Search
Notices

Atlas / Southern

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2019, 08:28 AM
  #261  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
Default

Can somebody honestly and objectively explain to me what the draw of Atlas is? I work in the overseas contracting world and every day it seems I hear about somebody who quit to go fly for Atlas. They quit a job paying $200,000 or more per year, where you work less than 8 hours a day, doing a pretty uncomplicated mission. Here is what I see as an outsider looking in:

-50 hour monthly guarantee 1st year which equates to pure garbage pay
-Imputed income for the gateway travel. NOT home-basing.
-Recruiting told me personally over the phone that upgrade time is 4 years...so probably longer than that in reality.
-On-going contract issues
-Atlas pilots still find themselves in the same ****-hole we live in now.
-$1600/month during training
-Last and certainly not least: why did that 767 crash in Texas? (god bless them and their families). There seems to be no apparent rush on finding the cause of that, at least that I can find. If you all have official info, please pass it along.

Seriously, why do pilots find themselves signing on the dotted line at Atlas or at Southern? Why wouldn't any experienced pilot with a few thousand hours walk right into better paying outfits with true home-basing like Wheels-up, NetJets, Flexjet? Is the chance to fly a 747/767? Out of all the operations I read about on these forums, Atlas by far seems to be the worst.

What secret is in the sauce that the rest of us outsiders are missing out on?
StandardBrief is offline  
Old 09-19-2019, 08:33 AM
  #262  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by StandardBrief View Post
Can somebody honestly and objectively explain to me what the draw of Atlas is? I work in the overseas contracting world and every day it seems I hear about somebody who quit to go fly for Atlas. They quit a job paying $200,000 or more per year, where you work less than 8 hours a day, doing a pretty uncomplicated mission. Here is what I see as an outsider looking in:

-50 hour monthly guarantee 1st year which equates to pure garbage pay
-Imputed income for the gateway travel. NOT home-basing.
-Recruiting told me personally over the phone that upgrade time is 4 years...so probably longer than that in reality.
-On-going contract issues
-Atlas pilots still find themselves in the same ****-hole we live in now.
-$1600/month during training
-Last and certainly not least: why did that 767 crash in Texas? (god bless them and their families). There seems to be no apparent rush on finding the cause of that, at least that I can find. If you all have official info, please pass it along.

Seriously, why do pilots find themselves signing on the dotted line at Atlas or at Southern? Why wouldn't any experienced pilot with a few thousand hours walk right into better paying outfits with true home-basing like Wheels-up, NetJets, Flexjet? Is the chance to fly a 747/767? Out of all the operations I read about on these forums, Atlas by far seems to be the worst.

What secret is in the sauce that the rest of us outsiders are missing out on?
Sounds like some info on the TX crash is coming soon..
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:31 AM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BluePAX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 386
Default

Originally Posted by StandardBrief View Post
Can somebody honestly and objectively explain to me what the draw of Atlas is? I work in the overseas contracting world and every day it seems I hear about somebody who quit to go fly for Atlas. They quit a job paying $200,000 or more per year, where you work less than 8 hours a day, doing a pretty uncomplicated mission. Here is what I see as an outsider looking in:

-50 hour monthly guarantee 1st year which equates to pure garbage pay
-Imputed income for the gateway travel. NOT home-basing.
-Recruiting told me personally over the phone that upgrade time is 4 years...so probably longer than that in reality.
-On-going contract issues
-Atlas pilots still find themselves in the same ****-hole we live in now.
-$1600/month during training
-Last and certainly not least: why did that 767 crash in Texas? (god bless them and their families). There seems to be no apparent rush on finding the cause of that, at least that I can find. If you all have official info, please pass it along.

Seriously, why do pilots find themselves signing on the dotted line at Atlas or at Southern? Why wouldn't any experienced pilot with a few thousand hours walk right into better paying outfits with true home-basing like Wheels-up, NetJets, Flexjet? Is the chance to fly a 747/767? Out of all the operations I read about on these forums, Atlas by far seems to be the worst.

What secret is in the sauce that the rest of us outsiders are missing out on?
If you have the PIC and a degree before Atlas then it may be your ticket for purple or brown.
BluePAX is offline  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:33 AM
  #264  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 493
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
Sounds like some info on the TX crash is coming soon..
And there is a significant amount of official information out there, as well as a very detailed unofficial synopsis that most people in the know agree with. The actual accident sequence is pretty well and believably documented at this point. What will be most interesting about the NTSB report is how and whether they are beginning to get to why. Or whether it instead falls into the category of you never know how someone's going to react in an emergency until they're confronted with a real one.
wjcandee is offline  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:46 AM
  #265  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by wjcandee View Post
And there is a significant amount of official information out there, as well as a very detailed unofficial synopsis that most people in the know agree with. The actual accident sequence is pretty well and believably documented at this point. What will be most interesting about the NTSB report is how and whether they are beginning to get to why. Or whether it instead falls into the category of you never know how someone's going to react in an emergency until they're confronted with a real one.
Should hear something by the end of the month...
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 09-20-2019, 09:30 AM
  #266  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: Old and Unemployed
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by wjcandee View Post
And there is a significant amount of official information out there, as well as a very detailed unofficial synopsis that most people in the know agree with. The actual accident sequence is pretty well and believably documented at this point. What will be most interesting about the NTSB report is how and whether they are beginning to get to why. Or whether it instead falls into the category of you never know how someone's going to react in an emergency until they're confronted with a real one.
One of the increasingly evident outcomes of the automation aviation world we now live in is that, while we know in training that the bad thing is coming and we are prepared to react, we are very complacent in our day to day flying lives. We believe that bad things are just a training event and will never happen outside the simulator.

When I was a freight puppy, bad things happened on an almost weekly basis. Shut down the engine, lose the hydraulics, etc... Just a fact of life flying in the back alleys of aviation. Now that we are all gentrified, we share the same traits as our passenger carrying brethren. A firm belief that nothing startling or scary will ever happen outside of the sim.

No detail revealing here, but I have some insight as to what went wrong in Texas. We as a pilot community need to reinforce ourselves about the fact that the starling thing can happen outside the sim. At work, after a long day. And, be truly prepared to deal with it.

Just sayin'
ocskyguy is offline  
Old 09-20-2019, 09:09 PM
  #267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by StandardBrief View Post
Can somebody honestly and objectively explain to me what the draw of Atlas is? I work in the overseas contracting world and every day it seems I hear about somebody who quit to go fly for Atlas. They quit a job paying $200,000 or more per year, where you work less than 8 hours a day, doing a pretty uncomplicated mission. Here is what I see as an outsider looking in:

-50 hour monthly guarantee 1st year which equates to pure garbage pay
-Imputed income for the gateway travel. NOT home-basing.
-Recruiting told me personally over the phone that upgrade time is 4 years...so probably longer than that in reality.
-On-going contract issues
-Atlas pilots still find themselves in the same ****-hole we live in now.
-$1600/month during training
-Last and certainly not least: why did that 767 crash in Texas? (god bless them and their families). There seems to be no apparent rush on finding the cause of that, at least that I can find. If you all have official info, please pass it along.

Seriously, why do pilots find themselves signing on the dotted line at Atlas or at Southern? Why wouldn't any experienced pilot with a few thousand hours walk right into better paying outfits with true home-basing like Wheels-up, NetJets, Flexjet? Is the chance to fly a 747/767? Out of all the operations I read about on these forums, Atlas by far seems to be the worst.

What secret is in the sauce that the rest of us outsiders are missing out on?
You have it fairly well scoped out at Atlas. There is no really sound and compelling reason to apply there as long as there are so many other good options out there that compensate and treat their pilots much better than Atlas.

And, yes, the big jet does seem to be an irresistible lure for some who have not yet learned that you should NEVER take a job for the equipment.
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 09-21-2019, 01:33 AM
  #268  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 698
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER View Post
You have it fairly well scoped out at Atlas. There is no really sound and compelling reason to apply there as long as there are so many other good options out there that compensate and treat their pilots much better than Atlas.

And, yes, the big jet does seem to be an irresistible lure for some who have not yet learned that you should NEVER take a job for the equipment.
Upgrade is shooting to never. Loss of flying and loss of A/C. I could easily see 767 upgrade over the 6-7 year mark.

I hate to say never, but I don’t see how a new hire would see 74 captain. Maybe 15 years
boeingdvr is offline  
Old 09-21-2019, 05:13 AM
  #269  
Pronounced Kep-Ten
 
CaptDave's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Left
Posts: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Stratocruzr View Post
DO NOT BELIEVE A WORD ATLAS HR tells you. They know nothing, and they only tell you what you want to hear.
For instance they’ve been saying we’re going to have a contract done soon to new employee prospects for the last 2 years.
Additionally the upgrade time that everyone else spoke of is true and getting longer. Not shorter.
Hahaha. Okay. Tell that to the most recent 73 upgrade awards that are all less than a year on property.

Contract issue has yet to be resolved but will at some point down the road.
CaptDave is offline  
Old 09-21-2019, 06:48 AM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by StandardBrief View Post
Can somebody honestly and objectively explain to me what the draw of Atlas is? I work in the overseas contracting world and every day it seems I hear about somebody who quit to go fly for Atlas. They quit a job paying $200,000 or more per year, where you work less than 8 hours a day, doing a pretty uncomplicated mission. Here is what I see as an outsider looking in:

-50 hour monthly guarantee 1st year which equates to pure garbage pay
-Imputed income for the gateway travel. NOT home-basing.
-Recruiting told me personally over the phone that upgrade time is 4 years...so probably longer than that in reality.
-On-going contract issues
-Atlas pilots still find themselves in the same ****-hole we live in now.
-$1600/month during training
-Last and certainly not least: why did that 767 crash in Texas? (god bless them and their families). There seems to be no apparent rush on finding the cause of that, at least that I can find. If you all have official info, please pass it along.

Seriously, why do pilots find themselves signing on the dotted line at Atlas or at Southern? Why wouldn't any experienced pilot with a few thousand hours walk right into better paying outfits with true home-basing like Wheels-up, NetJets, Flexjet? Is the chance to fly a 747/767? Out of all the operations I read about on these forums, Atlas by far seems to be the worst.

What secret is in the sauce that the rest of us outsiders are missing out on?
This kind of sounds like a management type question so perhaps you’ll get the answers you seek by conducting exit interviews and asking them questions face to face about how things could be improved at your operation to keep them there.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
verticalspeed
Part 135
5669
03-25-2024 04:02 PM
boeingdvr
Atlas/Polar
150
09-12-2018 06:14 PM
MD-11Loader
Atlas/Polar
212
05-06-2016 10:20 AM
MD-11Loader
Mergers and Acquisitions
1
01-30-2016 07:21 AM
EZRider
Cargo
2
03-09-2010 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices