![]() |
Can we please get back to why we are unable to safely fly airplanes? It's an area that concerns me as I would like to salvage the remains of my career.
PIPE |
Originally Posted by av8rmike
(Post 606088)
I haven't found a sim yet that isn't more squirrely than the aircraft it emulates.
L |
Originally Posted by pipe
(Post 607431)
Can we please get back to why we are unable to safely fly airplanes? It's an area that concerns me as I would like to salvage the remains of my career.
PIPE |
Originally Posted by FoxHunter
(Post 607709)
Simple answer is that you have to fly airplanes to fly safe airplanes. My guess is that if you always put the A/P on at 500' and click it off at 200' you may not be as safe as you should be. Then you add in the fact some have more miles in NWA First Class than FedEx cockpits. The 727 fleet does not appear to have a problem, wonder why?:rolleyes:
PIPE |
Originally Posted by Busboy
(Post 607013)
Some of our pilots have only landed in headwinds, prior to coming to FDX.
And, I can't believe that no one has brought up the "Coriolis Effect", in regards to landing a great big swept wing jumbo jet airplane, in a cross wind. What do the Northern Lights have to do with anything? :confused:;) |
Originally Posted by pipe
(Post 607752)
Yeah, I too thought Tallahasee was no big deal -- 'twas but a flesh wound, really.
PIPE |
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 607812)
Well, they were still flying when they hit the ground. Although during the approach and landing phase, it was more of a CFIT than landing problem.
Ya know....I was going to roll in hot on FH's comment.....Thought it was one of the most myopic, parochial and id"!ot!c of his many posts.....but then I read the above quote. FDX727........there are just no words for how.......ostrich like.....your post is. 1st it foments class (equipment) divisivement, 2nd it is incredibly dis-respectful and insensitive, and 3rd just plain highlights the fact that the hole you have stuck your own ostrich head in is indeed your own Bun&ho!e......the problems we face are systemic and cross all equipment, seniority and background lines. Perhaps a refocus on such issues as scheduling practices and fatigue would yield more progress and industry advancing solutions. JMHO :confused::cool: |
Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
(Post 607824)
Perhaps a refocus on such issues as scheduling practices and fatigue would yield more progress and industry advancing solutions. JMHO :confused::cool:
Here ... here! |
[quote=highflyer;606185]
Originally Posted by PastV1
(Post 606140)
Guess you never fly the 727-200- 2S2F Sim! It ib n no way simulated the actual aircraft.
I agree. and in no way does the MD-11 sim compare to the real airplane when it comes to crosswind landings. You fly the real airplane to the runway, in the sim you plug in the aileron and if you take it out you're screwed. I can play the game like anyone else, but the sim just can't teach you a realistic crosswind landing. I once knew a check airman (at the previous airline) who was proud of the fact that he was able to convince the Sim techs to adjust the 747 simulator to require more rudder than the Aircraft during a V1 cut. He believed that it got students to “use their feet better.” Maybe something like that is going on here. |
[quote=SilverEagle;607831]
Originally Posted by highflyer
(Post 606185)
..I once knew a check airman (at the previous airline) who was proud of the fact that he was able to convince the Sim techs to adjust the 747 simulator to require more rudder than the Aircraft during a V1 cut. He believed that it got students to “use their feet better.” Maybe something like that is going on here....
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands