Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Opinions on upcoming FDX excess bids >

Opinions on upcoming FDX excess bids

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Opinions on upcoming FDX excess bids

Old 04-12-2008, 07:15 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default Opinions on upcoming FDX excess bids

How will this go down? Excerpts from our contract on Excessing

6. Excess Crew Positions

a. Pilots shall be excessed from crew positions in seniority order from among those pilots who bid to relieve that excess. If an insufficient number of pilots bid to relieve a crew position posted as excess, pilots shall be excessed from that crew position in reverse seniority order. Except as provided in Section 24.C.6.b., a pilot who has been excessed, or who has bid to relieve an excess, shall be awarded another permanent crew position in accordance with his seniority and standing bid; provided, however, no pilot may be awarded or assigned a crew position at an FDA base that would cause an excess at that base.

b. If an excessed pilot cannot be awarded a crew position due to insufficient preferences on his standing bid, the Company shall assign him to a permanent crew position with a base in the United States with the highest pay rate to which he is entitled by his seniority

c. If an excessed pilot is awarded or assigned a crew position that is also in excess, the number of pilots to be excessed from that crew position may be increased accordingly; provided, however, no pilot may be awarded or assigned a crew position at an FDA base that would cause an excess at that base.

d. If an excessed pilot is denied an award to an FDA crew position, pursuant to Section 24.C.6.a. or C.6.c., (above), and he has insufficient seniority to be awarded or assigned another crew position with the same or higher rate of pay, he shall be entitled to passover pay

Last edited by Gunter; 04-12-2008 at 07:22 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 07:20 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

When I read this I get the idea we could have a cascade effect. But not necessarily.

An excess bid for 727 FO could cause Airbus guys to get bumped back down to the Boeing. That is why, IMHO, Cassel said we could have an excess bid in the Airbus. It depends on how many relatively senior 727 FO's bid up and where they bid to. If they bid to the MD11 the Airbus may not get an excess bid.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:39 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default

when is the 777 big going to be released.. that may minimize a lot of the accordian effect in the wide body seats.

gotta love more uncertainty.
jagplt is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:50 AM
  #4  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

If we are going to excess, why are they checking out 63 year olds? CW turned 63 last month and has a training date coming up soon. The most they can get out of him is 1 year and 8 months. All to bump someone off a seat? YGTBSM! And...he has 30+ years with the company. Some things just don't make sense. Time to write your block rep and tell him it's time to defy Webb (for a change).
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
If we are going to excess, why are they checking out 63 year olds? CW turned 63 last month and has a training date coming up soon. The most they can get out of him is 1 year and 8 months. All to bump someone off a seat? YGTBSM! And...he has 30+ years with the company. Some things just don't make sense. Time to write your block rep and tell him it's time to defy Webb (for a change).
Sounds like you fellas are going through the exact same thing we are. UPS, in their infinite wisdom, has decided to train anyone who has not reached their 64th birthday by the bid closing date. Some of these guys will be in the seat for less than one year by the time they are released to the line. You just can't spell stupid without UPS.
IPAMD11FO is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 09:22 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
If we are going to excess, why are they checking out 63 year olds?
I think I know why.

The company doesn't want to pay passover or offer an early retirement package. They would rather pay for training, not now but in a couple of months, and then pay a higher hourly rate later for a year or less. Don't forget to add passover pay in the equation. If the company is going to give this guy CA pay anyway, why not make him earn it? Someone decided it was cheaper to do it this way. Heard some may not make it thru training.

Still cheaper than this guy retiring now. He is working for half pay as it is. Hence no early retirement package.

Right now there are lots of SOs on reserve that never fly. Is it cheaper to take an essentially non-productive SO, put him in training and get some actual work for a year or let him sit where he is solely to inflate the SO reserve rolls?

Last edited by Gunter; 04-12-2008 at 09:29 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:16 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownGirls YUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
How will this go down? Excerpts from our contract on Excessing

6. Excess Crew Positions

a. Pilots shall be excessed from crew positions in seniority order from among those pilots who bid to relieve that excess. If an insufficient number of pilots bid to relieve a crew position posted as excess, pilots shall be excessed from that crew position in reverse seniority order.
Oh really? Doesn't seem to be the case in practice lately, now does it?
BrownGirls YUM is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 177
Default

With the recent CDG cancellation and upcoming excess bid it appears that the company is desperately trying to pressure folks into HKG while our Union stays quiet on the sidelines (reminds me of the old military training adage of using fear, intimidation and ridicule...)

If they really wanted to balance the crew force all they would have to do is make the LOA equitable and they will never have a problem filling it (just like Subic was never a problem). However, instead they turn to scare tactics. If we really wanted to force this, all we have to do is to continue to boycott HKG and encourage those that already have the award, not sign the letter.

In the meantime, to mitigate the amount of excessed pilots and thereby saving training costs, our Union could demand the elimination of all carryover thereby creating more lines. They could also encourage the company to be more liberal with their leave of absence policy so folks can pursue outside opportunities such as military stuff, contract flying, barista at starbucks, etc. (I know OR recently changed this policy, and as usual, our Union did nothing).

SG
Some guy is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
nitefr8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 88
Default

During the Tiger merger, the then management decided it would be better to offer early retirements to some age groups than to look at the retraining costs from the excess bids they were posting. It worked. Wouldn't surprise me to see something similar pop up once they have some number with the the bids.
nitefr8r is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:38 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BOYCAPTAIN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 609
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
If we are going to excess, why are they checking out 63 year olds? CW turned 63 last month and has a training date coming up soon. The most they can get out of him is 1 year and 8 months. All to bump someone off a seat? YGTBSM! And...he has 30+ years with the company. Some things just don't make sense. Time to write your block rep and tell him it's time to defy Webb (for a change).
look..we all know webb caused this...that retro clause is killing us!...the co. is on our side on this issue....all retreads who tried to scam the system with faking shoulder injuries..."special" projects etc, are being forced to complete dc-10 so school(if they make it) and then are being forced to complete captain school(if they make it)...a lot of these older guys were hoping to get passover and sit at home....we will see!
BOYCAPTAIN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices