Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Recent FedEx 767 delivery flight >

Recent FedEx 767 delivery flight

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Recent FedEx 767 delivery flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2018, 09:51 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,228
Default

The old parking brake argument will never hold up in court if sterile violations are suspected when you abort and go off the end. How do you prove the brake was set when you were snapping pics at the runway end?
The P brake argument is only for ops/MX calls. As always your operation may have variances approved or not allowed that take precedence.
So all you new RJ drivers go ahead and pull out your cell/sandwich/newspaper at the runway end, Big John on the Internet said it's OK as long as the P brake is set.

AC 120-74B is a good read

"(b) Remind all cockpit occupants of the importance of maintaining a sterile cockpit, but encourage the ability to speak up if anyone sees a potential conflict or interprets a clearance differently. Encourage jump seaters to monitor communications.
(c) When operating an aircraft that does not have a door between the flight deck and the passenger compartment, the pilot may need to ask passengers to maintain a sterile cockpit and refrain from unnecessary conversation from the time the preflight preparations begin until the time the aircraft is clear of the terminal area and at cruising altitude. "

"(k) Though the use of cell phones and other electrical devices are prohibited during commercial use of aircraft, use of cell phones or personal devices can be a valuable asset such as, communicating with maintenance, ATC, as well as obtaining realtime weather. Typically these uses should only be allowed on inactive taxi areas when stopped, or parked with engines shut down. It is important to assure that everyone present in the aircraft have their phones and devices turned off during taxi operations to prevent any distractions."

What say you JB? Hey BTW good job getting dead thread up to 3 pages!
Let's hope our banter gets some new (and old pilots) thinking about this.

Last edited by trip; 07-27-2018 at 10:32 AM.
trip is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 01:00 PM
  #22  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Default

Originally Posted by trip View Post
The old parking brake argument will never hold up in court if sterile violations are suspected when you abort and go off the end. How do you prove the brake was set when you were snapping pics at the runway end?
You're really dense enough to think that the B767 in the picture in this thread is going to slide off the end of the runway because one of the pilots takes a picture while holding short? You think it would have any bearing at all, or impact safety of flight, or become a legal issue in any way, shape, or form? You're not that dense, are you? Say it isn't so.

Were the aircraft or aircrew to have an issue and slide off the end for any number of reasons, the fact that the crew took a picture of four antiquated airplanes sitting on the end of the runway wouldn't have any impact at all. None.

But then you haven't been able to link or cite regulation stating otherwise, and let's face it, your citations are cropped, and sorely lacking. Chiefly ancedotal references to autofocus, cartoon flow charts, and references to what sixty thousand pilots might do. You do love the straw man.

It was your assertion, after all; you're unable to support it. This seems to upset you.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 01:37 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,228
Default

I'm not upset, I made a lighthearted statement about how airline pilots might not want to share pics with random requests or social media. You immediately resorted to name calling, ridicule and personal attacks as you usually do.
You provided zero references to back up your assertion that Pbrake equals a freebie.
If you can't read or comprehend I can't help you.
trip is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:00 PM
  #24  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Default

And still no citations. No support. No leg up on which to stand.

Yet you keep stomping those bloody stumps. Why is that?
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 12:32 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,187
Default

JB youre wrong, and need to look up the definitions and differences of a PED and EFB. The exact same device can be both and depending on how and when you use it can get you violated.

If you’re so confident, I dare you to start posting pictures on social media you’ve taken, especially during sterile cockpit times.

Trip, let him go... hopefully he’s senior to you.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 06:16 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
You've still provided no citation for your assertion.

Try to focus, if you can.

The thread involves a B767 parked, with four aircraft at the end of a runway. There is no regulatory prohibition against taking photographs from that position, and in response to your mistatement, I would take a picture with the FAA on board, as I have done. Most likely the FAA would either hand me their camera, or lean past me to take a picture. As has been done.

Still looking for your regulatory basis for "auto focus." Is that found in the sixty thousand pilots, too, or just the cartoon flow chart?
The auto focus isn't the point. It's whether or not the device you are using can transmit data wirelessly.

Originally Posted by 121.542(d)
(d) During all flight time as defined in 14 CFR 1.1, no flight crewmember may use, nor may any pilot in command permit the use of, a personal wireless communications device (as defined in 49 U.S.C. 44732(d)) or laptop computer while at a flight crewmember duty station unless the purpose is directly related to operation of the aircraft, or for emergency, safety-related, or employment-related communications, in accordance with air carrier procedures approved by the Administrator.
Originally Posted by 14 CFR 1.1
Flight time means:

(1) Pilot time that commences when an aircraft moves under its own power for the purpose of flight and ends when the aircraft comes to rest after landing;
Originally Posted by 49 U.S.C. 44732(d)
(d)Personal Wireless Communications Device Defined.—
In this section, the term “personal wireless communications device” means a device through which personal wireless services (as defined in section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(C)(i))) are transmitted.
So if you have started movement of the aircraft for the purpose of flight and are at a flight crewmember station, you can't use any device that transmits through a cell service, which would be all smartphone cameras and other cameras that transmit cellularly. If it's a camera that doesn't (old school SLR), you're probably good.

Of course, if it's Part 91, all that 121 stuff may not apply.
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 06:57 AM
  #27  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

Cell phones have airplane mode, so it doesn't transmit. Plus I bet 50% of the pax in back have their phones on, so I wouldn't worry about it screwing up an aircraft system. And if you can't take a pic while the other guy flies/taxis without crashing, perhaps you should choose a different career.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 07:26 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 View Post
So if you have started movement of the aircraft for the purpose of flight and are at a flight crewmember station, you can't use any device that transmits through a cell service, which would be all smartphone cameras and other cameras that transmit cellularly.
Ah, so just set the brake and get up (for any plausible reason ).
Now you are not at a flight crewmember station.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 07:30 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,465
Default

And if you can't take a pic while the other guy flies/taxis without crashing, perhaps you should choose a different career.
Because distraction during critical phases of flight has proven deadly & best practice crews work within the standards they've been qualified to.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 08:07 AM
  #30  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido View Post
Because distraction during critical phases of flight has proven deadly & best practice crews work within the standards they've been qualified to.
Sure, sending a text at 1000 AGL on an ILS to mins is probably not a good idea. Taking a pic of a B-25 while holding short of a taxiway most likely won't lead to anyone dying.

But you need to tailor the regs to the lowest common denominator, so therefore you get what we have.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
j3cub
Allegiant
6367
12-20-2020 08:01 AM
steamgauge
Cargo
95
03-24-2013 05:55 PM
CrakPipeOvrheat
Regional
94
02-12-2012 08:14 PM
Gunter
Cargo
58
11-21-2009 12:11 PM
vagabond
Cargo
15
03-18-2007 03:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices