Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

It is coming

Old 07-27-2020, 09:50 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
3pointlanding's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Default It is coming

They say it will not happen in the near future. It may not be tomorrow but the industry is changing and changing faster then I would have imagined. Read onhttps://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...er-experiment/
3pointlanding is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 09:52 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Default

Hackers wet dream!!!
C2078 is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 10:12 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 829
Default

Are they gonna build a robot to carry the briefcase full of cash to pay the “landing fees” in Burkina Faso?
goinaround is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 10:24 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default

https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/h...f-landing.html
TheFly is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 12:58 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 224
Default

Lawsuit reduction.

I know the Atlas pilot family is suing Atlas and Amazon and others for a whole host of claims.

If it's always going to be the mfg's fault, they might as well automate it, then they can at least control it. I think Boeing is likely to make a HUGE push into automation as well after the Max disaster (ie don't assume person in loop is a reliable safety factor especially on low time overseas pilots with poor local MX - yes, a bad design as well). Amazon has to be on board after Atlas and the claims against them from that crash.

Cargo would be a reasonable place to start this, though I would have expected somewhere overseas.

Going to take a while, but will happen. A few more Atlas pilots hiding their work histories, crashing, then suing their company and plane manufacturer and customers may help it move along more quickly.

Amazon is getting slammed for overworking and mistreating their ABX pilots as well. Automation has to be a wet dream for them.
dynap09 is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 02:19 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 829
Default

Originally Posted by dynap09 View Post
Lawsuit reduction.

I know the Atlas pilot family is suing Atlas and Amazon and others for a whole host of claims.

If it's always going to be the mfg's fault, they might as well automate it, then they can at least control it. I think Boeing is likely to make a HUGE push into automation as well after the Max disaster (ie don't assume person in loop is a reliable safety factor especially on low time overseas pilots with poor local MX - yes, a bad design as well). Amazon has to be on board after Atlas and the claims against them from that crash.

Cargo would be a reasonable place to start this, though I would have expected somewhere overseas.

Going to take a while, but will happen. A few more Atlas pilots hiding their work histories, crashing, then suing their company and plane manufacturer and customers may help it move along more quickly.

Amazon is getting slammed for overworking and mistreating their ABX pilots as well. Automation has to be a wet dream for them.
Just how is Amazon getting “slammed” exactly?
goinaround is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 04:07 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 642
Default

Half of the US population is afraid to walk outside their door without a mask on. People drive alone in their cars with masks and gloves on. I’m sure these same folks will be waiting on line to fly in a pilotless plane! Cargo may seem like a likely start until one week after ops commence and a plane gets lost, or crashes. Not worried.
Vito is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 04:24 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 396
Default

Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.
The Duke is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 05:02 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.

Yeah...because it’s an A350.....it would cost more to change the manufacturing process to no window cutouts. Just saying
boxthrower is offline  
Old 07-27-2020, 05:30 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.
That’s an interesting point. Labor is a bigger unit cost for pax carriers but it’s the freight haulers with the cash flow for the cap ex.
tallpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rudder
Cargo
16
01-29-2011 03:04 PM
Rightseat Ballast
Regional
13
01-16-2010 02:56 PM
Whacker77
Regional
20
08-05-2009 09:01 PM
Herbie
Regional
30
07-05-2009 08:56 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-09-2005 12:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices