SIG Disputed Pairings
10-09-2007, 06:41 AM
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B-757 Captain
Posts: 38
SIG Disputed Pairings
Can anyone help me out and list the MD-11 disputed pairings for this month? I'm having a hard time getting on the union website. or let me know how to look them up elsewhere... thanks..
I've been home on vacation with our 5th child and need to fly before a sim at the end of the month...
I've been home on vacation with our 5th child and need to fly before a sim at the end of the month...
10-09-2007, 07:12 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
MD-11 ANC
Pairing #134 is a one-time only pairing which is being disputed for an initial all-night flight to NRT followed by a continuous rolling body clock and multiple circadian shifts and a very short layover in ALA. This flight operates once on Oct. 10.
MD-11 LAX
None
MD-11 MEM
#314 – This pairing is a 3-leg out-and-back that is scheduled to arrive at 0959 LBT, one minute before the 1000 LBT contractual limit. We believe this is unrealistic due to departure delays in IAH and arrival delays into DFW.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/FDX/Deskto...cumentID=40014
Pairing #134 is a one-time only pairing which is being disputed for an initial all-night flight to NRT followed by a continuous rolling body clock and multiple circadian shifts and a very short layover in ALA. This flight operates once on Oct. 10.
MD-11 LAX
None
MD-11 MEM
#314 – This pairing is a 3-leg out-and-back that is scheduled to arrive at 0959 LBT, one minute before the 1000 LBT contractual limit. We believe this is unrealistic due to departure delays in IAH and arrival delays into DFW.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/FDX/Deskto...cumentID=40014
10-09-2007, 12:04 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,336
Register
If you register on the ALPA website and give them an email address, they will gift wrap the disputed pairings very nicely in emails to your email address a couple of times a month in the form of the sig letter, then they are the bottom of every message line. Thanks for coming here to get the info. Now it is time to take the next step and sign up on the ALPA website. If you need help....PM me and I will happy to help you through the process.
Regards,
Regards,
10-09-2007, 07:08 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Originally Posted by Gunter
MD-11 MEM
#314 – This pairing is a 3-leg out-and-back that is scheduled to arrive at 0959 LBT, one minute before the 1000 LBT contractual limit. We believe this is unrealistic due to departure delays in IAH and arrival delays into DFW.
No wonder the SIG can't get rid of fatiguing and onerous trips like this!*?
10-09-2007, 08:35 PM
#5
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 122
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
I WAS surprised to see that at least 9 days of these trips are being flown by only 2 Capt's (Apparently for straight time? One of the a former manager!).
No wonder the SIG can't get rid of fatiguing and onerous trips like this!*?
No wonder the SIG can't get rid of fatiguing and onerous trips like this!*?
10-09-2007, 09:23 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: headbanging
Posts: 954
[quote=Gunter;244561]MD-11 ANC
Pairing #134 is a one-time only pairing which is being disputed for an initial all-night flight to NRT followed by a continuous rolling body clock and multiple circadian shifts and a very short layover in ALA. This flight operates once on Oct. 10.
Congrats to ANC crews. This pairing did operate, but with BOTH crewmembers on reserve. All voluntary DP flyers take note, you suck balls.
Pairing #134 is a one-time only pairing which is being disputed for an initial all-night flight to NRT followed by a continuous rolling body clock and multiple circadian shifts and a very short layover in ALA. This flight operates once on Oct. 10.
Congrats to ANC crews. This pairing did operate, but with BOTH crewmembers on reserve. All voluntary DP flyers take note, you suck balls.
10-10-2007, 03:57 AM
#8
...Whatever It Is!
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Originally Posted by PurpleTail
For the most part ANC and LAX pilots get it...and then there is MEM (need I say more 
)
)
Larger base = more selfish SOBs. If those bases were larger, I bet that they might not seem so differently than MEM.
10-10-2007, 07:02 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog
But there are MORE guys in MEM that DON'T fly DPs than in LAX and ANC combined! Larger base = more selfish SOBs. If those bases were larger, I bet that they might not seem so differently than MEM.
Larger base = more selfish SOBs. If those bases were larger, I bet that they might not seem so differently than MEM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
