Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Possible 777 and 748 order from UPS? >

Possible 777 and 748 order from UPS?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Possible 777 and 748 order from UPS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2007, 11:15 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Default A380 replacement

Soyathink is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 04:34 AM
  #32  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
Yea, and I've been at the chiropractors since my return last week
Just jumpseat on one of my 76 flights. You'll have a 50/50 chance at an adjustment on the landing.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 07:42 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,695
Default

Let's see, would that be the 50% of the landings that are yours <G>?
767pilot is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 07:43 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,695
Default

Originally Posted by TipsyMcStagger View Post
Hmmm...be careful what you wish for. As an east-coaster (north east) I get more days at home being based in SDFZ than I would being based in EWR/PHL. Tipsy
Better watch out for the captain on your next trip. I hear he can be an ass
767pilot is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 08:18 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TipsyMcStagger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
Better watch out for the captain on your next trip. I hear he can be an ass
Fortunately, you can't always believe everything you hear

Tipsy
TipsyMcStagger is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:07 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by Soyathink View Post
There have been several articles in Aviation Week over the years about the Air Force trying to sell a "civilianized" version of the C-17 (MD-17) to FedEx as a way to help keep the assembly line open and the costs/unit price down. The offer usually included guaranteed Air Force contracts ... obviously FedEx never "bit".

I'm sure you could search their website (or Google) for details ...

Mark
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:12 AM
  #37  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Too many engines.
 
Old 03-04-2007, 11:01 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,695
Default

It seems like a whole lot of uneeded complexity for what we do
767pilot is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 11:48 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brownwhalerider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: MD 11 FO
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
There have been several articles in Aviation Week over the years about the Air Force trying to sell a "civilianized" version of the C-17 (MD-17) to FedEx as a way to help keep the assembly line open and the costs/unit price down. The offer usually included guaranteed Air Force contracts ... obviously FedEx never "bit".

I'm sure you could search their website (or Google) for details ...

Mark

The other problem is the cost of the airplane is higher than other cargo planes, because of the drive on drive off capability. Both FedEx and UPS do not need this function, and the government would not buy off on a subsidy for the plane. That is what really killed the civilian version of the C17.
brownwhalerider is offline  
Old 03-04-2007, 12:56 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 983
Default

Plus you'll need to buy a fleet of tankers to get it anywhere.
Precontact is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices