Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent? >

FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Will 4a2b be permanent?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2009, 08:52 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Question

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Someone needs to explain a few things to me. These things are not just happening during our peak period.

How is counting on makeup requests to fly innumerable extra's 'Preventing or delaying a furlough'?

How is reducing reserve coverage to unprecedented low levels for our most valuable flying, intl' MD-11, 'Preventing or delaying a furlough'?

How is maintaining a very high line average with very low reserve coverage in the 757 'Preventing or delaying a furlough'? Guess who picks up their extras? Yes, the 727.

How do big carryover pairings 'Prevent or delay a furlough'?

How is optimizing the schedule, whether or not OR realizes it is happening, 'Preventing or delaying a furlough'?

How is relying on draft and volunteer on a regular basis 'Preventing or delaying a furlough'?

These are the questions that should be answered by those in high places. Or maybe our new poster, Chuck Turpen, has some of the answers. From his posts I gather he is smarter than most of us.
Any "Management-sponsored Hub Turn Mtgs" scheduled lately?

I wonder when "O" will have his next one...???

What's mgmt been saying at RGS lately?

Given all the "draft" and "xtra" lines, are they still trying to tell folks that we are 700 pilots overmanned?

I'd be very interested in seeing "O" come out and talk frankly to the pilots right now during peak.

Last edited by DLax85; 11-19-2009 at 09:01 PM. Reason: added verbiage
DLax85 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 09:32 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 397
Default

O was at RGS the other week and said we're 150 overmanned with the lines reduced to what they are now.
He said if we're out of 4a2b - we're 450-500 overmanned...
FDX28 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 04:53 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Posts: 328
Default

You don't want to hear O talk because he's just a tool; he doesn't make policy. You want to hear a bean counter explain the details.
FDXFLYR is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 05:32 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Question

Originally Posted by FDX28 View Post
O was at RGS the other week and said we're 150 overmanned with the lines reduced to what they are now.
He said if we're out of 4a2b - we're 450-500 overmanned...
Thanks for the update.

How was the overall interaction?

Did he take any questions or make statements regarding:

- Decreased number of scheduled reserves

- Increased use of reserves

- Increased use of draft

- Increased addition of Xtra pairings after bid pack release

- Increase in domestic or international volumes

- Increase in number of retirements

- His best guess on 4A2B exit

- His take on the current value of "goodwill" of the pilot force, especially with peak approaching

These are all questions I think we should ask at every opportunity.

I can't imagine that the true answers to these questions are static.

Thanks again.

Last edited by DLax85; 11-20-2009 at 05:34 AM. Reason: added verbiage
DLax85 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 05:33 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FDX28 View Post
O was at RGS the other week and said we're 150 overmanned with the lines reduced to what they are now.
He said if we're out of 4a2b - we're 450-500 overmanned...
Thanks for the update.

Somehow, pushing line averages 10-15% below contractual min results in 350 (350/4500= 7.8%) less overmanning.

My math is not creative enough to make sense of this position.
Gunter is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 05:48 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Why did management think transitioning from 3 man DC-10s to 2 man MD-10s and 11s wouldn't create extra crewmembers? Same for 727 to 757. The 777 is also increasing efficiency but to a lesser degree.

We are funding the purchase of 757s and 777s. Every one should have the words "Brought to you by" and a big, fat ALPA sticker next to it. Maybe BC and DW can sign them.

We certainly aren't getting anything for the savings in crew costs operating our newest airplanes. Might as well see something on the side recognizing our big contribution.

I personally approve a BZ for the entire pilot group! Give them a pat on the back the next time you see them.

Last edited by Gunter; 11-20-2009 at 06:11 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 06:25 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

This way of funding new planes is so popular there's talk of replacing more than a few A300s with 757s and, eventually, replacing MD-11s (all?) with 777s.

This is, of course, over and above the replacement of A310s currently underway.
Gunter is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 07:43 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
subicpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: A300CAP
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by FDXFLYR View Post
You don't want to hear O talk because he's just a tool; he doesn't make policy. You want to hear a bean counter explain the details.
Did you just call the Chief Pilot a "tool"?...
subicpilot is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:13 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Default

Our CBA problems could have been averted by LANGUAGE INTENT STUDY ................... but the team did not do it, we did not demand it.
Is it true that no other ALPA Air Carriers have a 4a2b paragraph, only us ???
As far as the "process", I have lost almost every sliver of faith in the "process" and I liken it to the Justice System ; not sure any of it really works.
tennesseeflyboy is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 09:24 AM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
Default

"Did you just call the Chief Pilot a "tool"?."

Someone else asked him if he thought 4a2b was being implemented fairly amongst the crew force. He said "YES" guess he does see any of the 75 or asia bid pack or cant do simple math.

I'll say it again WE LOST 4a2b
skeebo2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lindy
Cargo
35
02-07-2010 12:27 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
23
11-12-2009 06:10 PM
NightBusDriver
Cargo
37
11-03-2009 06:12 AM
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
0
09-26-2009 05:57 AM
Rambler
Cargo
8
03-12-2009 06:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices