Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
AAWW losing 2 AMZ planes >

AAWW losing 2 AMZ planes

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

AAWW losing 2 AMZ planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2019, 05:37 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by Tango Uniform View Post
UPS and FDX have contingency plans when volume spikes occur. How does Amazon handle this with their ACMI’s? It’s not like they have a flight in ABQ that can stop to pick up excess freight in ELP on the way to SDF. They don’t have the ability to sub an MD-11 for a 767 or a 74 for an MD. What about hot spares?
They just increased the flying at ABX 30% per airframe. Also extra flying that pops up all goes into open time. Between guys picking it up and being JRM it all gets covered. In 16 and 17 everyone complained but it all got covered. Guys seem to come to work when they are getting double and triple pay.
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 09-14-2019, 06:31 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 271
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
They just increased the flying at ABX 30% per airframe. Also extra flying that pops up all goes into open time. Between guys picking it up and being JRM it all gets covered. In 16 and 17 everyone complained but it all got covered. Guys seem to come to work when they are getting double and triple pay.
No wonder they dont have a new contract.
AAfng is offline  
Old 09-14-2019, 06:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Tango Uniform View Post
What about hot spares?
There are hot spares located in different parts of the country. Last time I looked, there were 3, I believe, but it may have changed.
wjcandee is offline  
Old 09-14-2019, 07:30 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by CardboardCutout View Post
I can't speak for ATI or ABX, but Omni seems to be hiring at a pretty good clip. Enough so that most of the guys in my class have not consolidated, presumably because they're getting bumped for even newer guys doing OE. I'm not speculating that we're getting freighters (seems unlikely, and I really hope not), but our contract, which, arguably, isn't THAT much better than ATI or ABX, seems to be able to attract candidates, even in the current hiring environment.
You don't want freighters? I'm curious as to why not. What makes pax flying so much better in your opinion? Genuinely curious
sandman22 is offline  
Old 09-14-2019, 10:08 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by sandman22 View Post
You don't want freighters? I'm curious as to why not. What makes pax flying so much better in your opinion? Genuinely curious
If I may interject, I do not believe his comment was meant to spark a debate over pax vs cargo flying.

Omni is a small but profitable company. We have a niche that (IMHO) we do very well. This differentiation sets us apart from other carriers including those under the ATSG umbrella.

Putting all your proverbial eggs into the Amazon basket carries its own unique set of risks. I think the general sentiment at Omni is "if it ain't broke...".

On a personal note, I enjoy the varied type of flying we do that includes more than just cargo hubs in the middle of the night. Also, our rest rules actually allow us to enjoy some of the benefits of this job.

Sorry to hijack your thread.
CFI Guy is offline  
Old 09-15-2019, 04:17 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 683
Default

Originally Posted by CFI Guy View Post
I think the general sentiment at Omni is "if it ain't broke..."

....our rest rules actually allow us to enjoy some of the benefits of this job.
Well said. The only thing I would add (which you alluded to) is that getting in to the freight game would also put us in to the whipsaw game.
CardboardCutout is offline  
Old 09-15-2019, 05:46 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Fetal and Fatigued
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by CardboardCutout View Post
Well said. The only thing I would add (which you alluded to) is that getting in to the freight game would also put us in to the whipsaw game.
It’s coming.
Jurassic Jet is offline  
Old 09-15-2019, 06:10 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by sandman22 View Post
You don't want freighters? I'm curious as to why not. What makes pax flying so much better in your opinion? Genuinely curious
It will not matter what Omni " wants" ...if Joe decides it will be to his advantage for whipsawing purposes...they will fly freight.
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 09-15-2019, 06:20 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
It will not matter what Omni " wants" ...if Joe decides it will be to his advantage for whipsawing purposes...they will fly freight.
No kidding. I wasn't interested in what Joe wants. I was asking an Omni pilot why he prefers pax over freight for my own curiosity.
sandman22 is offline  
Old 09-15-2019, 06:23 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 492
Default

ATSG promised investors that it was going to take a hands-off approach to Omni and its management, because it is generating a ton of cash with its passenger military and charter business and is very-well-run.

Omni used to also fly freight years ago, but whatever. They dumped it to focus on passengers, and have been successful with that business strategy.

Certainly it isn't lost on anyone that Omni is already certified to fly 777s, and has a pilot corps that is doing so, which means that if a substantial customer came along and wanted a bid for a significant amount of 777 freight flying, Omni management could (and probably should) at least consider doing so.

As to 767 cargo flying, I don't see it unless a huge opportunity came along that the other carriers wouldn't be able to handle in the necessary time frame, and maybe not even then.

Just as an aside, I think that it is very unfortunate that this nitwit Soaper has hamfistedly made statements to the ABX pilots that support the idea that a whipsaw is possible. It's an ineffective negotiating strategy and stupid to do. It is interesting that the other two ATSG carriers haven't played games like this and generally have good labor relations. The toxins that he produces over at ABX can ultimately ooze out and slime the perceptions of folks at the other carriers and make the jobs of management there more difficult, because employees see that the parent company is permitting this kind of conduct. It is puerile positional bargaining and, like at Atlas, that approach is never going to get the parties to an agreement. My 2 cents anyway.

Last edited by wjcandee; 09-15-2019 at 06:35 AM.
wjcandee is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20418
Today 01:32 PM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
RockBottom
Major
4
04-09-2006 04:23 PM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices