Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   Almost got number three.... Darn! (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/130648-almost-got-number-three-darn.html)

captjns 08-07-2020 02:36 AM

Almost got number three.... Darn!
 
1 Attachment(s)
Incident: Atlas B744 at Shanghai on Aug 5th 2020, triple engine pod strike

WhaleWrangler 08-07-2020 03:36 AM

Those 10° crosswinds will get you everytime!!

Hitting the inboard pod takes some serious doing.

captjns 08-07-2020 04:02 AM


Originally Posted by WhaleWrangler (Post 3106193)
Those 10° crosswinds will get you everytime!!

Hitting the inboard pod takes some serious doing.

Back in the day, a pilot conducting a go-around in a 727-200 series, managed to nail the tail skid and a wingtip stinger light. Now that’s talent.

trip 08-07-2020 06:18 AM


Originally Posted by WhaleWrangler (Post 3106193)
Those 10° crosswinds will get you everytime!!

Hitting the inboard pod takes some serious doing.

Closer to 30 degree @ 40Kts right? Still what a mess.

Airbusgod 08-07-2020 11:30 AM

Keep on hiring those 2800tt regional jet guys . Great job

TiredSoul 08-07-2020 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by Airbusgod (Post 3106428)
Keep on hiring those 2800tt regional jet guys . Great job

Could have been you if you hadn’t no-showed the Jan class.

rickair7777 08-07-2020 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by trip (Post 3106261)
Closer to 30 degree @ 40Kts right? Still what a mess.

Yes, at peak. Wind is true, Rwy HDG is mag. Wind speed is in meters/sec. Somebody did the math in the comments.

rickair7777 08-07-2020 01:46 PM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3106470)
Could have been you if you hadn’t no-showed the Jan class.

Bad time to burn bridges in cargo. NEVER burn bridges.

AirborneUPSMovr 08-07-2020 02:59 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3106490)
Bad time to burn bridges in cargo. NEVER burn bridges.

True 2 weeks is better deal for sure

Airbusgod 08-08-2020 02:46 AM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3106470)
Could have been you if you hadn’t no-showed the Jan class.

Good point tired Tired soul only problem is I didn’t know about the Jan class till March. Know I understand how someone must feel when he is convicted of a crime he didn’t commit.

Globemaster2827 08-08-2020 05:17 AM

Wow... I'd assumed it was a massive crosswind but it looks like the winds were right down the runway with 10 knot gusts. I'm sure it was a somewhat tricky approach but that doesn't sound that cosmic... I wonder if someone completely chopped the power...

TiredSoul 08-08-2020 05:27 AM


Originally Posted by Globemaster2827 (Post 3106742)
Wow... I'd assumed it was a massive crosswind but it looks like the winds were right down the runway with 10 knot gusts. I'm sure it was a somewhat tricky approach but that doesn't sound that cosmic... I wonder if someone completely chopped the power...

More like 28G40......no doubt low level turbulence .

Incident: Atlas B744 at Shanghai on Aug 5th 2020, triple engine pod strike

Globemaster2827 08-08-2020 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3106749)
More like 28G40......no doubt low level turbulence .

Incident: Atlas B744 at Shanghai on Aug 5th 2020, triple engine pod strike

Oh yeah... Definitely a tricky approach but since they were mostly down the runway... I'll be interested to hear what happened on this one because I'm trying to wrap my brain around how you strike 3 pods. As has already been mentioned it's difficult to do that... They either bounced and wing rocked or I'm wondering if it's possible for the wings to flex on an insanely hard landing.

AboveMins 08-08-2020 06:24 AM

I've flown with the Captain involved in this incident a few times, and he seemed like a good stick. The winds in PVG do some strange things midfield where T3 & T4 bisect the field between terminals, especially when they're strong and gusty. Maybe that was a factor.

dba74 08-08-2020 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3106794)
I've flown with the Captain involved in this incident a few times, and he seemed like a good stick. The winds in PVG do some strange things midfield where T3 & T4 bisect the field between terminals, especially when they're strong and gusty. Maybe that was a factor.

did the F/O do the landing though?

AboveMins 08-08-2020 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by dba74 (Post 3106980)
did the F/O do the landing though?

No idea. I was digging through Hawk looking for a post flight report in the Messages, but didn't see one.

GIANT PILOT 08-08-2020 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by dba74 (Post 3106980)
did the F/O do the landing though?


My sources say it was the FO's landing

Elevation 08-08-2020 02:03 PM

Do we really want to evaluating this event here with snippets of second and third hand information? Are we really being fair to our own pilots? The data will come out with QAR data, and through the work of if the ERC. Once the real facts are established then we'll be able to say something intelligently.

These crewmembers are dealing with a lot today. Speculation is a natural part of these events, so I don't judge anyone for wondering what happened. Still, it's not helpful at this point. Perhaps it may be time to get some message out to dial back the speculation til the facts emerge? The union has done this in the past

captjns 08-08-2020 03:33 PM

Allow the ASAP and TAP ROOT processes run their course... Just saying.

worstpilotever 08-08-2020 06:45 PM

Underachiever. Real freight dogs get em all at once.

AboveMins 08-09-2020 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 3107036)
Do we really want to evaluating this event here with snippets of second and third hand information? Are we really being fair to our own pilots? The data will come out with QAR data, and through the work of if the ERC. Once the real facts are established then we'll be able to say something intelligently.

These crewmembers are dealing with a lot today. Speculation is a natural part of these events, so I don't judge anyone for wondering what happened. Still, it's not helpful at this point. Perhaps it may be time to get some message out to dial back the speculation til the facts emerge? The union has done this in the past

Good advice.

TiredSoul 08-09-2020 11:56 AM

Inboard pod with 2-3 degrees pitch down and 5-7 degrees bank?
I’d have to check the tables again but it’s not excessive.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....bfb7acbfb5.jpg

Grease 08-10-2020 05:55 AM

I have heard stories of Atlas chief pilots questioning crewmembers after go arounds. I always felt that this type of questioning could lead to pilots continuing unstable approaches when the best course of action is to go around and try again. Could they have been trying to save an unstable approach in gusty winds, just to avoid scrutiny from a chief pilot?

AboveMins 08-10-2020 06:00 AM


Originally Posted by Grease (Post 3107697)
I have heard stories of Atlas chief pilots questioning crewmembers after go arounds. I always felt that this type of questioning could lead to pilots continuing unstable approaches when the best course of action is to go around and try again. Could they have been trying to save an unstable approach in gusty winds, just to avoid scrutiny from a chief pilot?

I'm by no means a "company man", but have never been questioned about a go-around, or ever heard about anyone being questioned for a go-around here. It's quite the opposite, actually. They're adamant about being stable at the 1000' gate, and hammer it hard during training.

Grease 08-10-2020 06:07 AM


Originally Posted by AboveMins (Post 3107699)
I'm by no means a "company man", but have never been questioned about a go-around, or ever heard about anyone being questioned for a go-around here. It's quite the opposite, actually. They're adamant about being stable at the 1000' gate, and hammer it hard during training.

The story I heard might be an isolated incident and purely anecdotal, I should say. But if it happened once, is it plausible that it only happened once? But it’s refreshing to hear that you personally haven’t had that experience.

742Dash 08-10-2020 06:31 AM


Originally Posted by Grease (Post 3107697)
I have heard stories of Atlas chief pilots questioning crewmembers after go arounds. I always felt that this type of questioning could lead to pilots continuing unstable approaches when the best course of action is to go around and try again. Could they have been trying to save an unstable approach in gusty winds, just to avoid scrutiny from a chief pilot?

22 years at Atlas, both fleets, and I have never heard of such a thing.

rickair7777 08-10-2020 06:50 AM


Originally Posted by Airbusgod (Post 3106718)
Good point tired Tired soul only problem is I didn’t know about the Jan class till March. Know I understand how someone must feel when he is convicted of a crime he didn’t commit.

I understand your pain. But I'll point out that others can learn from the lesson...

Employers (all sectors) are very oriented to hiring through the digital sphere. If job hunting you must carefully manage every single aspect of your digital presence, including social media, email, etc to present the good impression that you want to make. No sympathy from the HR ladies, most of who are millenials now anyway and consider digital faux paus to be a sign of boomers who they actively want to avoid.

For email, use a professional appearing email with a reputable domain: ex: [email protected]. Not [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], etc. Don't use disposable email domains.

Make sure you can recover it if you get locked out, check your spam daily (it usually auto-deletes after 30 days). Use an email you custom-made for professional purposes. Don't use an organizational email, you'll lose it when you leave and don't have control of spam filters. Make sure you email is not associated on the webs with anything that will be perceived as bad or controversial (including politics). You can rarely undo those kind of associations, so if in doubt delete an old email and create a new one. If you've had an email for a long time, try googling it to see what it's associated with (you might be unpleasantly surprised).

Elevation 08-10-2020 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by Grease (Post 3107697)
I have heard stories of Atlas chief pilots questioning crewmembers after go arounds. I always felt that this type of questioning could lead to pilots continuing unstable approaches when the best course of action is to go around and try again. Could they have been trying to save an unstable approach in gusty winds, just to avoid scrutiny from a chief pilot?

I havent heard of this. We have a no-fault go-around policy here like most airlines. Our verbiage of that policy requests but does not require reports after a go around. (We can discuss the merits and lack thereof of this requested report at some length.)

Perhaps your friend was getting a response on the report he filed rather than a "Why did you miss?" call?

Grease 08-10-2020 10:13 AM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 3107745)
I havent heard of this. We have a no-fault go-around policy here like most airlines. Our verbiage of that policy requests but does not require reports after a go around. (We can discuss the merits and lack thereof of this requested report at some length.)

Perhaps your friend was getting a response on the report he filed rather than a "Why did you miss?" call?

Perhaps. This could entirely be the case.

You all obviously have much more insight into the flying culture at Atlas than I do, so I’ll defer to your opinions based on your first hand knowledge, and not my 3rd hand hearsay!

Elevation 08-10-2020 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Grease (Post 3107890)
Perhaps. This could entirely be the case.

You all obviously have much more insight into the flying culture at Atlas than I do, so I’ll defer to your opinions based on your first hand knowledge, and not my 3rd hand hearsay!

I work here and I don't have much more insight. Actually i was speculating out loud, which is something I said was bad to do just a few posts back. I'm being hypocrite and a blow-hard again.

Regardless I hope your friend is doing well.

AboveMins 08-10-2020 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 3107935)
I work here and I don't have much more insight. Actually i was speculating out loud, which is something I said was bad to do just a few posts back. I'm being hypocrite and a blow-hard again.

Regardless I hope your friend is doing well.

Don't worry, Elevation. We're all pilots here, so being a blow-hard hypocrite just sort of naturally happens. Pull up a chair, grab a drink, and light up a cigar... :D

ScrappyCocoa 08-10-2020 05:52 PM

Just think, only another year or two before some of those *fully vetted* 2017-2019 hires find the left seat. Hold onto your butts.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:11 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands