Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-24-2007, 09:39 AM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
KnightFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,415
Exclamation FAA Reauth. Bill and RLA status

Didn't know the RLA status was in play again with the FAA bill. How would it affect us if it changes?

From last week's FDX conference call:

Quote:
We anticipate that the House will probably bring the FAA reauthorization bill to the floor this week either today or tomorrow. It is still in the Committee process on the Senate side and we would not expect it to move forward there probably until sometime in October if it does move forward on that side. The House bill does include language that would change and modify the RLA status of FedEx Express. The Senate bill, as we anticipated, will not. We are confident and ultimately, we will be able to have folks listen to the policy, arguments and the important impact that Railway Labor Act status can have on major national transportation networks in maintaining access for all customers to a continued service without being hostage to various kinds of labor disruptions. We feel very confident of our position on this and feel confident that we'll be able to see the bill move forward without any labor provisions that are troubling to us.
KnightFlyer is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:48 AM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 388
Default

It's kind of ironic that the company is spending their political clout to fight against the Bill that has the over 60 ruling attached to it and our union is fighting for the Bill. It's nice that the company is siding with the majority of the FDX pilots who oppose the over 60 addendum instead of the union on this issue. Of course they might be against the bill for an entirely different reason. I guess they really don't want another union on the property.
kwri10s is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:07 AM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
KnightFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwri10s View Post
I guess they really don't want another union on the property.
Agree; and they think we're a pain in the pants!
KnightFlyer is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:29 AM   #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 707
Default

Article in the WSJ the other day said that the changes to the RLA would have huge negative effects for Fedex (only 1 union) but not for UPS (all union) and has something to do with allowing truckers to organize.
Tuck is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:47 AM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClutchCargo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: FDX MD11 Capt in ANC
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
Article in the WSJ the other day said that the changes to the RLA would have huge negative effects for Fedex (only 1 union) but not for UPS (all union) and has something to do with allowing truckers to organize.
The RLA change was added due to lobbying by UPS and the Teamsters.
ClutchCargo is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:30 AM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,088
Default

The truckers at Fedex are viewed as airline employees. The truckers at UPS are not.
Huck is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:48 AM   #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huck View Post
The truckers at Fedex are viewed as airline employees. The truckers at UPS are not.
So, if the truckers are viewed as airline employees...Could they get through the TSA gauntlet with just their ID, and no boarding pass?
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:56 AM   #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeeDub's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Finally Facing Forward
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
So, if the truckers are viewed as airline employees...Could they get through the TSA gauntlet with just their ID, and no boarding pass?
Depending on the airport, TSA person and time of day FedEx pilots can't even do that.
SeeDub is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 12:32 PM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

That was my point.
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:14 AM   #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Piloto Noche's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 192
Default RLA, UPS and FedEx

As I understand it, FedEx has enjoyed quite an advantage over UPS in that they operate under the RLA and UPS (not an "airline") does not. The essence of this is that under the RLA, employees must organize on a national level. In other words, mechanics in Detroit or Tulsa can't organize on their own. All mechanics, nationwide, must organize at the same time; much more difficult than if you are all based in the same city like pilots are. So, the employee groups at UPS were each able to organize individually across the nation. It's much more difficult to get all of the separate employee groups from all of the cities around the US moving in the same direction. So that is why FedEx is against this. I would assume UPS would be all for it. I've also heard it rumored that if this bill gets to the Prez with this provision, he's likely to veto it. After all, he and Fred were buddies in the Skull and Bones club and all.
Piloto Noche is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 AM.