Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Now playing....the Vice Chairmans Message >

Now playing....the Vice Chairmans Message

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Now playing....the Vice Chairmans Message

Old 08-07-2007, 11:41 AM
  #1  
"blue collar thug"!
Thread Starter
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default Now playing....the Vice Chairmans Message

it did not cost us anything to get, and it addresses the needs of pilots who will be based in CDG and HKG.

Really now?


but also on providing strengthened contractual coverage for this international flying and a stronger foundation from which to negotiate future FDA benefits. The big picture here is literally the “scope” of FedEx’s global flying.

Really, really now?

And, when will these claims be substantiated?

BTW, when is EI's update going to come out. Seems like an unfair playing field.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 11:42 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Let the ALPA MESSAGE shower begin. Low miles, one owner, kick the tires and driv'er home.........
hamfisted is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 11:47 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 122
Default

Broadcasting Live from Covington Pike, Its the LOA sale sponsored by, ALPA MEC, BC, and JL.
Lipout1 is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:26 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

The fundamental message I take from DM's message is to vote. Change your mind if you want to, but Vote. And, this is why I voted the way I did.

Try not to put any spin on it, just read it and take it for what it's worth.

In my opinion, he uses the "scope" phrase to try and indicate that this LOA doesn't provide any contractual scope protection, but, rather as a word that we all understand means FedEx pilots doing FedEx flying.

Whether that precedent is worth the STV precedent is.......debatable.

I don't think it is.

As to money, I don't think we got enough, but, I also don't see where this is costing the whole list of seniority folks any $$$$. If it passes, certainly could cost me some time if the STV process goes the way I think it will.
The main thing this LOA does is deprive me of the opportunity to bid for the FDAs-specifically CDG. Even upgrading to NB Capt will not put additional $$ in my pocket, additional $$ for me to save for retirement or college (other than the extra $$ into the B plan)

I don't see any condescending, I know better than you message from DM.

So, Vote
kronan is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:37 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Kronan,

Not to nit pick but when he implies Fedex Pilot doing Fedex Flying he is putting spin out that voting no could mean chinese pilots doing fedex flying (wait we already have that). Spin is spin.

This LOA does nothing for scope and to imply it does is spinning.

But vote, especially if you have taken the time to read the LOA.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:49 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 32
Default Who's left?

We still have yet to hear from the Sec/Treas, the front desk ladies and the night janitor. Once we get their ringing endorsements of this LOA, I think they'll be done with the email campaign.

Pretty sad when I have to start using my spam filter on message lines.

In case you forgot, you can change your vote....
WhoopWhoop is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:17 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 909
Default

Yep, as the end nears, the more "vote yes" messages....they really must be behind in the count!!

I say 76/24 against..anybody else?
magic rat is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:23 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigWatchPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Bench Warmer
Posts: 241
Default

58/42 Going down...
BigWatchPilot is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:30 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boom Boom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: FDX Airbus F/O
Posts: 152
Default

I think it is gonna be tight... Talk to a few that have changed... Close!

52/48 AGAINST
Boom Boom is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:54 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Block 5 update on FDXMEC Page. If we ignore STV maybe they will forget about it.

I'll be 55-45 no. Considering the Yes votes start with a big advantage anything over 50 send a strong message.
FDXLAG is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices