Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Enough FDX - time for another Brown thread! >

Enough FDX - time for another Brown thread!

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Enough FDX - time for another Brown thread!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2008, 04:27 PM
  #21  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by JethroFDX View Post
Hey, I like the whiteboard commercials........really.
I do too...because they're not ours!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 04:56 PM
  #22  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
I do too...because they're not ours!
SORRY, we don't have movies with Tom Hanks and volleyballs.

CactusCrew is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 06:38 PM
  #23  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 747-400 FO
Posts: 6
Default

Anyone hear our 767 order in jeopardy, due to Airforce going with Airbus and Boeing wanting to shut down the 767 line. Just heard it from two different line pilots.
jowcl65 is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 06:55 PM
  #24  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
SORRY, we don't have movies with Tom Hanks and volleyballs.


That's because UPS turned it down with it was offered to Brown first!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 03:38 AM
  #25  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
That's because UPS turned it down with it was offered to Brown first!
WELL, it wouldn't be a good idea unless Fred had done it first ... we know that !

CactusCrew is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 04:00 AM
  #26  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
WELL, it wouldn't be a good idea unless Fred had done it first ... we know that !

True, you have a point there!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 04:05 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Hey, you guys have "The King of Queens" though.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 07:00 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JethroFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B767 Capt.
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
SORRY, we don't have movies with Tom Hanks and volleyballs.

That's right, we're a step up. We have sock puppets.
JethroFDX is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 12:32 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by jowcl65 View Post
Anyone hear our 767 order in jeopardy, due to Airforce going with Airbus and Boeing wanting to shut down the 767 line. Just heard it from two different line pilots.
Hopefully not, given this article...

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...acity-gap.html

DATE:14/04/08
SOURCE:Flightglobal.com
Boeing suggests 767-300ERs to help solve the 787 capacity gap
By Max Kingsley-Jones

Boeing has yet to tell 787 customers exactly how their delivery schedules will be impacted by the latest delay, but it has floated the idea of producing brand new 767-300ERs to help fill the capacity gap.

Dreamliner deliveries will not now begin until the third quarter of next year - at least six months later than planned - and production ramp-up will then be much slower than previously expected with output not due to reach 10 a month until 2012.

This will have a major impact on widebody capacity growth worldwide, and while Airbus is already expanding its A330 output, there is likely to be insufficient interim lift available to fill the void.

One industry source told Flight International that these fears have already resulted in widebody values being "artificially high". As Boeing looks at ways of bridging the capacity shortfall, sources say that one option being examined is to redirect the 767 production planned for its now defunct KC-X tanker bid towards the passenger market.

While such a move would be a costly exercise, the airframer is already facing calls from some customers to help fund their interim leases and this option would enable it to assist with an asset that could eventually be redeployed in the freight market.

Qantas chief executive Geoff Dixon has already stated that he believes Boeing should assume the lease costs for six Airbus A330s that the airline plans to acquire for its Jetstar division to help it overcome the capacity shortfall brought about by the 787 delay. Dixon adds that Qantas may look for additional capacity beyond the six A330s.

The US airframer is known to have put the 767 "lease" proposal to some of its 787 customers. Boeing declines to comment on the details of any discussions, saying only: "We will work with each of our customers individually to understand the impact of the delays on their business and how to mitigate those impacts."

Two early customers likely to be seriously affected by the production delay are major US carriers Continental Airlines and Northwest Airlines.

With both due to receive early 787 deliveries, their long-haul network growth plans are built around the new twinjets with, for example, the 787 earmarked to introduce new flights to China next year.
Precontact is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tanker-driver
Military
21
10-13-2007 07:12 AM
sigtauenus
Military
23
07-25-2007 06:26 AM
Happy Camper
Major
6
02-14-2006 02:04 PM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
0
01-24-2006 06:48 PM
TipTip35
Cargo
13
01-22-2006 03:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices