Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Fdx Mec Rep Recall

Old 06-18-2007, 10:50 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default Fdx Mec Rep Recall

I’ve been reading the posts about pilots dissatisfaction with the way the MEC and DW is/has handled the Age 60 Issue as well as other issues at FDX. However, I don’t see or hear much about what’s being done to change the MEC representatives. I understand that the issue of recall of representatives has been requested for LEC 26’s next meeting. Any other LEC initiating the same action?? In my opinion, I’ve seen enough “spin” and “damage control” from this MEC and it’s officers. It’s time for them to go.
Micro is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 11:07 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 CA
Posts: 150
Default

Micro,

The Age 60 ruling is going to change! Period! Whether we like it or not. A pilot on the seniority list deserves to be able to bid and hold whatever his or her seniority allows. Questions? None! Let's put that issue away.

We have a bigger issue coming up. A potential LOA covering two new foreign domiciles. This is going to have a big impact on FedEx's crew force. Many of you have no interest in bidding either domicile. I understand that. But, everyone needs to understand the issues and not allow a substandard LOA to be shoved down our throat.

If our leadership rolls over on this one, then I am one that will be advocating regime change.
prezbear is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 11:34 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default

Prezbear, The age 60 ruling is NOT the issue. The issue is substandard representation and leadership by our MEC and Officers on a number of issues that age 60 was only a part of. I don't trust them anymore on any issue. How many times do you have to be "slapped" before you say ENOUGH (if they rollover on your next issue (potential LOA on foreign domiciles)???). My question was (and is): If the FDX pilots are angry and no longer trust this MEC and the officers, what's being done to change them.
Micro is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 12:16 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 CA
Posts: 150
Default

Your right! I agree, Age 60 is not the issue. The issue here is representation. And I am sick of hearing, "You're only 80 guys! In reference to the Subic domicile.
prezbear is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 01:54 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Prez,

Before you get into a big discussion with him looks like he just signed up and has 2 posts. Smells a bit fishy....


Past...
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 03:56 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by prezbear View Post
Your right! I agree, Age 60 is not the issue. The issue here is representation. And I am sick of hearing, "You're only 80 guys! In reference to the Subic domicile.
Yes, you're only 80 guys, but with very BIG smiles on your faces.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:18 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 CA
Posts: 150
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Yes, you're only 80 guys, but with very BIG smiles on your faces.
Jet,

Do you have any idea how expensive two smiley faces are in Hong Kong?? Ok, well I don't either, but they can't be cheap. Di ba?
prezbear is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 06:09 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CA 767
Posts: 402
Default

Yogi Bear- I think everyone wanting th age 60 rule to change is trying to put out the perception that its a done deal. Hoping people will just accept it and be quiet.

This rule is not a Slam dunk! Have you ever heard of the NPRM? Even Blakley said we will listen to everyone during the NPRM. And if the Silent Majority gets Vocal, this rule will die. Especially when the AMR, APA, NWA and the 70% of all other 121 pilots say go pack sand ICAO.

I can see why all you old farts are trying to spin it this way, hoping everyone has Apathy.
Nashmd11 is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 07:02 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by 130JDrvr View Post
Prez,

Before you get into a big discussion with him looks like he just signed up and has 2 posts. Smells a bit fishy....


Past...

130JDrvr, I didn't "know" that subjects couldn't be discussed just because someone just joined the forum. But to rid the fishy smell...the site would not accept ANY new registrations for about a weeks time around the beginning of the month. And what, nobody wanted to answer you when you only had two posts. So how about your view on the subject??

The Alpa constitution makes it very hard to get rid of representatives and even harder to get rid of an officer (DW, WH, CB). But the start is getting the request for recall ballots on your LEC's agenda through your LEC Chairman in writing. Then we get to decide if their out or not. Hopefully all the "anger" I see on this forum gets directed to remove these representatives and officers.
Micro is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 07:12 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 825
Default

Originally Posted by Nashmd11 View Post
Yogi Bear- I think everyone wanting th age 60 rule to change is trying to put out the perception that its a done deal. Hoping people will just accept it and be quiet.

This rule is not a Slam dunk! Have you ever heard of the NPRM? Even Blakley said we will listen to everyone during the NPRM. And if the Silent Majority gets Vocal, this rule will die. Especially when the AMR, APA, NWA and the 70% of all other 121 pilots say go pack sand ICAO.

I can see why all you old farts are trying to spin it this way, hoping everyone has Apathy.
Nasher is right... check www.govtrack.us S.65 and HR.1125 are far from a "done deal"


Legislation > 110th U.S. Congress (2007-2008)
S. 65: A bill to modify the age-60 standard for certain pilots and for other purposes

Bill Status




Jan 4, 2007Introduced- not Scheduled for Debate- not Voted on in Senate- not Voted on in House- not Signed by President

This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills go first to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revised bills before they go to general debate. The majority of bills never make it out of committee.

Bill Overview

Sponsor:Sen. James Inhofe [R-OK]show cosponsors (25)
Cosponsors
Sen. Wayne Allard [R-CO]
Sen. Robert Bennett [R-UT]
Sen. Christopher Bond [R-MO]
Sen. Samuel Brownback [R-KS]
Sen. Jim Bunning [R-KY]
Sen. Thad Cochran [R-MS]
Sen. John Cornyn [R-TX]
Sen. Larry Craig [R-ID]
Sen. Michael Crapo [R-ID]
Sen. John Ensign [R-NV]
Sen. Michael Enzi [R-WY]
Sen. Russell Feingold [D-WI]
Sen. Charles Grassley [R-IA]
Sen. Orrin Hatch [R-UT]
Sen. Kay Hutchison [R-TX]
Sen. John Isakson [R-GA]
Sen. Jon Kyl [R-AZ]
Sen. Joseph Lieberman [I-CT]
Sen. John McCain [R-AZ]
Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R-AK]
Sen. Bill Nelson [D-FL]
Sen. Ken Salazar [D-CO]
Sen. Ted Stevens [R-AK]
Sen. Craig Thomas [R-WY]
Sen. David Vitter [R-LA]
Cosponsorship information sometimes is out of date.

Last Action:Jan 4, 2007: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.Full Text:View Full Text of Bill
NoHaz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WatchThis!
Major
4
06-15-2007 07:03 PM
Bitme
Cargo
54
05-25-2007 09:17 PM
FreightDawgyDog
Cargo
32
05-13-2007 09:50 AM
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
5
05-01-2007 05:27 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
3
08-30-2006 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices