Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Mil Leave

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2009, 05:51 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 77
Default

ENFORCEMENT
The U.S. Department of Labor, Veterans Employment and Training
Service (VETS) is authorized to investigate and resolve complaints
of USERRA violations.

For assistance in filing a complaint, or for any other information on
USERRA, contact VETS at 1-866-4-USA-DOL or visit its website at
U.S. Department of Labor -- Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS). An interactive online USERRA Advisor can
be viewed at elaws - USERRA Advisor.

If you file a complaint with VETS and VETS is unable to resolve it,
you may request that your case be referred to the Department
of Justice or the Office of Special Counsel, as applicable, for
representation.
Osmosis is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 06:30 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Turpen View Post
Act! Don't whine.

I see no posts where action has been taken.

Having said that I do feel it is the Reservist's responsibility to give the company as much notice as possible. It is the responsible thing to do. Calling the Duty Officer at 6pm on Friday night to get off of a trip for Saturday drill weekend while within your legal rights is irresponsible. (Yes it happened and I was the DO and I took him off his trip)

Have you considered the possibility that folks are waiting longer to notify the company of mil leave to avoid harassment? Shorter notice results in fewer phone calls to the crewmember and employer.

That's definitely a form of action.
Gunter is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 11:40 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by MX727 View Post
You totally missed the problem with 4.a.2.b and you obviously have not paid any attention to what I have written in the past about 4.a.2.b. I wrote a fairly detailed post about how 4.a.2.b was originally obtained and why it was a noble thought. In fact, early in the year, someone on hear accused me of being management. LOL.

So, just to be clear, I'm very happy we didn't put anyone on the street, but I'm ****ed that they are offering so much draft to some, while others are left struggling at sub-60 hour months since last February.

The company has not applied 4.a.2.b. fairly across the board. From all evidence, they should have exited 4.a.2.b prior to peak and now they are relying on draft to man the trips. Had we exited 4.a.2.b, the lines would've been built to a level that would've allowed them to man the trips AND have sufficient RSV to cover the holidays.

Furthermore, this thread is about FedEx's illegal treatment of military members when they exercise their USERRA rights.

So, I stand by my opinion that I think our management is making some serious miscalculations, which are going to cause service failures and cost the company in the very near term.
We may have shot our own foot AGAIN!!! The most compelling evidence to get us out of 4a2b is happening as we speak -- and is not a part of the arbitration evidence. Had we kept our powder dry and waited a few more months to arbitrate, we may have stood a better chance of recovering some cash.

PIPE
pipe is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 12:07 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

I don't think anyone thought they would try to run peak under 4.a.2.b, so I bet we were trying to get the grievance heard before they exited on their own.
MX727 is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 01:23 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drftddgr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Airbus F/O
Posts: 148
Default hey MX

hows everything? still no draft for me even tho 3 calls yesterday and 13 since 4a2b. coulda paid for the wifey's new/used beemer.

is the track dry?

sorry didn't mean to hijack

Last edited by drftddgr; 11-25-2009 at 01:34 PM.
drftddgr is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 01:48 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bleedairpacks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: MD11 CA (rtd.)
Posts: 318
Default

I'm not touching this thread either; too many looneys and FX Security troll this site.

Happy Turkey guys.
bleedairpacks is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 02:04 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Turpen View Post
If all this is true then turn the evidence over to ALPA and the Military lawyers and let the process run the course.

If you read the MLA info ALPA put out it should be clear that it is within your rights not to justify your MLA at all, period, end of discussion.

So if your caller ID doesn't work and you wind up talking to someone who is violating your rights you should already have the appropriate legal offical's phone number to pass them off to.

Act! Don't whine. I would be very surprised if the Military would allow these alleged actions to continue. In a prior post someone said the purpose of these kind of posts was to keep everyone informed. I see no posts where action has been taken.

Having said that I do feel it is the Reservist's responsibility to give the company as much notice as possible. It is the responsible thing to do. Calling the Duty Officer at 6pm on Friday night to get off of a trip for Saturday drill weekend while within your legal rights is irresponsible. (Yes it happened and I was the DO and I took him off his trip)


If you wind up having to serve your country on a holiday, my sincere thanks to you, and I mean it. I know what it is like.
That's great Chuck.

The need to call the DO is a harassment measure and nothing more. It's purpose is to intimidate and/or make difficult the short-notice input of an MLA NOTIFICATION.

The DO has no say in the matter and the schedulers deal with any fallout. So what is the call to the DO for? SEE ABOVE.

PIPE
pipe is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 02:04 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by bleedairpacks View Post
I'm not touching this thread either; too many looneys and FX Security troll this site.

Happy Turkey guys.

Do tell? Why should we be concerned about FedEx Security reviewing a military leave thread? According to a recent ALPA email, the company is sometimes in violation of federal law?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 02:05 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Turpen View Post
If all this is true then turn the evidence over to ALPA and the Military lawyers and let the process run the course.

If you read the MLA info ALPA put out it should be clear that it is within your rights not to justify your MLA at all, period, end of discussion.

So if your caller ID doesn't work and you wind up talking to someone who is violating your rights you should already have the appropriate legal offical's phone number to pass them off to.

Act! Don't whine. I would be very surprised if the Military would allow these alleged actions to continue. In a prior post someone said the purpose of these kind of posts was to keep everyone informed. I see no posts where action has been taken.

Having said that I do feel it is the Reservist's responsibility to give the company as much notice as possible. It is the responsible thing to do. Calling the Duty Officer at 6pm on Friday night to get off of a trip for Saturday drill weekend while within your legal rights is irresponsible. (Yes it happened and I was the DO and I took him off his trip)


If you wind up having to serve your country on a holiday, my sincere thanks to you, and I mean it. I know what it is like.

The need to call the DO is a harassment measure and nothing more. It's purpose is to intimidate and/or make difficult the short-notice input of an MLA NOTIFICATION.

The DO has no say in the matter and the schedulers deal with any fallout. So what is the call to the DO for? SEE ABOVE.

PIPE
pipe is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 02:52 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: 777 Capt
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by pipe View Post
That's great Chuck.

The need to call the DO is a harassment measure and nothing more. It's purpose is to intimidate and/or make difficult the short-notice input of an MLA NOTIFICATION.

The DO has no say in the matter and the schedulers deal with any fallout. So what is the call to the DO for? SEE ABOVE.

PIPE
The call to the DO was the first and only notification given. I agree that the DO does not approve or disapprove the MLA but in the absence of an ACP he is the proper notification channel to start the process of trip removal.
Chuck Turpen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A320fumes
Major
4
10-02-2009 07:44 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
Horrible
Cargo
47
03-07-2009 12:23 AM
1stCivDiv
Cargo
6
03-04-2009 11:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices