Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   FDX- Approach question (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/30950-fdx-approach-question.html)

dundem 09-10-2008 08:41 AM

FDX- Approach question
 
Hey Fedexers,

Question for you- I remember reading a thread well over a year ago about hand-flown CAT III approaches at Fedex- am I remembering correctly?

Thanks

FDXer 09-10-2008 08:54 AM


Originally Posted by dundem (Post 459125)
Hey Fedexers,

Question for you- I remember reading a thread well over a year ago about hand-flown CAT III approaches at Fedex- am I remembering correctly?

Thanks


They're not done. Is that what you remember?

hyperone 09-10-2008 10:56 AM

At least for a few more years until the HUD's with the FLIR enhanced vision system are installed. Could be seeing hand-flown Cat III's after that.
But for now, coupled, auto-land only to Cat III capable runways.

MacGuy2 09-10-2008 11:55 AM

A long time ago we use to do hand flown approaches to 100 feet in the sim as part of recurrent training. I wonder if that's what dundem was thinking about?

MG2

dundem 09-10-2008 01:26 PM

Thanks for the replies.

I vaguely remember a 727 driver mentioning hand-flown Cat III approaches...I guess it could've been in the sim only. I searched, but didn't turn up anything.

Busboy 09-10-2008 01:28 PM

They were testing HUDs in the 727s in the 80's. That's why the speakers were in weird places on some of them. They had to be moved to install the HUD. Captain's side only, of course.

fr8rcaptain 09-10-2008 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by dundem (Post 459125)
Hey Fedexers,

Question for you- I remember reading a thread well over a year ago about hand-flown CAT III approaches at Fedex- am I remembering correctly?

Thanks

We (UPS) WERE flying hand flown CatIII approaches to a DA of 100 feet (700 RVR) with the HUD in our 727 100s. Worked like a champ: just keep the thing inside the thing type flight director. I'm an old hud cripple from my previous life, so it all made sense to me.

I flew two actual hand flown Cat III approaches in the 72. Both worked out GREAT! Nice off the shelf system.:cool:

290kts 09-11-2008 04:52 AM

"We (UPS) WERE flying hand flown CatIII approaches to a DA of 100 feet (700 RVR)"


We call those Cat II at FedEx

PastV1 09-11-2008 06:05 AM

Hand flown to 100 ft used to be part of the type ride. I believe the FAA did away with it and that's why we don't have to fly it anymore.




Originally Posted by MacGuy2 (Post 459271)
A long time ago we use to do hand flown approaches to 100 feet in the sim as part of recurrent training. I wonder if that's what dundem was thinking about?

MG2


Daniel Larusso 09-11-2008 07:50 AM

290kts,

He has to be referring to Cat III by definition. By basic FAR/AIM definition, a Cat II can't go lower than 1200 RVR, although we know from OPS Specs that it can go down to 1000RVR with autoland. To get a number as low as 700, they had to be doing a CAT III, they just had to make the decision on whether or not the airplane was going to land where it's supposed to at a higher altitude than we do probably because they were hand flying it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands