Posting 07-03
10-05-2007, 06:47 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD10 FO
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
Still as firm as it gets at FDX for Aircraft deliveries, but since the 1st is, as mentioned above, due in Jul 09, it obviously doesn't show in the May 09 (end of Fiscal year) total. Based on the latest schedule, we should have 3 by peak of 09 and the listed 5 by May10.
10-06-2007, 12:00 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by vagabond
I just want to know what in the world is meant by "practice bid!" Why do you have to practice bidding? Don't you know how to do it by now? 
It's like swimming or riding a bike or sex.
It's like swimming or riding a bike or sex.
10-06-2007, 12:03 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by Busboy
I
But, they would have opened the FDAs anyway. Right?
But, they would have opened the FDAs anyway. Right?
Yes Contractually thte company had the ability. They could have posted this very same Bid with the requirement to sign an FDA agreement without any of the substandard housing allowance.
10-06-2007, 07:12 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
...They could have posted this very same Bid with the requirement to sign an FDA agreement ...
What part of our contract would require that?
Last edited by Busboy; 10-06-2007 at 08:06 AM.
10-06-2007, 07:21 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Yes Contractually thte company had the ability. They could have posted this very same Bid with the requirement to sign an FDA agreement without any of the substandard housing allowance.
10-06-2007, 09:31 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Yes Contractually thte company had the ability. They could have posted this very same Bid with the requirement to sign an FDA agreement without any of the substandard housing allowance.
10-06-2007, 10:34 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 1 on big twin
Posts: 324
Bump
Originally Posted by Jumbo Pilot
From what I have seen so far in this process, there has not been a great deal of excitement in the crew force about filling the 757 FO slots at CDG.
Let's say for the sake of argument, that less than half of the CDG 757 FO slots are filled by pilots currently on the property as a result of this most recent bid. Does the company open up another vacancy bid (07-04?) to plus up the numbers for 757 FO MEM to deepen the pool for STV or do they opt for new hires?
Thoughts?
Let's say for the sake of argument, that less than half of the CDG 757 FO slots are filled by pilots currently on the property as a result of this most recent bid. Does the company open up another vacancy bid (07-04?) to plus up the numbers for 757 FO MEM to deepen the pool for STV or do they opt for new hires?
Thoughts?
10-06-2007, 10:38 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Boy did I underestimate the amount of money tax equalization is saving Fred.
Last edited by Gunter; 10-06-2007 at 10:44 AM.
10-06-2007, 10:43 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Originally Posted by Jumbo Pilot
Let's say for the sake of argument, that less than half of the CDG 757 FO slots are filled by pilots currently on the property as a result of this most recent bid.
Does the company open up another vacancy bid (07-04?) to plus up the numbers for 757 FO MEM to deepen the pool for STV or do they opt for new hires?
Thoughts?
Could there be a displacement bid for 727 SO's? Where would they go?
I wonder if 727 FO's could face a small displacement bid....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
