First, kudos on having the gravitas to talk about your situation without divulging sensitive information. Simply saying you had to call the line a couple of times on here takes some guts. You also put a lot of thought into describing your situation too. Well done. I really respect that.
From what you describe, I see two potential failures. First, somehow the phone tree didn’t work as you expected. Perhaps this was simple human error? Perhaps there was a political dynamic involved? I don’t know. In either case the system seems to have failed when you needed it to work. You didn’t get a call. Perspective from folks answering the phones would be valuable in figuring out exactly what happened. The good news is that this first problem is self-correcting. Whether or not the system failed you, by describing your experience you can rest assured that people WILL respond the next time the emergency line is put to use. I think the second issue is one of expectations. This is more important, in my humble opinion. We need to advertise services we can deliver. By similar token, we need to educate our membership about the realities they’ll face if they have a bad day. Have we been over-selling our ability to respond? Is our membership equipped to handle themselves after an event when we think about the realistic burdens they may be under? Are we realistic about how people rise to an occasion they are trained for but may check out in the hours after they get to the hotel/hospital etc? Perhaps more proactive steps to educate our memebers of emergency response is in order? Do people know if may take a “lot” of work on their part to get a timely response? How well are these thins handled at other carriers,and what can we learn from them? These are things for us to consider in house. More bad events will happen. People cite turnover and new pilots, but just numbers (more planes, flying more hours) mean we have more dark event on the horizon. Now is the time for us to get out ahead of the curve to prevent the preventable and prepare for inevitable. The specifics are for an in-house discussion, but your story is valuable. Finally, we should probably remember that we don’t have the perspective of the folks who were answering phones that day. We don’t have a lot of perspectives in fact. This isn’t the place to officially lay blame or admit wrongdoing. I am glad I got a chance to listen to (read) your experience. |
One more thing. I can tell you’re angry. At the end of the day you’re one of us. Trash talk, tribes and all the other nonsense doesn’t matter. Ultimately we’re with you.
|
Originally Posted by Elevation
(Post 2650232)
The specifics are for an in-house discussion, but your story is valuable. Finally, we should probably remember that we don’t have the perspective of the folks who were answering phones that day. We don’t have a lot of perspectives in fact. This isn’t the place to officially lay blame or admit wrongdoing. I am glad I got a chance to listen to (read) your experience. As to perspective, I believe the ExCo Chair gave his during the mentioned membership crew call. BTW, we don't record them anymore since we lost the work action injunction. So I can't give you the link for his perspective, but it was pretty obvious to me and a number of others that emailed me afterwards that his actions were those of malice and not ineptitude. Considering all his other past actions, the case for malice is a forgone conclusion. |
Nothing will change at Atlas until you get rid of the bunch that are running your Exco. You are paying the highest dues of anybody so the chosen few can have prime rib and king prawns on your dime at every chance they get. If you post something they don't like, or God forbid try to change the by-laws, they throw you off the site altogether. :mad:
|
I think a lot of what you cite as wrong with our organization is common to a lot of other organizations too. Unchecked most organizations, squadrons, departments, etc. have a tendency to devolve into a glorified high school lunchroom. We can all think of many examples. Swapping out one set of people with weaknesses for another set of people with weaknesses won’t change anything except for the clique in charge. These problems are systemic, universal and persistent.
Rather than removing and replacing folks en masse perhaps we need to push for a general cultural change? Instead of slinging mud or commenting on mishaps, we need to state the facts when institutional failures occur. If we are going to drive any organization to function as advertised we have to function as advertised as well. I’m not saying we all need to be sanctimonious jerks, but I am saying that we ourselves have to be trustworthy for us to force trustworthiness into the union’s actions. That starts with being good to our FOs and FAs (or captains for recent hires). When you think about it, isn’t that what solidarity is all about? It takes a lot of energy, though. Sometimes you can get really worn down as folks want to trash talk your friends. That’s the cost of doing business, I guess. We’ll get there. |
Originally Posted by Elevation
(Post 2650771)
I think a lot of what you cite as wrong with our organization is common to a lot of other organizations too. Unchecked most organizations, squadrons, departments, etc. have a tendency to devolve into a glorified high school lunchroom. We can all think of many examples. Swapping out one set of people with weaknesses for another set of people with weaknesses won’t change anything except for the clique in charge. These problems are systemic, universal and persistent.
Rather than removing and replacing folks en masse perhaps we need to push for a general cultural change? Instead of slinging mud or commenting on mishaps, we need to state the facts when institutional failures occur. If we are going to drive any organization to function as advertised we have to function as advertised as well. I’m not saying we all need to be sanctimonious jerks, but I am saying that we ourselves have to be trustworthy for us to force trustworthiness into the union’s actions. That starts with being good to our FOs and FAs (or captains for recent hires). When you think about it, isn’t that what solidarity is all about? It takes a lot of energy, though. Sometimes you can get really worn down as folks want to trash talk your friends. That’s the cost of doing business, I guess. We’ll get there. The union is all of us. The union officers and chairs are all volunteer positions. Anyone can run for office. And they are all human, subject to imperfection and if there is a problem, there are good and bad ways to fix the problem. If something is broken it is best fixed it by being constructive - not divisive. We have all had problems at one point or another and the best results are the product of cooperation. Kind of like the way we are supposed to act as a crew in flight. |
The union is all of us but the ones with NDAs are extra union.
|
Here is where your dues money goes.
$11,000 for wine for a stewards meeting!
Kirchner , Robert EXCO Atlas $61,208 Bourne , David Airline Director/BA $81,955 Atlas Air Inc 2000 Westchester Ave Purchase NY flight pay loss $1,272,562 Law Office of Edward Gleason $436,902 Lionel Largmann $25,260 Chateau Elan Winery and Resort Braselton GA $10,824 steward meeting https://olms.dol-esa.gov/query/getOrgQryResult.do |
You know, I may be no expert on these things, but I think that Chateau Elan Winery and Resort is the name of the place and they offer more than just wine (and pretty much all hotels offer wine btw). Like I would imagine they have rooms you can pay for to sleep in and food that you can buy to eat. So if our stewards go someplace to meet, I am OK with paying for them to do that.
The way my math works out, $11,000 divided between 1750 pilots is about $7.00 out of my pocket for this meeting. This is about 70 cents per steward for our 10 stewards and that allows them to meet and figure out how best to represent me against an ever increasingly hostile company. A better question is why a retired guy even cares about whats happening here and why he has so much hostility towards our union ... |
Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER
(Post 2652501)
You know, I may be no expert on these things, but I think that Chateau Elan Winery and Resort is the name of the place and they offer more than just wine (and pretty much all hotels offer wine btw). Like I would imagine they have rooms you can pay for to sleep in and food that you can buy to eat. So if our stewards go someplace to meet, I am OK with paying for them to do that.
The way my math works out, $11,000 divided between 1750 pilots is about $7.00 out of my pocket for this meeting. This is about 70 cents per steward for our 10 stewards and that allows them to meet and figure out how best to represent me against an ever increasingly hostile company. A better question is why a retired guy even cares about whats happening here and why he has so much hostility towards our union ... I still have friends that work there and are tired of paying 2.5%. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands