Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
New-Build A320F...things that make you go "Hmmm" >

New-Build A320F...things that make you go "Hmmm"

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

New-Build A320F...things that make you go "Hmmm"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2007, 03:31 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Runner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Mayor of Awesometown
Posts: 137
Default New-Build A320F...things that make you go "Hmmm"

TNT is in talks with Airbus regarding the prospects of a new-build A320 freighter. With the small pool of 757's FedEx will have to draw from, and the retirement of UPS's 72's and eventually the DC-8's, it makes one wonder if Brown and Purple will jump in the mix on any A320F development.

Runner is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilot7576's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 679
Default 320f

Runner...

I would never say never, but in the new capts course a few years ago, ups planners said the nb days are over. The only hulls they are interested in are widebodies. Even the 757 is too small for future acquisition. They said they were interested in 767/300 hulls on the used market...of course that was before the new buy of 767's was announced.

YMMV

Pilot7576
Pilot7576 is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:04 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ Jay's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Default

I have to agree with the end of the Narrow body days. All of the articles about cargo fleet growth have mentioned that while the number of airframes total will increase over the next 15-25 years, the real change is in the WB/NB mix. If you want to grow package volume from Los Angeles to SDF (for example), you have limited amount of time for the aircraft to leave L.A. late enough to get the 5pm overnight drop offs in the area, and still get to SDF for the sort and make the early departures to the east coast to be delivered by the early am. As a result, long term, in order to accommodate projected volume growth while also maintaining schedule/delivery integrity, and guaranteeing low percentage of service failures, most trunk cargo aircraft will increase in gauge, not frequency (fewer flights equals more efficient use of airspace, ramp space, crews, etc). These gauge increases will then filter down the supply/delivery chain. For example, the 744 replaces the MD11 on ANC to HKG, that MD11 replaces the 767 on LA to SDF, that 767 replaces the A300 on the DEN to SDF, the DC8 replaces the 727 on the TLH SDF etc etc. I can't honestly believe that another NB freighter would sell well over the long term. I could see conversion work for exiting airframes to replace some portions of the fleet, but not huge orders.

Just my two cents.
ERJ Jay is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:29 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Runner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Mayor of Awesometown
Posts: 137
Default

Good points and I agree that this thing has a 99% chance of never darkening a Brown ramp, given UPS's recent Boeing acquisitions. I do, however see the A320 as a huge possibility for FDX, especially when you consider how hard to come-by 75's are going to be for the foreseeable future. Another theory to consider...has anyone thought about the possibility of FDX hitting the 757 acquisition wall and begin acquiring it's common-type sister that's still in production?
Runner is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:31 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Runner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Mayor of Awesometown
Posts: 137
Default

And yes, I know there's a bean-counter in MEM that has a far better grasp on the 757 market than I do. Lord knows, they probably have checks pre-written for all tail numbers still with pax seats in them.
Runner is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 08:48 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rocco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ Jay View Post
I have to agree with the end of the Narrow body days. All of the articles about cargo fleet growth have mentioned that while the number of airframes total will increase over the next 15-25 years, the real change is in the WB/NB mix. If you want to grow package volume from Los Angeles to SDF (for example), you have limited amount of time for the aircraft to leave L.A. late enough to get the 5pm overnight drop offs in the area, and still get to SDF for the sort and make the early departures to the east coast to be delivered by the early am. As a result, long term, in order to accommodate projected volume growth while also maintaining schedule/delivery integrity, and guaranteeing low percentage of service failures, most trunk cargo aircraft will increase in gauge, not frequency (fewer flights equals more efficient use of airspace, ramp space, crews, etc). These gauge increases will then filter down the supply/delivery chain. For example, the 744 replaces the MD11 on ANC to HKG, that MD11 replaces the 767 on LA to SDF, that 767 replaces the A300 on the DEN to SDF, the DC8 replaces the 727 on the TLH SDF etc etc. I can't honestly believe that another NB freighter would sell well over the long term. I could see conversion work for exiting airframes to replace some portions of the fleet, but not huge orders.

Just my two cents.
Great points. If you can only land 25 planes per runway per hour or so, then narrow bodies are not the solution if you need more lift.......
Rocco is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 10:15 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
Default

Originally Posted by Rocco View Post
Great points. If you can only land 25 planes per runway per hour or so, then narrow bodies are not the solution if you need more lift.......
So wouldn't that mean hub and spoke (FedEx model), or maybe another hub with it's own assorted spokes that help feed the other hubs?...
bifff15 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 04:13 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rocco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by bifff15 View Post
So wouldn't that mean hub and spoke (FedEx model), or maybe another hub with it's own assorted spokes that help feed the other hubs?...
Only so many spokes (so to speak).....too expensive (and political) to add hubs. The model was around before FedEx (I would have to look when) but FedEx made it very successful.
Rocco is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11driver
Cargo
8
01-28-2006 09:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices