Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS/Menlo/SCS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2006, 12:40 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Trash Hauler 1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 325
Default UPS/Menlo/SCS

Haven't been able to verify this completely yet, but it looks like all you guys working for CAT, Ryan, etc may still be flying our freight around for the foreseeable future. Learned through our union that UPS is considering our heavy freight division to be part of SCS and not covered under our scope rules. Not a done deal, but it appears we won't be adding on as much flying as we originally thought. YMMV

TH1
Trash Hauler 1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 02:13 PM
  #2  
New ride...
 
1800 RVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default

It would be nice to hear directly from the union that says they are aware of this, they are working on it, new scope language covers this, etc. Seems that UPS has been working their angle in how to interpret this whole Menlo thing - I hope we have done the same, not just saying it is contractual. I've been trying to understand the audio broadcast of the scope roundtable as well as digesting things from the B & G. There are some very interesting interpretations out there. Makes one wonder...
1800 RVR is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 02:49 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,909
Default

The UPS company mascot, Browntail, must be disapointed about contracters flying freight from KDAY. On a serious note however was there an issue with UPS flying hazmat? Is that part of the equation?
captjns is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 02:58 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Trash Hauler 1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 325
Default Not from DAY

They won't be flying the Menlo stuff from Dayton, but SDF. The company is building a huge freight facility, (supposed to be bigger than the Emery hub), adjacent to the main part of the Worker's Paradise. It will be difficult to see all the contractors loading our freight on our ramp, but probably no harder than it was for them to see the DAY hub close. Sure hope the union has an ace up their sleeve on this one. I'd say my individual participation in the fuel savings program just ended.

TH1
Trash Hauler 1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 03:29 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by Trash Hauler 1
Haven't been able to verify this completely yet, but it looks like all you guys working for CAT, Ryan, etc may still be flying our freight around for the foreseeable future. Learned through our union that UPS is considering our heavy freight division to be part of SCS and not covered under our scope rules. Not a done deal, but it appears we won't be adding on as much flying as we originally thought. YMMV

TH1
Hey Trashhauler, I think you are wrong on this one. We will be flying the Menlo stuff and unfortunately CAT and others will bite the bullet. Menlo cannot come under SCS. The contract languague is clear as day and it would be a breach. It's just a nasty rumor that we are not flying it. I'll bet you one of those green bottles of water that we get!
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 04:24 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Trash Hauler 1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 325
Default I wish you were right!

According to the toads that speak to the CLW and to Art Luby, that whole new heavy freight complex comes under the control of SCS. Luby has further said that we cannot be guaranteed the SCS flying. I don't see how the contract can allow it, but our scope expert basically has said we can't demand the flying that SCS generates, including Menlo once it is fully integrated into SCS. Sucks, but that's what the experts are saying. That said, I believe we should still go after every bit of the SCS flying, since they are a subsidiary of the parent UPS.

Regards
TH1
Trash Hauler 1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 05:35 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Freighter Captain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: -400 CAPT
Posts: 483
Default

Seinfeld has it bottled up, Trash. UPS will not be using any of the 727 and A-300 contracts past this summer. I'm sure they'd love to, however
Freighter Captain is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 10:50 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nightrider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 248
Default not true

I am in possession of an email from B.T. the union attorney and he talked to T.C. the companies main attorney. T.C. said that the cargo planning guy misspoke and they would be releasing a statement to confirm this, and the IPA will be flying that cargo. He said it may take a day or two it has to go through labor.

nightrider
nightrider is offline  
Old 05-18-2006, 02:54 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by Trash Hauler 1
I'd say my individual participation in the fuel savings program just ended.
Fuel savings program? What's that?
IPAMD11FO is offline  
Old 05-18-2006, 03:49 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,909
Default

Bottom line... will contract haulers be flying freight past June 30? And if so will they be treated with respect on the UPS ramps?
captjns is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices