Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Over 60 can't land?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2008, 10:57 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

That whole thing is ridiculous. So, you can fly til 65 as the head honcho, BMOC, Captain of the crew but you can't be trusted to do it unless there's someone under 60 with you? Sounds like this whole thing was really well thought out. What a mess.
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 11:22 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
Thanks for the clarification FH. We can imagine how painful it must be to type with that terrible, debilitating, shoulder injury that you are recovering from.
Benny Hinn healed Fox Hunter.http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lvU-DislkI
MEMA300 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 11:24 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter View Post
Either the FAA has misread what ICAO has said or ALPA has misread what the FAA has said.

It is suggested that during high workload phases of flight (such as flight below 10,000 feet above ground level) at least one pilot seated at the controls should be under 60 years of age.
I don't think so. With this suggestion from ICAO, I would deduce that this whole mess is not really considered as safe. Straight from the FAA:

Our Mission
Our mission is to provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world.
Our Vision
Our vision is to improve the safety and efficiency of aviation, while being responsive to our customers and accountable to the public.




If I were the FAA I would have questions also and not jusrt accept something because congress passed a law. Yes, at this time it's law but laws change or be can interpreted differently than our "out to lunch" congressmen think.
Micro is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 12:33 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default

lol.... I'm sure the miracle's of modern medicine are about to set new level in speedy recovery's
jagplt is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 12:43 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fdxShark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Excessed B-727 Capt
Posts: 115
Default

I thought I understood this whole thing before. Now I'm confused.
fdxShark is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 01:04 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Toccata's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: DC10 Captain
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter View Post
Either the FAA has misread what ICAO has said or ALPA has misread what the FAA has said.

ICAO's standard for age 65 requires ONE pilot to be under the age of 60. The question was "What about three or four pilot crews?". The answer was that ONE pilot had to be under age 60. The other two or three could be age over age 60. It is suggested, not required, that one of the pilots in the left or right seats for T/O or Landing should be under age 60.
Key point there - ICAO knows that with two crewmembers, their rule REQUIRES one to be under 60. Only one pushing for something different was ALPA. Augmented crews - they 'desire' it.

The FAA goes a little further.

From FAA InFO 0801, dated Jan 16, 2008:

"However, ICAO and the FAA suggest that a pilot under age 60 be at the controls (a crew duty position) during critical phases of the flight (such as below 10,000 feet). The FAA expects air carriers and PICs to use best scheduling practices and crew management to ensure maximum compliance with this recommendation to have a pilot under age 60 be at the controls (a crew duty position) during critical phases of the flight (such as below 10,000 feet). Issues such as pilot seniority are not considered valid reasons for noncompliance." (emphasis mine)

That wording, ladies and gentlemen, is the start of how one agency - the one in charge of safety - will be beginning to cover their rear end. Put it on the air carriers. Then have expectations of maximum compliance, and bring up '...reasons for noncompliance'.

FH can believe in the public stance. In reality, however, I imagine some in Washington are waking up at night with the cold sweats and nightmares of something we truly hope never happens, and trying to determine how to best protect their career and divert blame.
Toccata is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 01:44 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

I can comply. Been doing that for years. But...

What is "maximum compliance"?

Is it something more than "minimum compliance"?
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 03:45 PM
  #18  
Living the dream!
 
R1200RT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 915
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
Thanks for the clarification FH. We can imagine how painful it must be to type with that terrible, debilitating, shoulder injury that you are recovering from.

My source tells me that good old FH will have to check out on the panel before he can go to the Front seat again since that is his current award. I can't wait to see how it works out for him.
R1200RT is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 04:00 PM
  #19  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by R1200RT View Post
My source tells me that good old FH will have to check out on the panel before he can go to the Front seat again since that is his current award. I can't wait to see how it works out for him.
Just a stab in the dark here but, I'm guessing you'll receive the famous "WRONG!" from his highness, FH.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:19 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Senior Skipper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: the correct seat
Posts: 1,422
Default

I guess when the 64 year old captain gets paired with the 24 year old FO who still isn't comfortable taking the plane to the crosswind limits, they'll have to declare an emergency.
Senior Skipper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
POPA
Hangar Talk
3
01-22-2008 05:17 PM
Planespotta
Hangar Talk
47
12-18-2007 01:35 PM
doogiebarnes
Regional
20
11-11-2007 08:21 AM
Fly4Beer
Major
16
01-31-2006 01:15 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
0
09-29-2005 11:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices