Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Some good news for a change >

FDX - Some good news for a change

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Some good news for a change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009, 01:23 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MeXC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Did it last summer (NOQ has been a threat for some time for junior ANC11Fs). It is a full profile, and I believe a jeopardy event. That said, like any sim, it's a great deal dependent on who's giving you the sim.
MeXC is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 04:37 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

delete delete

Last edited by Gunter; 07-08-2009 at 05:00 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 04:59 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Good news for FedEx ground in Chicago. But the economic recovery, when it arrives, will likely affect different divisions unequally.

FedEx Ground Celebrates Opening of New Chicago Distribution Hub - Yahoo! Finance


The network enhancements have resulted in accelerating ground service delivery by one day or more in more than half of the United States. FedEx Ground delivers more than 50 percent of packages in two days or fewer and more than 80 percent of packages in three days or fewer. Additionally, average daily package volumes have increased by more than 50 percent from 2.1 million in 2003 to more than 3.4 million today.

I wish Express still carried some of what has gone to ground....
Gunter is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 09:35 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
Fdx: On an absolutely different subject, has anyone recently gone into the sim for landing currency? I have vacation and mil commitments coming up and I might get close. Who do you call and what kind of harrassment can I expect? I was told (hopefully another bad crew bus rumor) that you get a full PC even if you haven't gone noncurrent. Thanks in advance for your help.
I would have started a new thread, but figured this wasn't interesting enough to warrant it.
Airbus: 3 & 3 with X-winds on a couple, CAT III and a V1 cut to a landing.

Anytime you get in the box, if you are a buffoon you are going to be in jeopardy. Otherwise, there is plenty of time in there to get up to speed.
MX727 is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 09:52 AM
  #15  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by MX727 View Post
Airbus: 3 & 3 with X-winds on a couple, CAT III and a V1 cut to a landing.

Anytime you get in the box, if you are a buffoon you are going to be in jeopardy. Otherwise, there is plenty of time in there to get up to speed.
I'm just curious, but why do you need a V1 cut and a Cat III to maintain landing currency? Typical cobra pit-esque response from our training department? More FAA bulls--t? If you only need 3 & 3, you should just be able to get 3 & 3. Seems like punishment, which around here doesn't surprise me.

???
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 09:59 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
Default

It was explained to me that if you didn't fly enough to stay current, that they thought you needed a little more "review" in the sim that just a 3 and 3. Said something about an event that happened at UAL with an f/o that was always getting his 3 and 3 in the sim, and things went downhill fast when something went wrong on the plane one day.

I dunno, just passing along the rumor.
FedEx1 is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 10:26 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 99
Default

Heard a similar explanation. Years ago a UAL 747-400 F/O almost crashed into a hill top tower departing SFO after an engine failure. Or it could be said "the Captain allowed him to fly the plane almost into a hilltop".

Bottom line: It is the Captain's responsibility.
OffRoad5150 is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:08 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 329
Default

Originally Posted by MEMFO4Ever View Post
I'm just curious, but why do you need a V1 cut and a Cat III to maintain landing currency? Typical cobra pit-esque response from our training department? More FAA bulls--t? If you only need 3 & 3, you should just be able to get 3 & 3. Seems like punishment, which around here doesn't surprise me.

???
How about this:

FAR Part § 121.439: Pilot qualification: Recent experience -- FAA FARS, 14 CFR

A paid trip to the sim to maintain currency and only do three take-offs and three landings? Why? If you're that close to going non-current, you can probably use the extra training. No one is out to get anyone, it's just common sense.
av8rmike is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 02:11 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Re: The UAL 747-400 F/O story.

True. I got to see a re-enactment video using the CVR transcript and testimony from all players during recurrent while at UAL. Ugly. The EO SID to the west follows a radial to a saddle in the hills. They didn't follow the radial and skimmed some high end real estate up on the bay area hills.

This was when they were dropping trips with pay, providing positive space first class DH to DEN and getting you 3/3 in 20 minutes.

Doesn't seem like a V1 cut, xw landings and a few cats and dogs living together is asking too much if your currency is stretched thin, IMO. If you can't bring game to the sim or the line check you always drop, what makes you think you'll have it when you need it? Just sayin'
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 06:04 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

I don't mind flying any of these maneuvers, but if it a checking event, I would rather just do the 3 and 3. Most of us have been fortunate on checkrides or we probably wouldn't be here, but I don't volunteer them. Oh well, I guess I'll have to do one of these pretty soon anyway. Does anyone know who I call to set one of these things up?
golfandfly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
machz990
Cargo
34
02-06-2010 11:42 AM
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
DWN3GRN
Hangar Talk
15
10-14-2008 03:32 PM
RV-7
Cargo
15
09-03-2008 09:02 PM
Airsupport
Regional
62
08-10-2008 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices