Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
Atlas 767 went down in Houston >

Atlas 767 went down in Houston

Search
Notices

Atlas 767 went down in Houston

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2019, 04:06 AM
  #711  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
It does.....
I'll be damned, it was an option, some 200's had it.
No Land 3 is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 04:15 AM
  #712  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
I'll be damned, it was an option, some 200's had it.
It’s on all of our 300/300ERs too
tunes is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 04:41 AM
  #713  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
If you are responding to the control wheel steering question the 76 does have it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The reason I even bring it up is it might explain how the pitch can get so out of whack with the autopilot still “engaged”. Especially if it was a transfer of controls back and forth and one not realizing the other had selected CWS. If the airplane was trimmed in such a way that the descent angle continues to increase and one crew member is trying to manipulate the MCP to no avail, it might explain the conversation “consistent with loss of control” that the NTSB said was on the CVR...again, I’m just trying to counter the “ill intent” view with possibile scenarios...whatever the case, once that aircraft hit 49 degrees nose down, I don’t know if it would even be possible to recover from at that altitude...and my guess, getting it back to 20 degrees nose down at the end was probably a pretty aggressive maneuver in and of itself at those speeds and descent rates...
PeterGriffin is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 04:46 AM
  #714  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by PeterGriffin View Post
The reason I even bring it up is it might explain how the pitch can get so out of whack with the autopilot still “engaged”. Especially if it was a transfer of controls back and forth and one not realizing the other had selected CWS. If the airplane was trimmed in such a way that the descent angle continues to increase and one crew member is trying to manipulate the MCP to no avail, it might explain the conversation “consistent with loss of control” that the NTSB said was on the CVR...again, I’m just trying to counter the “ill intent” view with possibile scenarios...whatever the case, once that aircraft hit 49 degrees nose down, I don’t know if it would even be possible to recover from at that altitude...and my guess, getting it back to 20 degrees nose down at the end was probably a pretty aggressive maneuver in itself at those speeds and descent rates...


I've never messed with CWS so no idea. That being said when I was messing with stuff in the sim if the airplane is trimmed and you push to -50 and let go (without automation on) it will self correct to about -20 at about 700 ft.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 06:35 AM
  #715  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Could it have been something as simple as the aircraft flying into a massive downdraft/wind shear with the autopilot engaged with an altitude select function still engaged as well? The autopilot's reaction was at odds with what normally have been done manually, namely level the nose and apply a lot of power to arrest the descent. The airplane basically stalled, they punched off the autopilot and added max power but it was too late.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 06:50 AM
  #716  
Gets Weekends Off
 
lear 31 pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Left
Posts: 325
Default

Or we could just let the NTSB investigate and find out what really happened. But keep up the MS Flight Sim investigation 🙄🙄🙄🙄 it’s super professional of you.
lear 31 pilot is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 06:52 AM
  #717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx View Post
Could it have been something as simple as the aircraft flying into a massive downdraft/wind shear with the autopilot engaged with an altitude select function still engaged as well? The autopilot's reaction was at odds with what normally have been done manually, namely level the nose and apply a lot of power to arrest the descent. The airplane basically stalled, they punched off the autopilot and added max power but it was too late.
Where are you hearing the aircraft stalled?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 07:50 AM
  #718  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,468
Default

Originally Posted by PeterGriffin View Post
The reason I even bring it up is it might explain how the pitch can get so out of whack with the autopilot still “engaged”. Especially if it was a transfer of controls back and forth and one not realizing the other had selected CWS. If the airplane was trimmed in such a way that the descent angle continues to increase and one crew member is trying to manipulate the MCP to no avail, it might explain the conversation “consistent with loss of control” that the NTSB said was on the CVR...again, I’m just trying to counter the “ill intent” view with possibile scenarios...whatever the case, once that aircraft hit 49 degrees nose down, I don’t know if it would even be possible to recover from at that altitude...and my guess, getting it back to 20 degrees nose down at the end was probably a pretty aggressive maneuver in and of itself at those speeds and descent rates...
You aren't a pilot, are you?

"other had selected CWS". That's not how CWS works.
dera is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 07:58 AM
  #719  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican View Post
Even if... The A/P on the 76 is not that strong folks, there is no way that it could fight two pilots and go to 49 degrees of pitch, there has to be something else here.
Agreed. No way are two experienced guys going to just let the AP pitch them over into the dirt.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-15-2019, 08:53 AM
  #720  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
You aren't a pilot, are you?

"other had selected CWS". That's not how CWS works.
Full disclosure, I have no working knowledge of the 767. On my aircraft there is a tile on the glareshield that will switch between CMD and CWS. If you select CWS it will remain in that mode until you select that tile again. It is really not used much, except on occasion when CMD mode is not maintaining airspeed very well, for example. I’m guessing you are very familiar with the 767, so I will assume your comment about 767 CWS is valid.
PeterGriffin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CallmeJB
Atlas/Polar
5
09-26-2017 07:27 PM
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
112
03-29-2013 01:36 AM
steamgauge
Cargo
95
03-24-2013 05:55 PM
tailwheel48
Cargo
5
11-04-2011 01:20 PM
EZRider
Cargo
2
03-09-2010 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices