Atlas MEC Statments
02-27-2019, 08:26 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 223
Atlas MEC Statments
Did Atlas MEC really say “Amazon Carriers are a ticking bomb”
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
02-27-2019, 08:45 AM
#3
Polyester Pilot
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 510
Originally Posted by PAOFlyer
I believe these comments were made before the IAH accident.
02-27-2019, 12:35 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: Wichita
Posts: 667
Originally Posted by midnightshuttle
Did Atlas MEC really say “Amazon Carriers are a ticking bomb”
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
02-27-2019, 01:12 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 207
Originally Posted by midnightshuttle
Did Atlas MEC really say “Amazon Carriers are a ticking bomb”
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
Just read that, news stories are referenced to it. Some Bloke is trying to say because low wages cant get good pilots. Id say that is encredible poor taste and lack of decency. Im at ATI, perhaps Im not an astronaut but Im safe and never failed anything. Just not fortunate to land a good interview. Those kind of statements are inappropriate
The experience level in many ACMI flight decks is minimal when compared to past times. That does not necessarily mean only high time pilots are good pilots, etc. Historically many carriers that have experienced high turn-over, rapid expansion, and quick upgrades also have increased operational issues. Most are not "accidents" (and I'm not directly implying this to Atlas 3591) and can be trended through ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, and internal airline reports. Those are just the reported occurrences, many stay within the flight deck walls and are never reported.
ATI for one has several quick upgrades with low time in type. So does Atlas and others. ABX is temporarily immune since any upgrades (which there are none..) would be from FO's with over 20yrs and thousands of hours in company type. They too will eventually hit the same benchmarks as others....not good from what I have seen on the line and in the jumpseat.
Of course, others will view this as a method to higher wages and/or rest rules. All of which are needed to play a single level of safety. His statements are far from inappropriate and more on the level of overdue and under-heard.
02-27-2019, 01:23 PM
#6
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Slightly tilted right and mostly asleep.
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by abxflyr
I had read the article and believe it was written and quoted long before the 23rd. With that said, it's my opinion that many of the operations within the ACMI world are higher risk than in past times.
The experience level in many ACMI flight decks is minimal when compared to past times. That does not necessarily mean only high time pilots are good pilots, etc. Historically many carriers that have experienced high turn-over, rapid expansion, and quick upgrades also have increased operational issues. Most are not "accidents" (and I'm not directly implying this to Atlas 3591) and can be trended through ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, and internal airline reports. Those are just the reported occurrences, many stay within the flight deck walls and are never reported.
ATI for one has several quick upgrades with low time in type. So does Atlas and others. ABX is temporarily immune since any upgrades (which there are none..) would be from FO's with over 20yrs and thousands of hours in company type. They too will eventually hit the same benchmarks as others....not good from what I have seen on the line and in the jumpseat.
Of course, others will view this as a method to higher wages and/or rest rules. All of which are needed to play a single level of safety. His statements are far from inappropriate and more on the level of overdue and under-heard.
The experience level in many ACMI flight decks is minimal when compared to past times. That does not necessarily mean only high time pilots are good pilots, etc. Historically many carriers that have experienced high turn-over, rapid expansion, and quick upgrades also have increased operational issues. Most are not "accidents" (and I'm not directly implying this to Atlas 3591) and can be trended through ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, and internal airline reports. Those are just the reported occurrences, many stay within the flight deck walls and are never reported.
ATI for one has several quick upgrades with low time in type. So does Atlas and others. ABX is temporarily immune since any upgrades (which there are none..) would be from FO's with over 20yrs and thousands of hours in company type. They too will eventually hit the same benchmarks as others....not good from what I have seen on the line and in the jumpseat.
Of course, others will view this as a method to higher wages and/or rest rules. All of which are needed to play a single level of safety. His statements are far from inappropriate and more on the level of overdue and under-heard.
03-04-2019, 01:52 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 223
Originally Posted by PAOFlyer
I believe these comments were made before the IAH accident.
Yes after further research your correct however the news sites were posting it as it had just happened as in post accident.
03-04-2019, 04:12 PM
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: sandwich
Posts: 96
Hard to believe some are stupid enough to think these statements came after the accident. Really? REALLY!?
The author corrected the title of his clickbait bs story.
https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/new...-232343-1.html
The author corrected the title of his clickbait bs story.
https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/new...-232343-1.html
03-05-2019, 09:14 AM
#9
Polyester Pilot
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 510
Originally Posted by Nate2046
Hard to believe some are stupid enough to think these statements came after the accident. Really? REALLY!?
The author corrected the title of his clickbait bs story.
https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/new...-232343-1.html
The author corrected the title of his clickbait bs story.
https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/new...-232343-1.html
03-05-2019, 06:09 PM
#10
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by sky jet
No, what is stupid is making these kinds of statements and then trying to walk them back when you have an accident. As I said above, in this day and age statements never go away. He clearly implied that an accident/incident was a possibility due to lowered hiring standards and or fatigue and morale. Now that one has happened those words are being used by the press to tarnish the reputations of the crew by insinuation. A statement from the union after the fact can not put the genie back in the bottle.
Hear, hear - hear, hear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
