Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
You are not a real pilot >

You are not a real pilot

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

You are not a real pilot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:29 AM
  #21  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
You're missing the whole point of this thread. Our government is acknowledging that "freight boys" are better pilots than the likes of UAL and DAL pilots, by mandating that freight pilots do not need as much rest to do the same job as pax carriers.

And, just so you're not confused...when I say "mandating", I'm not referring to what you do with your male flight attendants. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course.
If only everyone would read this post before spouting off on the merits of freight versus pax this thread would make so much more sense.

And we like to think of ourselves as intelligent.

Well played on the mandate too.
FXDX is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:45 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default

Based on the direction this thread took and the lack of comprehension by some, we are screwed.

Skeebo made an excellent post highlighting what the Washington elite think of cargo pilots. Busboy explained it to those who didn't get it. A few folks would be well served to edit or delete their posts.
MX727 is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:51 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lifizgud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Re-reading George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' and getting scared...
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by 7four7 View Post
You're. As in "you are"..

"your not a real pilot" makes no sense.
My "not a real pilot" what?
Lifizgud is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:52 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
onetime's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777 F/O
Posts: 340
Default Same airspace

When that well rested 76 passenger carrier crew is on takeoff roll, I sure hope that ultra tired, up all night on min rest, cargo crew does not miss the hold short radio call, while crossing mid-field. This is the picture that needs to be painted to Congress. We all share the same air transportation system, what or who is behind the cockpit door is irrelevant.
onetime is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:53 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lifizgud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Re-reading George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' and getting scared...
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by 7four7 View Post
You freight boys are gloating now....pre 9/11 each and everyone of you would have given up your first born to fly for the likes of DAL and UAL.

We all know the truth.

flame away
Yeah, but we wouldn't have LIKED it...!
Lifizgud is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:58 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Capt MD11
Posts: 29
Default

Thanks for posting this. We all need to work together for one level of safety
Turtledriver is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:00 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lifizgud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Re-reading George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' and getting scared...
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by onetime View Post
When that well rested 76 passenger carrier crew is on takeoff roll, I sure hope that ultra tired, up all night on min rest, cargo crew does not miss the hold short radio call, while crossing mid-field. This is the picture that needs to be painted to Congress. We all share the same air transportation system, what or who is behind the cockpit door is irrelevant.
I just hope the cargo crew is not just fully rested because they were now required to be in domicile 24 hours prior to starting a trip...the road to hell is paved with unintended consequences and we've seen the track record our gov't has with ready, fire, aim legislation...just sayin' the obvious...
Lifizgud is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:05 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by onetime View Post
When that well rested 76 passenger carrier crew is on takeoff roll, I sure hope that ultra tired, up all night on min rest, cargo crew does not miss the hold short radio call, while crossing mid-field. This is the picture that needs to be painted to Congress. We all share the same air transportation system, what or who is behind the cockpit door is irrelevant.
And when that not-well rested 767 passenger airline crew is landing on the taxiway at dawn, I sure hope no aircraft, cargo or pax, is using the same taxiway.
rv8builder is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 08:06 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by MX727 View Post
Based on the direction this thread took and the lack of comprehension by some, we are screwed.

Skeebo made an excellent post highlighting what the Washington elite think of cargo pilots. Busboy explained it to those who didn't get it. A few folks would be well served to edit or delete their posts.
And a few of us would do well to get a sense of humor. It improves lifespan.

As for the issue at hand, we have to start with a good dose of reality. People who are paid to do a job, and who are trained in "the system", are expected to take risks that the general public is not. This is why ferry permits exclude the carriage of passengers. It is why factories have yellow lines that visitors can not cross. It is why your local garage does not let customers into the bays.

So the thought that cargo pilots, or for that matter any flight crew on an airplane that is not carrying the general public, is entitled to the same protections as Joe Schmuck who just bought a ticket off of the Internet is deeply flawed and is not going to work.

However a strong argument can be made with regard to system integrity and that fatigue creates risks outside of the specific airplane. That approach has some legs.

But beware -- we may not like the results. We pilots are pretty good at numbers but really, really bad at understanding how other people are going to approach issues. And in this case the result for us could easily be less pay and more time away from home. Maybe that is right; maybe we do need to make drastic changes in the system. But anyone out there beating this drum thinking that their life is going to be better for it -- time to back off a few steps and think it through from different angles.
742Dash is offline  
Old 11-16-2011, 11:22 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
slavenaway's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash View Post
And to simulate having FAs I will take a few minutes and stand under the APU.
THAT is very funny.
slavenaway is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
jbt1407
Aviation Law
10
09-15-2012 10:42 AM
iflyatnite
Cargo
75
05-03-2010 07:13 AM
HSLD
Military
0
04-30-2009 05:27 PM
aerospacepilot
Regional
59
07-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices