wjcandee |
06-03-2020 09:39 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by vnavpth
(Post 3069735)
Lol, Atlas, ABX, ATI, 21 Air, Dynamic. Take your pick. ATI isn’t going to be “giving” in to anything nerd. Not if my vote has anything to say about it. Remember guys article just says leasing will be done by ATSG nothing about who will operate them. Last time I checked neither Titan or CAM ran airlines.
|
Amazon leased 10 additional aircraft from CAM in 2019 and 2020, and placed all at ATI, plus 2 from Atlas plus one more from the new contract. Things went basically-smoothly, so they went back to ATSG for the next round of 12 leases. We say it over and over on here and nobody wants to hear it: it isn't about price, it's about reliability.
In fact, ABX's pilots ran the numbers and realized that their carrier is actually the cheaper one compared to ATI. Yet ATI will end 2020 flying 13 additional aircraft for Amazon over the prior two years. I don't know whether ATSG will try to place some of the next dozen with ABX or not. Maybe even they don't know. But I can tell you which carrier I would bet on getting at least half of the 2021 aircraft.
ATI has had a basically-good rapport with its pilots; Atlas and ABX haven't. ATI isn't running to the media every Peak complaining about how "tired" and dangerous and inexperienced and "an accident waiting to happen" its pilots are, and how Bobby might not get his fire truck for Christmas. ATI didn't SHOP or BOOT, intentionally-interfering with reliability. Amazon isn't going to be using 21 Air or Dynamic, likely ever, because unlike DHL, apparently, Amazon's overarching concern is reliability. If they have a contractor that's getting the job done, the contractor gets more business. If not, then not. Atlas couldn't staff the 767s, so two went to ATI, which could. Southern couldn't staff five 737s nor manage to operate them within more than a very-limited group of city-pairs while its pilots earned time, so 10 are going to Sun Country, which in a matter of days has already started running 737 flights to SJU. The "hold them hostage" tactics completely-failed, because management played hardball back and was willing to lose business to do so until the music stopped. Stupid of management, in my view, but there you are. In the meantime, the music did stop, as it always does -- from something -- in the airline business, and now the hardball-playing carriers have lots of potential pilots, but still terrible labor-relations. Would you give them more business? Why borrow the trouble?
|