Latest on ups furough threat
Spoke to someone close to waz happening with furluogh mitigation talks and stated that ups in not interested on voluntary and military leaves or retirements, They would like to open up the contract and renegotiate some things that will bring them lot more than 54mil. Who knows what will happen but with ipa not budging and ups being stubborn i'm not getting a fuzzy feeling about this.:confused:
|
Originally Posted by brownie
(Post 592222)
Spoke to someone close to waz happening with furluogh mitigation talks and stated that ups in not interested on voluntary and military leaves or retirements, They would like to open up the contract and renegotiate some things that will bring them lot more than 54mil. Who knows what will happen but with ipa not budging and ups being stubborn i'm not getting a fuzzy feeling about this.:confused:
Someone from the IPA please write a MRB and tell these clowns our contract NOT due for negotiation and they can go shove it! |
Originally Posted by brownie
(Post 592222)
Spoke to someone close to waz happening with furluogh mitigation talks and stated that ups in not interested on voluntary and military leaves or retirements, They would like to open up the contract and renegotiate some things that will bring them lot more than 54mil. Who knows what will happen but with ipa not budging and ups being stubborn i'm not getting a fuzzy feeling about this.:confused:
|
Originally Posted by say that again
(Post 592233)
The sooner this group figures out that this is not about costs but rather about control the better off we'll all be.
I've been furloughed before. Didn't get a pre-furlough notice before the actual furlough notice. That was just a means to ask for concessions. If it was only about overstaffing and the need to furlough, we would not have found out until the June 1 letters for the Sept 1 round of furloughs. |
Originally Posted by CactusCrew
(Post 592236)
I said that when the furlough was first announced ... FWIW. Well that it was more about concessions than an actual furlough.
I've been furloughed before. Didn't get a pre-furlough notice before the actual furlough notice. That was just a means to ask for concessions. If it was only about overstaffing and the need to furlough, we would not have found out until the June 1 letters for the Sept 1 round of furloughs. So why is our union wasting time with them again? Are they just playing the game, or is BM really that stupid? |
Originally Posted by SLPII
(Post 592250)
EXACTLY!!!! So obvious isn't it?
So why is our union wasting time with them again? Are they just playing the game, or is BM really that stupid? |
Originally Posted by FrontSeat
(Post 592238)
And the sooner guys quit picking up open time the better off we will be..It's happening every day often !!
|
Lets hope Miller has learned lessons from days gone by and not give in down the road. I am not confident that he has, only time will tell.
|
Originally Posted by SLPII
(Post 592230)
hahaha...
Someone from the IPA please write a MRB and tell these clowns our contract NOT due for negotiation and they can go shove it!
Originally Posted by SLPII
(Post 592250)
EXACTLY!!!! So obvious isn't it?
So why is our union wasting time with them again? Are they just playing the game, or is BM really that stupid? BM isn't a dictator, the EB has input, and has great sway. Not a one person show. You may disagree with the strategy, but yours is contradictory, so ....... :confused: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands