Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE >

FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2010, 01:03 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

I think by low, he meant that 2300 with 800 in the aircraft would probably mean that he was hired at Fedex with 1500hrs, which is well below the average hrs to be hired here with.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:07 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
I think by low, he meant that 2300 with 800 in the aircraft would probably mean that he was hired at Fedex with 1500hrs, which is well below the average hrs to be hired here with.
What's the average total time of a typical single seat/IP pilot that only did the minimum commitment when there were hired at FedEx?
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:14 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

No idea, but you need 1500 hrs for an ATP, and it is required. I was just saying that the average flt time of a fedex pilot is probably around 4000.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:24 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
No idea, but you need 1500 hrs for an ATP, and it is required. I was just saying that the average flt time of a fedex pilot is probably around 4000.
I was just saying that I think you'd be hard pressed to find a single seat/tactical pilot that just did the minimum military commitment, had the sponsor, the 3 recs from FedEx pilots that he/she has flown operationally with, did the meet n' greet, passed the interview, and had much more than the 1500 hours to fill out the app.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:43 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Interesting thing to note is that could have represented 1300 hours of fighter time, which could equate to 7 years of flying, prior to getting hired into the right seat of the Mad Dog. Not saying that's the way it is, just that although 2300 hours does sound like low time, it could easily be real quality time over a good number of years.

JJ
Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
I think by low, he meant that 2300 with 800 in the aircraft would probably mean that he was hired at Fedex with 1500hrs, which is well below the average hrs to be hired here with.
My comment was innocent and I was trying to infer anything negative about certain classes of pilots or bring hate. TheWalrus said it best as to what I had been thinking.

I was interested in this accident because the USAF has had several KC-10s lose parts of the stab/elevator while encountering buffet. In one instance, I believe it was enough to cause damage to the stab trim jack screws/motors and the crew ended up with a jammed horizontal stabilizer.

I once had a TCAS RA which commanded a 3,750FPM descent. During the maneuver, it reversed itself and switched to a climbing TCAS RA. We were at FL280, 0.83M, and 565Klbs when it all started. Per the flight manual, I used the vertical speed wheel and autopilot to fly the RA (Air Force rules, not the TCAS maker's) and set the VVI in the green arc. When I rolled the vertical speed wheel from a descent to a climb, the aircraft shook violently ... very violently. Even though we were still at .83M, somehow the aircraft accelerated stalled?? I had our first set of receivers do a damage check of the tail and they didn't see anything unusual. We flew the mission and landed uneventually. I notified maintenance and they inspected the tail but found no damage.

A few months later, a safety rep from the Air Force and Boeing got in touch with me. It seems they were interested in my story and were investigating how the TCAS system could command rates of climbs, descent, and rollouts which could be outside the performance envelope of the KC-10. I've never heard back from them and I don't know what was or was not discovered.

One thing I know for sure, I'm not the only one who has had a KC-10 get into buffet like this.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:17 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Interesting thing to note is that could have represented 1300 hours of fighter time, which could equate to 7 years of flying, prior to getting hired into the right seat of the Mad Dog. Not saying that's the way it is, just that although 2300 hours does sound like low time, it could easily be real quality time over a good number of years.

JJ
7 years of flying to attain 1300, but it's good quality ?

1300 hours is 1300 hours. 15 hours a month.

I'm not unappreciative of our courageous men and women of the armed forces, but call it what it is, and furthermore who cares how many hours the pilot in question has. None of us are immune to accidents, incidents, violations, and just plain boneheaded mistakes....experience just means you've probably already made the same mistake and learned from it without incident.

FF

Last edited by FliFast; 03-30-2010 at 09:23 PM.
FliFast is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 03:15 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

I "think" we've had more than one MD-11 GPWS alert (usually in heavy rain showers which used to indicate as terrain prior to a software fix), that, during the flight manual recovery procedure (even by rather petite women) damaged the horizontal stab? It a long moment arm and it wouldn't take much to "over G" the tail?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 04:34 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast View Post
7 years of flying to attain 1300, but it's good quality ?

1300 hours is 1300 hours. 15 hours a month.

I'm not unappreciative of our courageous men and women of the armed forces, but call it what it is, and furthermore who cares how many hours the pilot in question. None of us are immune to accidents, incidents, violations, and just plain boneheaded mistakes....experience just means you've probably already made the same mistake and learned from it without incident.

FF

FF
Yes, of course you're right. 1300 hours is indeed 1300 hours. And there certainly can't be much difference between C-172 time and F-18 (flying off of an aircraft carrier.) I'm sure any interview board would rate both guys about the same. Another interesting point is that if this guy got hired at FedEx with minimum time, he is either a good stick (or for you heavy boys, a good yoke) or he's got some serious friends on the hiring board. I prefer to think that he's a good pilot. I do agree that in this business, there are those who have and those who will. That's why they publish accident and incident reports, so that we can learn and hopefully not repeat anothers mistake.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:21 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

There are those who have, and those who has been.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:22 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Yes, of course you're right. 1300 hours is indeed 1300 hours. And there certainly can't be much difference between C-172 time and F-18 (flying off of an aircraft carrier.) I'm sure any interview board would rate both guys about the same. Another interesting point is that if this guy got hired at FedEx with minimum time, he is either a good stick (or for you heavy boys, a good yoke) or he's got some serious friends on the hiring board. I prefer to think that he's a good pilot. I do agree that in this business, there are those who have and those who will. That's why they publish accident and incident reports, so that we can learn and hopefully not repeat anothers mistake.

JJ
I agree, that's why some of us were curious about this accident. But some of ya'll slammed the door in our faces with the "we've addressed it, you don't fly the MD-10, nothing to see here" attitude.

We weren't throwing stones in the glass house, we were trying to learn something to include in our bag of tricks.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
Lindy
Cargo
35
02-07-2010 12:27 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
4
02-06-2009 09:43 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
8
10-30-2008 12:04 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices