Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Substitution for training >

Substitution for training

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Substitution for training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2007, 11:13 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Thumbs down Substitution for training

I just had my CMV1 with EFB and Recurrent Ground School earlier this month, and it looks like we no longer have pay protection (sub) for a trip dropped for training. I had a 6 day trip (worth 30 hours) dropped for the first three days of training (worth 13.5 hours). During the View/Add window there was nothing that fit even close to the original trip that was legal to fly so now I'm out the doe. From what Planning is telling me we gave substitution away in this case for the new contract yet there is a provision for it in section 25.H and Section 4.I.4.b. The compay is saying it is suppose to be treated as a Phase in Conflict now.

I did not protect min days off and I waived my intl. duty buffer for March.

Can anyone enlighten me more on this dilema?
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 03:32 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jaxman187's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 129
Default

You are correct. Training conflicts are now handled as drops. I just got bit by this also. Your only recourse is to pick up a makeup trip during the conflict resolution window. This change in the contract is a net loss or a giveback for more senior pilots who under the old system could force the company to pay sometimes 6 or more credit hours per day for training through protection of min days off and careful bidding. It appears that the devil is in the details or at least FedEx's interpretation of the details in this contract change.
Jaxman187 is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 03:42 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FDX aviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Vertical
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50 View Post
I just had my CMV1 with EFB and Recurrent Ground School earlier this month, and it looks like we no longer have pay protection (sub) for a trip dropped for training. I had a 6 day trip (worth 30 hours) dropped for the first three days of training (worth 13.5 hours). During the View/Add window there was nothing that fit even close to the original trip that was legal to fly so now I'm out the doe. From what Planning is telling me we gave substitution away in this case for the new contract yet there is a provision for it in section 25.H and Section 4.I.4.b. The compay is saying it is suppose to be treated as a Phase in Conflict now.

I did not protect min days off and I waived my intl. duty buffer for March.

Can anyone enlighten me more on this dilema?

DOH! Thanks for the heads up.
Sorry about your luck. But this is something that I didn't realize and was just about to bite me...
FDX aviator is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 04:37 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by Jaxman187 View Post
You are correct. Training conflicts are now handled as drops. I just got bit by this also. Your only recourse is to pick up a makeup trip during the conflict resolution window. This change in the contract is a net loss or a giveback for more senior pilots who under the old system could force the company to pay sometimes 6 or more credit hours per day for training through protection of min days off and careful bidding. It appears that the devil is in the details or at least FedEx's interpretation of the details in this contract change.
And there is nothing in open time to make it up with except disputed pairings.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 04:38 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
42GO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 330
Default

Originally Posted by FDX aviator View Post
DOH! Thanks for the heads up.
Sorry about your luck. But this is something that I didn't realize and was just about to bite me...
I wrote about this a couple weeks ago....basically you are going to work extra the number of days you are in training, 5 extra days in LAX, if you want to keep your BLG and NO ONE in the union or company said anything about this other than "read the contract".
I was on the phone with John Hunt for 30 minutes trying to tell him SOMEONE needs to explain these little "subtle" changes that are much larger than anyone let on. What are the next ones we find out about?
42GO is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:18 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
KAFTKTA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-777 F/O
Posts: 65
Default

Wow... Thanks for the post. I am bidding training for April and was about to fail bidding.
KAFTKTA is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:24 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USNFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD10 FO
Posts: 307
Default In some ways I think it's much better!

Originally Posted by FR8Hauler View Post
And there is nothing in open time to make it up with except disputed pairings.
When you conflict training with a trip. You get to "cherry pick" a make-up trip during the "View Add" Window. You do this before any VTOs are built.

Although not optimum, at least now we have control over recurrent training. Before, if you did not "protect minimum days off" They simply scheduled your training on your days off. If you did protect them. Futures decided which which trips they would drop. If they had dropped to, or wanted to drop a big trip, you pretty much got what they gave you on substitution.

This is actually works out to be great a deal for anyone junior. For example, you conflict an entire 15 day RA block with training. Then build yourself a line with open time during the View Add window. All before the the #1 VTO is ever built!
USNFDX is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:56 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
42GO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 330
Default

Originally Posted by USNFDX View Post
When you conflict training with a trip. You get to "cherry pick" a make-up trip during the "View Add" Window. You do this before any VTOs are built.

Although not optimum, at least now we have control over recurrent training. Before, if you did not "protect minimum days off" They simply scheduled your training on your days off. If you did protect them. Futures decided which which trips they would drop. If they had dropped to, or wanted to drop a big trip, you pretty much got what they gave you on substitution.

This is actually works out to be great a deal for anyone junior. For example, you conflict an entire 15 day RA block with training. Then build yourself a line with open time during the View Add window. All before the the #1 VTO is ever built!
To each his own, but the bottom line is if you want the BLG of your line and have training, your going to WORK EXTRA for less pay. THAT"S the bottom line.
42GO is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:01 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purple F/O's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 319
Default

Originally Posted by USNFDX View Post

This is actually works out to be great a deal for anyone junior. For example, you conflict an entire 15 day RA block with training. Then build yourself a line with open time during the View Add window. All before the the #1 VTO is ever built!

Ummm, if someone is junior enough that he gets a block of 15 days RA that he didn't want, then he would also be too junior to get the training dates that he wants.

If he is senior enough to bid that block of RA and conflict a training event with it, he was probably senior enough to get something good in the first place.

One of the downsides of this is that if you want reserve, but can't bid the training dates you want, you will be forced to pick up trips instead of stand reserve.

What happens if you can't make up the CH that were dropped? You make less money? That's a bad deal too. I really never understood what the advantage of this change was to the crew-force.
Purple F/O is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:32 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USNFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD10 FO
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Purple F/O View Post
Ummm, if someone is junior enough that he gets a block of 15 days RA that he didn't want, then he would also be too junior to get the training dates that he wants.

If he is senior enough to bid that block of RA and conflict a training event with it, he was probably senior enough to get something good in the first place.

One of the downsides of this is that if you want reserve, but can't bid the training dates you want, you will be forced to pick up trips instead of stand reserve.

What happens if you can't make up the CH that were dropped? You make less money? That's a bad deal too. I really never understood what the advantage of this change was to the crew-force.

Not Really,

Guys bidding about 90-92 % can hold a block of 15 RA days but no lines and bottom VTOs. They can probably get a training period somwhere in that block with a real nice 0500 show.

Granted this is an extreme example, but it runs the spectrum. At my relative seniority (70%) I can usually get a line with a Good trip, and Not so good trip. I nuke the bad one with recurrent , and then try an add a good one on either side of my training and limit my commutes. Or maybe I bid the block of RA and "Cherry pick" The HNL-SYD-SFS trip.

Yes, under the old system, You could "protect min days off" and get your substitution and retain your exact BLG. Training pay is now 4+30. So yes, if you do nothing you will lose 3CH or more, than under the old system. But your training and substitution where at the whim of futures. Training could be scheduled anytime other than vacation.

I'm not saying it's perfect, but it does have some advantages.
USNFDX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Buzzard
Cargo
13
02-05-2007 06:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices