Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Recent FedEx ALPA MEC Resolution >

Recent FedEx ALPA MEC Resolution

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Recent FedEx ALPA MEC Resolution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2008, 07:15 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: DA-40
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by md11phlyer View Post
No they are not the same. Yet this administration can be lumped together as both "Right-Wing" and "Fascist" due to their corporatism and blind nationalism.

PM me your email and I'll send you a good tax study on the 3 candidates. I think you'll find that the differences are very subtle.
I wish this administration were "right-wing".... unfortunately they are neither conservative nor right wing.

Blind nationalism---I could only wish---this administration has proven to practice big-time globalism vs. blind nationalism. I feel extremely lucky we don't already have foreign pilots and airlines flying between US cities.
MalteseX is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:36 AM
  #22  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by hamfisted View Post
Conservative, Liberal or Libertarian.......this resolution by our MEC accomplishes nothing in the big picture. It is simply a way for our MEC to try to "make up" for blatantly ignoring their constituents when it REALLY mattered. The Age 65 issue significantly did long term damage to the career development of most, if not all, pilots under 55 yet they now try to throw us a bone and tell us they wouldn't support a candidate at the national level. What they are in reality saying is..."This time we would be scalped if we didn't listen to the results of the polling data". Should we say "thank you Fedex MEC" for finally listening to us??
Way to go Ham!!! Finally someone has said it. Smoke and mirrors from the MEC, smoke and mirrors.

Who cares about the political process anyway. They are all just rich folks out for their own gains anyway. No matter who is endorsed or elected we will all continue to lose.
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 08:18 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by hamfisted View Post
Conservative, Liberal or Libertarian.......this resolution by our MEC accomplishes nothing in the big picture. It is simply a way for our MEC to try to "make up" for blatantly ignoring their constituents when it REALLY mattered. The Age 65 issue significantly did long term damage to the career development of most, if not all, pilots under 55 yet they now try to throw us a bone and tell us they wouldn't support a candidate at the national level. What they are in reality saying is..."This time we would be scalped if we didn't listen to the results of the polling data". Should we say "thank you Fedex MEC" for finally listening to us??
Ham,

So I guess it's too late and the horse has left the barn. I guess in the future there'd be nothing FedEx ALPA (and more specifically, the FedEx MEC) could do to make you happy. Oh well, it's too bad, because judging by your post, you've got more than a few more years here. You might rethink your opinion, if for no other reason than hating an organization, and letting it grate on you for a long period of time is bad for your health.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:45 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by hamfisted View Post
Conservative, Liberal or Libertarian.......this resolution by our MEC accomplishes nothing in the big picture. It is simply a way for our MEC to try to "make up" for blatantly ignoring their constituents when it REALLY mattered. The Age 65 issue significantly did long term damage to the career development of most, if not all, pilots under 55 yet they now try to throw us a bone and tell us they wouldn't support a candidate at the national level. What they are in reality saying is..."This time we would be scalped if we didn't listen to the results of the polling data". Should we say "thank you Fedex MEC" for finally listening to us??
So, if the FDX MEC had fought age 65, it would not have gone through? This is about the 200 over 60 guys who are now able to go to a left seat if their seniority allows it. The MEC did do the right thing just like they are in stating they will not allow the bottom 200 guys to be furloughed. The over 60 guys seniority is no less important than the guy who is concerned about a furlough. If you start sacrificing one segment of seniority, then the box has been opened and we all need to watch out to see if we are next. We all got hired knowing it is a seniority based system, the top guy has it great and the bottom guy waits until it is his turn.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:53 AM
  #25  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
So, if the FDX MEC had fought age 65, it would not have gone through? This is about the 200 over 60 guys who are now able to go to a left seat if their seniority allows it. The MEC did do the right thing just like they are in stating they will not allow the bottom 200 guys to be furloughed. The over 60 guys seniority is no less important than the guy who is concerned about a furlough. If you start sacrificing one segment of seniority, then the box has been opened and we all need to watch out to see if we are next. We all got hired knowing it is a seniority based system, the top guy has it great and the bottom guy waits until it is his turn.
I guess we could have had a vote to see whether, we, the dues paying members, wanted DW to alter the wording to include the over 60 group. Then, of course, he could've "done the right thing" and voted the wishes of the unwashed masses who pay his salary. Nah.....that's a lousy idea.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:54 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Piloto Noche's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
We all got hired knowing it is a seniority based system, the top guy has it great and the bottom guy waits until it is his turn.
Yea, and we also all got hired knowing Age 60 was it and you were gone! Now the bottom guy can wait another five years.

The MEC SHOULD HAVE listened to it's pilot group and voted against the rule change. THEN, if it passed, they could have pushed the seniority angle to get DW's buddies back into the left seat because it was the right thing to do.
Piloto Noche is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:39 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by Piloto Noche View Post
Yea, and we also all got hired knowing Age 60 was it and you were gone! Now the bottom guy can wait another five years.
Things change. I guess if you got hired before Oct31 2006, you should be working for the old pay scale and not be able to fly the 757 or 777 since they weren't on the property. I'm not saying it doesn't suck, but make some lemonade.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:41 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
I guess we could have had a vote to see whether, we, the dues paying members, wanted DW to alter the wording to include the over 60 group. Then, of course, he could've "done the right thing" and voted the wishes of the unwashed masses who pay his salary. Nah.....that's a lousy idea.
I've got an idea. Why don't we take a vote requiring anyone who has been a widebody capt for more than 5 years to have to down bid so that all of us that can't hold it right now can get our chance to get a high five. Once everyone has made 5 years pay at widebody rate, then we go back to the old seniority system.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 11:48 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 356
Default No....not ALPA...our MEC

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Ham,

So I guess it's too late and the horse has left the barn. I guess in the future there'd be nothing FedEx ALPA (and more specifically, the FedEx MEC) could do to make you happy. Oh well, it's too bad, because judging by your post, you've got more than a few more years here. You might rethink your opinion, if for no other reason than hating an organization, and letting it grate on you for a long period of time is bad for your health.
JJ,
All I'm saying is that this specific issue is nothing more than a paper tiger that our MEC is using to try to convince us they can and will make a stand in "our best interests". I support ALPA and am not, as you depict me, someone who "hates an organization". I am not going to be hoodwinked on such a trivial issue when I have no faith that this MEC will not at some point in the future go against the desire of the "vast majority" of their constituents beause "they know best". Please don't try to throw me into an inaccurate category you feel more comfortable dealing with me from.
hamfisted is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 11:50 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
I've got an idea. Why don't we take a vote requiring anyone who has been a widebody capt for more than 5 years to have to down bid so that all of us that can't hold it right now can get our chance to get a high five. Once everyone has made 5 years pay at widebody rate, then we go back to the old seniority system.
Pin,
Please tell me this is not a serious response about such a serious issue.
hamfisted is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices