).
It honestly doesn't matter if you're wrong or right about who transitions better. All the matters is what HR at legacy thinks and they put 135 time at the bottom of the resume stack.
KC135 is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 06:28 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,191
Default

https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...Stats2014.aspx

2005-2014 accident rates average (+/-) -

121 135

flight hour(100,000) 0.18 1.5

departures(100,000) 0.31 0.8


Part 135 is 3-8x more dangerous using the NTSB accident rates.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:54 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by KC135 View Post
Why would you want to do that? Quite a few regionals now start off at $60k first year FO and some top out double that. Your resume will usually be at the bottom of the stack at majors with 135 vs 121.

I looked at Skywest. They seem to be the highest paying for entry level positions.

Can you point me toward a regional that offers 60K for first year FOs?

I'm in my late 30s and and I'm trying to fast track my career and get to where I want to be, establish myself financially and professionally, as fast as possible.
Lagoon is offline  
Old 01-21-2017, 10:47 AM
  #18  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

I've flown 135 for 2 years for 1000hrs.
Couldn't go to the Regionals because I had a mortgage to pay.
And now I don't need to.
135 is a 'known' entity for type rides, check rides and FAA oversight ( hopefully).
Find a big reputable company not some fly by night turkey jive operation.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 01-21-2017, 10:53 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy View Post
Ha! Are you effn kidding me?!? I've worked 2 regionals and now work for a reputable 135. Regional flying is for pu$$ies. If you want to actually become a pilot and have true flying skills along with truly understanding customer service...135. As a 121 regional bio you won't learn jack. PLENTY of girls and guys leaving for the legacies from my outfit. Training is hands down 10x that of 121 because you don't just jump through hoops, you truly learn the plane from professionals. Don't listen to this JA.



Plus we have way more fun ;0)


Amen brother.
Learflyer is offline  
Old 01-21-2017, 11:01 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

To add to MOGuy's side if things, I personally count about 35 people from our large 135 that went directly to a legacy airline.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Learflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJ85FO
Regional
34
04-17-2017 04:16 PM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
shimmydamp
Regional
39
04-01-2012 08:28 AM
lakehouse
Hiring News
32
08-24-2010 10:38 AM
teejay
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-17-2008 10:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices