FDX: Morningstar gives 5 stars
08-27-2008, 02:39 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
FDX: Morningstar gives 5 stars
Morningstar.com
Rain, Sleet, or High Oil Prices: Can This Firm Deliver?
Tuesday August 26, 5:00 pm ET
By Jeff Viksjo
Following is a sampling of stocks that recently jumped to 5 stars. By way of background, we award a stock 5 stars when it trades at a suitably large discount--i.e., a margin of safety--to our fair value estimate. Thus, when a stock hits 5-star territory, we consider it an especially compelling value.
FedEx Corporation
Moat: Narrow
FV Uncertainty: Medium
Price/Fair Value Ratio*: 0.74
Three-Year Expected Annual Return*: 21.9%
What It Does: FedEx (NYSE:FDX - News), which pioneered overnight delivery in 1973 and remains the world's largest express delivery firm, derives two thirds of its revenue from its express division. The company's ground segment delivers small parcels at a lower cost than express to the entire United States, and the freight segment provides less-than-truckload freight services. FedEx Kinko's provides document production technology, Web-based printing, Internet access, and ground and express shipping services.
What Gives It an Edge: According to Morningstar analyst Keith Schoonmaker, FedEx's broad U.S. parcel shipping network, dense shipment volume, and international presence establish an economic moat matched only by its close competitor United Parcel Service (NYSE:UPS - News). As evidence of FedEx's moat, Schoonmaker points to DHL's recent struggles in the U.S. express delivery market, which underscore the powerful barriers to entry in this industry: Despite its global shipping expertise, DHL's U.S. operations generated annual losses approaching $1 billion. Unlike FedEx, DHL lacks a complete network and established pipeline of parcel traffic, so it could not turn a profit without enduring tremendous up-front expenses. In the domestic market, Schoonmaker contends that FedEx and UPS are rational competitors, passing through fuel price increases in order to stay healthy and raising general rates to compensate for inflation, rather than competing away their profits. Also, FedEx has deepened its U.S. offerings by acquiring heavy freight trucking capability, and it has established a retail presence by acquiring Kinko's (now FedEx Office). Furthermore, FedEx derives 28% of revenue from international operations and continues to expand global operations, with particular focus on China.
What the Risks Are: FedEx faces several risks. As the firm expands into developing nations such as China and India, continuing success depends not only on busy, healthy domestic and global economies, but also on continued stable conditions in these regions. Domestically, drivers who are currently contractors may seek to become classified as employees; indeed, a small number of drivers in three facilities recently voted to approve collective bargaining. Widespread unionization may reduce FedEx's ability to flex shipping capacity to match demand.
What the Market Is Missing: Schoonmaker believes the market is punishing FedEx shares unjustly due to recent slower-than-historical earnings growth, owing mainly to higher fuel prices. In Schoonmaker's view, high fuel prices will not only constrain earnings until FedEx's fuel surcharges catch up to jet and diesel fuel price increases, but also burden the general economy such that customers downshift to slower, less-profitable FedEx shipping products. While Schoonmaker admits that this double hit to FedEx should result in margin contraction as the economy remains soft, he counters that the firm should also benefit when the economy recovers. Also, Schoonmaker thinks the market may be considering the recent write-down of intangible assets added in the 2004 acquisition of Kinko's. Although noncash write-downs do not affect Schoonmaker's valuation, they confirm his opinion that FedEx overpaid for low-margin retail assets in exchange for high-margin packages. Nonetheless, Schoonmaker argues that FedEx will still remain one of two powerful integrated shippers in the U.S.--a lucrative and defendable long-run position. With short-term issues hampering the stock, Schoonmaker believes investors have a rare opportunity to purchase FedEx at a substantial discount to its fair value.
* Price/fair value ratios and expected returns calculated using fair value estimates, closing prices, and cost of equity estimates as of Friday, Aug. 22, 2008.
Rain, Sleet, or High Oil Prices: Can This Firm Deliver?
Tuesday August 26, 5:00 pm ET
By Jeff Viksjo
Following is a sampling of stocks that recently jumped to 5 stars. By way of background, we award a stock 5 stars when it trades at a suitably large discount--i.e., a margin of safety--to our fair value estimate. Thus, when a stock hits 5-star territory, we consider it an especially compelling value.
FedEx Corporation
Moat: Narrow
FV Uncertainty: Medium
Price/Fair Value Ratio*: 0.74
Three-Year Expected Annual Return*: 21.9%
What It Does: FedEx (NYSE:FDX - News), which pioneered overnight delivery in 1973 and remains the world's largest express delivery firm, derives two thirds of its revenue from its express division. The company's ground segment delivers small parcels at a lower cost than express to the entire United States, and the freight segment provides less-than-truckload freight services. FedEx Kinko's provides document production technology, Web-based printing, Internet access, and ground and express shipping services.
What Gives It an Edge: According to Morningstar analyst Keith Schoonmaker, FedEx's broad U.S. parcel shipping network, dense shipment volume, and international presence establish an economic moat matched only by its close competitor United Parcel Service (NYSE:UPS - News). As evidence of FedEx's moat, Schoonmaker points to DHL's recent struggles in the U.S. express delivery market, which underscore the powerful barriers to entry in this industry: Despite its global shipping expertise, DHL's U.S. operations generated annual losses approaching $1 billion. Unlike FedEx, DHL lacks a complete network and established pipeline of parcel traffic, so it could not turn a profit without enduring tremendous up-front expenses. In the domestic market, Schoonmaker contends that FedEx and UPS are rational competitors, passing through fuel price increases in order to stay healthy and raising general rates to compensate for inflation, rather than competing away their profits. Also, FedEx has deepened its U.S. offerings by acquiring heavy freight trucking capability, and it has established a retail presence by acquiring Kinko's (now FedEx Office). Furthermore, FedEx derives 28% of revenue from international operations and continues to expand global operations, with particular focus on China.
What the Risks Are: FedEx faces several risks. As the firm expands into developing nations such as China and India, continuing success depends not only on busy, healthy domestic and global economies, but also on continued stable conditions in these regions. Domestically, drivers who are currently contractors may seek to become classified as employees; indeed, a small number of drivers in three facilities recently voted to approve collective bargaining. Widespread unionization may reduce FedEx's ability to flex shipping capacity to match demand.
What the Market Is Missing: Schoonmaker believes the market is punishing FedEx shares unjustly due to recent slower-than-historical earnings growth, owing mainly to higher fuel prices. In Schoonmaker's view, high fuel prices will not only constrain earnings until FedEx's fuel surcharges catch up to jet and diesel fuel price increases, but also burden the general economy such that customers downshift to slower, less-profitable FedEx shipping products. While Schoonmaker admits that this double hit to FedEx should result in margin contraction as the economy remains soft, he counters that the firm should also benefit when the economy recovers. Also, Schoonmaker thinks the market may be considering the recent write-down of intangible assets added in the 2004 acquisition of Kinko's. Although noncash write-downs do not affect Schoonmaker's valuation, they confirm his opinion that FedEx overpaid for low-margin retail assets in exchange for high-margin packages. Nonetheless, Schoonmaker argues that FedEx will still remain one of two powerful integrated shippers in the U.S.--a lucrative and defendable long-run position. With short-term issues hampering the stock, Schoonmaker believes investors have a rare opportunity to purchase FedEx at a substantial discount to its fair value.
* Price/fair value ratios and expected returns calculated using fair value estimates, closing prices, and cost of equity estimates as of Friday, Aug. 22, 2008.
08-27-2008, 05:12 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 151
Then there's this...
Postal Service Stats Put FedEx, UPS At Risk
ANALYSTS FRET PACKAGE DELIVERERS’ FORTUNES
The number of parcels and packages that postal workers are toting around the country has declined sharply, according to government statistics, opening the prospect of fresh liabilities for the U.S. Postal Service’s private-enterprise rivals, analysts said. According to the data, challenging economic conditions, the end of stimulus checks, and inflation in fuel prices have contributed to a pronounced selloff in package deliveries. Express mail shipments fell 14% in the quarter that ended in June, the most recent data available. Priority mail shipments declined 6% in the period. The pullback could have direct implications for FedEx (FDX), which has made as much as $1.2 billion a year flying priority mail packages for the USPS. But there are threats to the franchises of FedEx as well as United Parcel Service (UPS) simply from industry pressures. The USPS data suggested that package shippers have gotten more cost-conscious about their shipping activities. FedEx’s May quarter showed that daily domestic air freight declined about 15%, including its priority shipping business. Nevertheless, both FedEx and UPS have ticked up about 1% in Wednesday’s trading.
ANALYSTS FRET PACKAGE DELIVERERS’ FORTUNES
The number of parcels and packages that postal workers are toting around the country has declined sharply, according to government statistics, opening the prospect of fresh liabilities for the U.S. Postal Service’s private-enterprise rivals, analysts said. According to the data, challenging economic conditions, the end of stimulus checks, and inflation in fuel prices have contributed to a pronounced selloff in package deliveries. Express mail shipments fell 14% in the quarter that ended in June, the most recent data available. Priority mail shipments declined 6% in the period. The pullback could have direct implications for FedEx (FDX), which has made as much as $1.2 billion a year flying priority mail packages for the USPS. But there are threats to the franchises of FedEx as well as United Parcel Service (UPS) simply from industry pressures. The USPS data suggested that package shippers have gotten more cost-conscious about their shipping activities. FedEx’s May quarter showed that daily domestic air freight declined about 15%, including its priority shipping business. Nevertheless, both FedEx and UPS have ticked up about 1% in Wednesday’s trading.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
