Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough >

Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2010, 06:40 PM
  #1  
Freightmama!
Thread Starter
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default Excuse me while I vomit - UPS Furlough

UPS to Begin Furloughing Pilots Sunday (Business First, May 19)

UPS Airlines, a division of United Parcel Service Inc., will furlough 54 pilots Sunday, the first of 300 pilots slated to be grounded in an attempt by the shipper to cut costs and streamline its operations.

Earlier this year, Atlanta-based UPS (NYSE: UPS) announced it would furlough the pilots after it failed to reach an agreement with the Independent Pilots Association on cost-cutting measures that would have preserved at least some of the jobs.

About 170 more pilots are expected to be let go by the end of the year. The remaining 76 will be let go sometime in 2011, said Patti Hobbs, strategic communications manager for Louisville-based UPS Airlines.

“This is a very tough and painful business decision,” Hobbs said.

UPS says move prompted by recession, fewer aircraft

She added that the airline was forced to reduce its staff because it has retired some of its older aircraft. UPS now flies 214 company-owned aircraft, compared with 262 at its peak in 2003, Hobbs said.

By getting rid of its fleet of Boeing 727, DC-8 and some older 747 aircraft, UPS eliminated the need for 400 pilots.

About 100 of the crew members were retrained to work on other aircraft, but at the average cost of $185,000 per year in pay in benefits, the company decided it couldn’t afford to keep all of them on the payroll, Hobbs said.




It's a business decision....I get it. Tough and painful for them? Uh, don't think so. If it was, they would go out of their way to make the MOU work and they wouldn't leave a bunch of pilots hanging (ie. not giving furlough dates).

Keeping someone on the payroll when you don't need them vs. can't afford them are two different things. GMAFB! I just want to slap some of these people sometimes.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:01 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustUnderPar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: UPS Captain
Posts: 837
Default

Yes FP I agree with you I want to vomit....oh wait....... I just did.

Whew...missed my key board
JustUnderPar is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:29 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
b2pilot186's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 266
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy View Post
...but at the average cost of $185,000 per year in pay in benefits, the company decided it couldn’t afford to keep all of them on the payroll, Hobbs said.[/B]
It just kills me when the company trots this figure out, trying to make the bottom 300 look like they're being paid this huge amount of money. The reality is that most of them have been on half-base-pay (around $65,000) for a year now because of RDG, job shares or leaves of absence. To top it all off, UPS is shafting them again by not paying for a move back stateside from Alaska. Not anywhere near the big-time, rich pilots that UPS tries to make the out to be...UPS pilots may not get a lot of sympathy from the general public, but UPS itself will get even less sympathy as it rakes in hundreds of millions in profit while dumping pilots, mechanics and their families overboard in this economy...all to make that bottom line look a little better. Nice.

B2P
b2pilot186 is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:58 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
furloughman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Default

Some of us will fortunately be going back to Delta as they recall this month... and we'll all pretend this UPS nightmare never occurred!
furloughman is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:22 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

furloughman,

In a few months, when you're operating a redeye for Delta, and the captain goes off about how awful it is there, you'll have some really great stories to tell him. See, it was all worth it.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:23 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by furloughman View Post
Some of us will fortunately be going back to Delta as they recall this month... and we'll all pretend this UPS nightmare never occurred!
Good for you!! I am really glad things will work out for some.
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:29 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 937
Default

Anyone the number to that truck driving school! I am going back to school to become a doctor! Wish I had made better choices about 15 years ago! Who knew the airline industry would be one step above working at burger king?
Shaggy1970 is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:06 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustUnderPar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: UPS Captain
Posts: 837
Default UPS makes History!!

First time a profitable airline has furloughed pilots.

See. They can lead the industry in something. Who said these guys were a bunch of backwards country bumpkins......
JustUnderPar is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:19 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

JUP,

Now they're MORE profitable. Remember you have to maximize shareholder value!
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:13 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy View Post
It's a business decision....I get it. Tough and painful for them? Uh, don't think so. If it was, they would go out of their way to make the MOU work and they wouldn't leave a bunch of pilots hanging (ie. not giving furlough dates).

Keeping someone on the payroll when you don't need them vs. can't afford them are two different things. GMAFB! I just want to slap some of these people sometimes.

Two of the reasons that the MOU failed and was not agressively renewed were:

1. Senior pilots complained that the MOU took good trips and filtered them to the VTO / RDG lines..thus creating an abrogation of seniority. In simple terms, senior pilots wanted first choice at the best trips and didn't feel trips left over for the RDG and from VTO should go to the VTO/RDG lines, which were predominantly held by junior pilots.

And "No", I'm not smart enough to invent this. This was told to me by our EB, ask them if you need to validate this.

2. Paper savings vs. Actual savings
In ANC there was 99% participation for the MOU. Unfortunately with 99% of the ANC F/Os (bottom 300 essentially minus the DC8 F/Es) the company was unable to fly its' schedule. Thus they were JA-ing and asking pilots that were signed up for the RDG to bid full lines.

Paper savings-yes. Actual saving-not as much as planned.

So, as we furlough our first 54 brothers and sisters this Sunday, it is difficult by nature, but obscene given the fact the company is significantly profitable and other solutions were possible but discarded.

FF
FliFast is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JustUnderPar
Cargo
796
08-13-2010 05:43 PM
ThreeSides
Cargo
22
03-17-2010 09:26 PM
weatherman
Cargo
9
02-15-2010 02:36 PM
MD11Simnerd
Cargo
84
06-12-2009 01:19 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices