Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FAA Reauth. Bill and RLA status >

FAA Reauth. Bill and RLA status

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FAA Reauth. Bill and RLA status

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2007, 03:28 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

According to CNBC, President Bush will veto the bill if it's price tag is more than the budget amount of approx. 92-98 billion, currently it is at 104-114 billion.
HDawg is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:37 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by kwri10s View Post
.... I guess they really don't want another union on the property.
...or in France...or in Hong Kong...and that's why it was a bluff saying they could/would outsource the FDA jobs to foreign pilots.

They don't like organized labor groups, but given the fact we are already unionized it's to their benefit to only deal with one group.

Oops, sorry --- I'm going to be in trouble for bringing up the LOA!
DLax85 is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:19 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dadof6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Trunk Monkey
Posts: 562
Default Not quite

Originally Posted by Huck View Post
The truckers at Fedex are viewed as airline employees. The truckers at UPS are not.
I know it's foolish, but I actually read the hardcopy shareholder report FedEx sent out a month or so ago in preparation for yesterday's meeting. Believe it referred to truckers as "owners/operators" and "independent contractors" versus FedEx employees. That's the crux of the class action lawsuit pending. FWIW.
Dadof6 is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:36 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
machz990's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 494
Default

Originally Posted by Dadof6 View Post
I know it's foolish, but I actually read the hardcopy shareholder report FedEx sent out a month or so ago in preparation for yesterday's meeting. Believe it referred to truckers as "owners/operators" and "independent contractors" versus FedEx employees. That's the crux of the class action lawsuit pending. FWIW.
I believe that is just for the RPS drivers who came over as FedEx Ground drivers. Basically repainted their RPS trucks but maintained their independant status. However the RPS drivers are fighting FedEx claiming that they are independant contractors but are being treated as employees without the benefits.
machz990 is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:56 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bohica's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Two words:

Memorial Day
Bohica is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 04:29 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Delco92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 68
Default

I took this from the other Cargo section:

H.R.2881
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2007 (Reported in House)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Subtitle B--Unmanned Aircraft Systems

SEC. 321. COMMERCIAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PLAN.

(a) Integration Plan-

(1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN- Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with representatives of the aviation industry, shall develop a comprehensive plan to safely integrate commercial unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.

(2) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS- In developing the plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, at a minimum--

(A) review technologies and research that will assist in facilitating the safe integration of commercial unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system;

(B) provide recommendations for the rulemaking to be conducted under subsection (b) to--

(i) define the acceptable standards for operations and certification of commercial unmanned aircraft systems;

(ii) ensure that any commercial unmanned aircraft system includes a detect, sense, and avoid capability; and

(iii) develop standards and requirements for the operator or programmer of a commercial unmanned aircraft system, including standards and requirements for registration and licensing;

(C) recommend how best to enhance the technologies and subsystems necessary to effect the safe and routine operations of commercial unmanned aircraft systems in the national airspace system; and

(D) recommend how a phased-in approach to the integration of commercial unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system can best be achieved and a timeline upon which such a phase-in shall occur.

(3) DEADLINE- The plan to be developed under paragraph (1) shall provide for the safe integration of commercial unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system as soon as possible, but not later than September 30, 2012.

(4) REPORT TO CONGRESS- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a copy of the plan developed under paragraph (1).

(b) Rulemaking- Not later than 18 months after the date on which the integration plan is submitted to Congress under subsection (a)(4), the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to implement the recommendations of the integration plan.

(c) Authorization- There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

SEC. 322. SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

(a) In General- Notwithstanding the requirements of sections 321 and 323, and not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 321 or the guidance required by section 323.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems- In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and population areas, and operation within visual line-of-sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of authorization or an airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

SEC. 323. PUBLIC UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance regarding the operation of public unmanned aircraft systems to--

(1) expedite the issuance of a certificate of authorization process;

(2) provide for a collaborative process with public agencies to allow for an incremental expansion of access to the national airspace system as technology matures and the necessary safety analysis and data become available and until standards are completed and technology issues are resolved; and

(3) facilitate the capability of public agencies to develop and use test ranges, subject to operating restrictions required by the Federal Aviation Administration, to test and operate unmanned aircraft systems.

`detect, sense, and avoid capability' means the technical capability to perform separation assurance and collision avoidance, as defined by the Federal Aviation Administration.

(3) PUBLIC UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM- The term `public unmanned aircraft system' means an unmanned aircraft system that meets the qualifications and conditions required for operation of a public aircraft, as defined by section 40102 of title 49, United States Code.

(4) SECRETARY- The term `Secretary' means the Secretary of Transportation.

(5) TEST RANGE- The term `test range' means a defined geographic area where research and development are conducted.

(6) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT- The term `unmanned aircraft' means an aircraft that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft.

(7) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM- The term `unmanned aircraft system' means an unmanned aircraft and associated elements (such as communication links and a ground control station) that are required to operate safely and efficiently in the national airspace system.

I have already spoken two both my Senators and my Rep about this. I hope everyone else does NOT rely on ALPA to protect your job.
Delco92 is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 10:43 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Piloto Noche's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
Default

I guess I'd better start working on my high five today.
Piloto Noche is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:26 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Freightbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A300 Capt
Posts: 156
Default Why wait past age 60

Is this correct?
1 Re-authorization bill is stalled with threat of a Presidential veto
2 No chance of changing the rule prior within 6 weeks
3 FedEx standing bid closes Nov 19th
4 The next bid may not be until summer 2008

So if I am in the back seat waiting for the rule to change, I will have to plumb for minimum of 12 more months just for the hope to re-qual as Captain. Then after the senior f/e’s check out.

Please poke holes
-
Freightbird is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 11:09 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,336
Cool That's the way I see it.

Originally Posted by Freightbird View Post
Is this correct?
1 Re-authorization bill is stalled with threat of a Presidential veto
2 No chance of changing the rule prior within 6 weeks
3 FedEx standing bid closes Nov 19th
4 The next bid may not be until summer 2008

So if I am in the back seat waiting for the rule to change, I will have to plumb for minimum of 12 more months just for the hope to re-qual as Captain. Then after the senior f/e’s check out.

Please poke holes
-
That just about sums it up. Spread the word to your "almost 60" friends.

If I were turning 60, I'd just take my bag of marbles off the table and think about another way to sell my free time and retire rather than plumbing on the boeing.....or maybe I'd just enjoy the retirement.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 11:21 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Easy there...

Get antagonistic and some will hang around just for spite. The correct phraseology is "man..thanks for all your help building this company, and I hope you enjoy you next adventures..."

Remember--it ain't personal...
Albief15 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices